100% de satisfacción garantizada Inmediatamente disponible después del pago Tanto en línea como en PDF No estas atado a nada 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resumen

Summary Psychology 243 Exam Notes

Puntuación
-
Vendido
2
Páginas
54
Subido en
29-08-2022
Escrito en
2022/2023

Covers Chapters 1,2,5,6,10,11,13,16, everything need for the exam

Institución
Grado











Ups! No podemos cargar tu documento ahora. Inténtalo de nuevo o contacta con soporte.

Escuela, estudio y materia

Institución
Grado

Información del documento

Subido en
29 de agosto de 2022
Número de páginas
54
Escrito en
2022/2023
Tipo
Resumen

Temas

Vista previa del contenido

MADE BY DARYAN.VDW


Psychology 243

Chapter 1: different methods of acquiring knowledge
WEEK ONE
Introduction:
• Research – to look again
• Social - people/ human beings and the world they inhabit
• Sciences – process of systematic inquiry (gaining knowledge)
§ Makes sense (logical)
§ Has a reference (observed evidence) and gives an explanation (theory)
• How does society progress?
§ By constantly generating new knowledge
§ Formulating specific questions and finding answers to them
§ Understanding ourselves and our environment
• Epistemology à the study of ways of knowing about the world (“what is
knowledge?”)
§ Non-scientific and scientific methods

Non-scientific methods: (Mainly based on faith/worldview)

Method of authority
• Relying on the knowledge and “wisdom” of prominent people (religious leaders,
politicians, elderly people, technocrats etc.)
• The statements of these people are rarely questioned or challenged
• Once individuals are placed in such positions, they rely on certain strategies to
justify and keep their position of authority (via impressive rituals, a way of
expression, or by emphasizing their position)
• Critique: allows individuals to hide the superficiality of their knowledge, its
underlying ideologies, and weaknesses in judgment

Mystical method
• Based on text or supernatural source
• The “knowledge producers” are seen as authorities because of their ability to
transmit the knowledge given to them by supernatural forces.
• Their credibility is related to the level of education and the general knowledge of
the audience and often lose influence when better/alternative explanations are
found

Intuitive method
• Ordinary reasoning through instinct/intuition
• People make judgement based on what “feels” right for them, for these feelings
help guide them in their lives
• Critique: depends on the individual and their personal understanding of the
issue, furthermore this method cannot be easily communicated to others, thus
the decisions and conclusions are not easily replicable


1

,MADE BY DARYAN.VDW


Conventional wisdom
• Accepted knowledge of the world
• “Common sense” understandings of the world
• However, these “common wisdom” statements are often contradictory
§ “Out of sight, out of mind” vs “absence makes the heart grow fonder”
§ No systematic way of determining which of these statements is accurate

However, the rationalistic and empirical method:
• Do not attribute special aptitudes to particular persons
• Differ only in importance given to reasoning and observation

The rationalistic method
• Based on human reason and logic - the basis of knowledge is correct reasoning
• Discovers laws through purely intellectual processes
• Enables us to know what is true by principle (pure mathematics used to develop
theories about the world)

The empirical method
• The opposite of the rationalistic method
• Facts objectively observed in nature are the foundation of knowledge
• Knowledge is based on only what is observable / perceived by our senses
• Used to test theories about the world

The Scientific method:

• Is a combination of the Rationalistic method & the Empirical method
• It uses rationalism to develop its theories
• Uses empiricism to test its theories
• Science – continuous interplay of rational thought and empirical observation
• The scientific method – the process of knowing

A Priori knowledge
• “from the earlier”
• A priori knowledge is knowledge that we can have "prior to experience".
• A priori knowledge or justification is independent of experience.

A Posteriori Knowledge
• “from the later”
• A posteriori knowledge is knowledge that we can have only after we have
certain experiences.
• A posteriori knowledge or justification is dependent on experience or
empirical evidence




2

, MADE BY DARYAN.VDW


The scientific method – the process of knowing
1. Step one
Daisy • A Description of the object, relationship, or situation (empirical) is
required.
2. Step Two
Eats • An Explanation or statement of the relationship between the described
facts should be expressed (rationalistic)
3. Step three
Pie • A Prediction of future events under well-defined conditions should be
permitted by the stated explanation.
4. Step four
• Intelligent Intervention, based on correct explanations leading to the
Impressively ability to predict events.


Qualitative research:
• Researcher concentrates on observation and recording of events
• No a priori explanations are given
• No expectations or predictions can be tested
• A posteriori explanations (at the end)

Science assumes the following:
1. The existence of natural and social laws
• These laws exist independently of the observer and they describe the
way phenomena interact or social events occur
2. Laws can be discovered by human beings
• Even though human beings are subjected to these laws
3. Natural phenomena have natural causes
• scientific understanding is based on parsimony of ideas: explanations
for phenomena are based on as few assumptions as possible, they are to
be as simple as possible
4. New knowledge is accumulated gradually and sequentially
• The invention of new instruments of investigation and new approaches
lead to new advances in science and often show the limitations of
previous knowledge
5. Knowledge and truth are founded on evidence
• If evidence is not provided the claim remains at the level of a hypothesis
6. Scientific statements must be distinguished from common-sense
statements
• Common sense statements are the result of non-scientific observations
7. Scientific observation is objective
• Meaning that the result of the observation is independent of a single
observer
8. Scientific observation is systematic
• Meaning that all possibilities are considered one at a time, in a logical
order


3

, MADE BY DARYAN.VDW


However it is important to note:
• Often some characteristics are unknown
• Can only predict an event when ALL conditions and circumstances are known
• In social sciences it is rare to possess all information

Probability statement:
• If some conditions are satisfied the event will occur more often than if some of
these conditions were not met


Probabilistic explanation:
• Explanations that concede some uncertainty

Characteristics of scientific research:
1. Empirical à each step is based on observation
2. Systematic and logical à observation must be done systematically, and a
logical order followed
3. Replicable and transmittable à anyone placed in exactly the same
circumstances can observe the same event and by reasoning, arrive at the
same explanation and prediction
4. Reductive à all details which are not essential are omitted
• Reductionism has to be used with care because it can lead to bias in the
research
5. Falsifiable à the scientific claim must be testable in such a way that it can be
demonstrated to be false
• It should not only tell us what should happen but also what should not
happen

The Relationship between theory and research:
• Deduction:
§ Going from the general to the specific
§ Using general principles to suggest specific outcomes
• Induction:
§ Going from the specific to the general
§ Using a number of specific observations to formulate general principles




4
$8.57
Accede al documento completo:

100% de satisfacción garantizada
Inmediatamente disponible después del pago
Tanto en línea como en PDF
No estas atado a nada

Conoce al vendedor

Seller avatar
Los indicadores de reputación están sujetos a la cantidad de artículos vendidos por una tarifa y las reseñas que ha recibido por esos documentos. Hay tres niveles: Bronce, Plata y Oro. Cuanto mayor reputación, más podrás confiar en la calidad del trabajo del vendedor.
Daryanvdw Stellenbosch University
Seguir Necesitas iniciar sesión para seguir a otros usuarios o asignaturas
Vendido
148
Miembro desde
6 año
Número de seguidores
114
Documentos
53
Última venta
1 mes hace

4.4

23 reseñas

5
13
4
7
3
3
2
0
1
0

Recientemente visto por ti

Por qué los estudiantes eligen Stuvia

Creado por compañeros estudiantes, verificado por reseñas

Calidad en la que puedes confiar: escrito por estudiantes que aprobaron y evaluado por otros que han usado estos resúmenes.

¿No estás satisfecho? Elige otro documento

¡No te preocupes! Puedes elegir directamente otro documento que se ajuste mejor a lo que buscas.

Paga como quieras, empieza a estudiar al instante

Sin suscripción, sin compromisos. Paga como estés acostumbrado con tarjeta de crédito y descarga tu documento PDF inmediatamente.

Student with book image

“Comprado, descargado y aprobado. Así de fácil puede ser.”

Alisha Student

Preguntas frecuentes