Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

Portfolio Gevorderd

Rating
-
Sold
1
Pages
96
Uploaded on
23-08-2022
Written in
2021/2022

Volledig portfolio met algemeen feedback. Met als eindcijfer een 8,3.

Institution
Course

Content preview

Sas (student)
Stagebegeleiders:
Stagedocent:
LWG-docent:
Slb’er:

PORTFOLIO PLP
School: Windesheim
Klas: VPV

Plaats praktijkleren:


GEVORDERD
Tijdsperiode: 7 februari – 1 juli 2022
Adres:


6 juni 2022

,Inhoud
Checklist portfolio...................................................................................................................................2
Cles- T.....................................................................................................................................................3
1. Selfassessment...................................................................................................................................0
1.1. CanMEDS-rol Zorgverlener.........................................................................................................0
1.2. CanMEDS-rol Samenwerkingspartner..........................................................................................7
1.3. CanMEDS-rol Organisator..........................................................................................................12
1.4. CanMEDS-rol Professional en kwaliteitsbevorderaar................................................................15
2. Beroepstaak 1: Zorg en preventie uitvoeren en organiseren...........................................................22
2.2. Feedbackformulier 1:.................................................................................................................29
2.3. Feedbackformulier 2:.................................................................................................................31
2.4. Feedbackformulier 3:.................................................................................................................32
2.5. STARRT 1....................................................................................................................................34
3. Beroepstaak 2: Gezondheidsbevordering.........................................................................................38
3.2. Feedbackformulier 1:.................................................................................................................44
3.3. Feedbackformulier 2:.................................................................................................................45
3.4. Feedbackformulier 3:.................................................................................................................47
3.5. STARRT 2:...................................................................................................................................48
3.5.1. ASE model:..........................................................................................................................52
4. Beroepstaak 3: Kwaliteit van zorg bevorderen.................................................................................56
4.2. Feedback formulier 1:................................................................................................................61
4.3. Feedbackformulier 2:.................................................................................................................63
4.4. Feedbackformulier 3:.................................................................................................................65
4.5. STARRT 3:...................................................................................................................................66
5. Bewijsstukken:..................................................................................................................................69
5.2. Ontslag regelen mevr. W:..........................................................................................................69
5.3. Situatie mevr. P:.........................................................................................................................70
5.4. MDO:.........................................................................................................................................71
5.5. 5a model:...................................................................................................................................71
5.6. Model van korthagen 1:.............................................................................................................73
5.7. Model van Korthagen 2:............................................................................................................74
5.8. Aanvullend feedback.................................................................................................................75
5.9. Cursus sondevoedingpomp.......................................................................................................76

1

, 5.10. MIC-melding............................................................................................................................76
5.11. Wet zorg en Dwang.................................................................................................................77
6. Formatieve beoordeling beginsituatie:.............................................................................................77
7. Formatieve beoordeling Verbeteradvies:.........................................................................................79
8. Tussengesprek:.................................................................................................................................82
8.2. Verslag:......................................................................................................................................82
8.3. Beoordelingsformulier:..............................................................................................................82
9. Voortgangsgesprek:..........................................................................................................................83
9.1. Verslag:......................................................................................................................................83
9.2. Beoordelingsformulier:..............................................................................................................83
10. SB opdracht profielkeuze................................................................................................................85
11. Verwijzingen...................................................................................................................................86




Checklist portfolio
Het portfolio dient conform de weekplanning PLP gevorderd (zie document ELO) ingeleverd te
worden en aangeleverd bij de werkbegeleider en eventueel andere aanwezigen bij het gesprek. Het
portfolio bevat minimaal de onderdelen vermeld op deze checklist (aankruisen ter bevestiging van de
aanwezigheid en opnemen in het portfolio).


2

, Algemeen (let op de bestandsnaam!)
⃝ Titelblad met de volgende punten: Titel Naam student, studentnummer, groepsnummer LWG
Naam begeleiders (werkbegeleider, stagedocent, LWG-docent en studiebegeleider) Plaats van
praktijkleren, tijdsperiode (begin- en einddatum van de stage), stageadres en datum
⃝ Een inhoudsopgave
⃝ Deze checklist voor controle op het portfolio
⃝ Cles-T bewijs van deelname aan de digitale stage-evaluatie (wordt toegestuurd vanuit school)
⃝ Een literatuurlijst
⃝ Het portfolio (als Word document) met daarin alle onderdelen uit deze checklist bestaat uit
maximaal 100 pagina’s met lettertype Calibri punt 11.

Verplichte bewijzen
⃝ Formatieve beoordeling portfolio beginsituatie met feedback
⃝ Formatieve beoordeling tussengesprek met feedback & gespreksverslag
⃝ Formatieve beoordeling voortgangsgesprek met feedback & gespreksverslag
⃝ Formatieve beoordeling beroepsproduct verbeteradvies met feedback
⃝ De ondertekende definitieve adviesbeoordeling (met stand van zaken ontwikkeling
kernbegrippen), feedbackformulieren en STARRT uitwerkingen ten aanzien van de beroepstaken 1.
uitvoering van zorg en preventie en organiseren 2. gezondheidsbevordering 3. kwaliteit van zorg
bevorderen
⃝ SB opdracht profielkeuze
⃝ Het ingevulde selfassessment

Bewijzen
⃝ Aanvullend bewijsmateriaal, ten aanzien van je ontwikkeling op CanMEDSrollen van zorgverlener,
samenwerkingspartner, organisator en professional & kwaliteitsbevorderaar.




Cles- T




3

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
August 23, 2022
Number of pages
96
Written in
2021/2022
Type
OTHER
Person
Unknown

Subjects

$8.78
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
saschachantal1

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
saschachantal1 Hogeschool Windesheim
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
7
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
6
Documents
3
Last sold
2 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions