100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

Tsar Alexander II Emancipation Edict Revision Notes

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
7
Geüpload op
30-06-2022
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Detailed revision notes which set out clearly the causes, results and consequences of Tsar Alexander II's Emancipation Edict.

Instelling
Vak









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Study Level
Publisher
Subject
Course

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
30 juni 2022
Aantal pagina's
7
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Overig
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Emancipation of the Serfs 1861
Russia in 1855

Strengths of 1855 Russia Weaknesses of 1855 Russia
 World largest army of approx. 1.5  AUTOCRACY
million  Edicts from the Tsar = law
 Russian empire = ethnically and  Tsar appointed his own advisers
religiously diverse  Secret police
 Tsar-Peasant link  Inequal society: lack of a middle
class, only top and bottom classes
 Russia = backwards compared to
rest of Europe
 Serfdom obstructed economic &
industrial progress
 Surfs lacked freedom of movement
and were tied to their land
 No internal market demands
 Calls for democratic reform initially
ignored by Tsar  Decembrist
Uprising 1825


Who were the Serf’s?
No basic human, political or civil rights
Organised into communities  Mir: allocated land to the Serfs, could physically punish
them & prevented them from moving away
Not technically slaves  not owned by their landlord but required to…
Give up freedom of movement = a system of slavery as Serfs couldn’t leave the land unless
permitted by landlord  tied to the land
2 main categories of Serfs:
1.Worked the land & gave produce to their landlords
2.Worked in the homes of landlords
Landlords…
 acted as recruiting officers: Serfs required to perform military service of 25 years
 sold their Serfs often breaking up families in the process (technically not allowed to
but did anyway)
 could arrange marriages between Serfs and looked to breed strong healthy Serfs to
improve their stocks
 acted as their Serfs Judge and Jury & could administer punishments to a Serf, send
them into the army or exile them to Siberia

, Terms of the Emancipation Edict:
1. All privately owned Serfs = freed
2. State owned Serfs = receive freedom in 1866
3. Freed Serfs could  own property, own business, sue in courts, vote in local
elections, marry who they want
4. Freed-Serfs received an allotment of land taken from their former landowner’s
estate  this land was decided by the landowners and allocated by official surveyors
5. Landowners compensated for lost Land by the state, land valued generously
6. Freed-Serfs paid for allotments through Redemption Payments
o Redemption payments: loan payments to the government paid for 49 years
with a 6% annual interest, Serfs only received full rights once this had been
fully paid off
7. Freed-Serfs given option of continuing work on former landowner’s land for so many
days a year to help pay back redemption payments
8. The Mirs were given responsibility for collecting redemption payments, the sale of
land and what was farmed
o Mirs: peasant villages/ communes
9. Landowners kept control of meadows, woodland, and pasture
10. There was a 2-year period of ‘temporary obligation’ before freedom was granted
where the allocation of land was sorted out

Benefited Serfs Benefited Landlords
 Freedom  Landowners chose the land to give
 Own property, business etc… to ex-serfs  save best for
 Right to vote in local elections themselves
 Worse off  Landowners = access to forests etc…
 access to wood, animals to hunt
which ex-serfs don’t have
 Received compensation from ex-
serfs through redemption payments
 If couldn’t pay redemption
payments serfs = not fully free and
still had to work on land to
compensate
 Better off than Serfs/ ex-Serfs




Impact of Edict:

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
daveyevie Loughborough University
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
13
Lid sinds
3 jaar
Aantal volgers
4
Documenten
11
Laatst verkocht
8 maanden geleden

5.0

1 beoordelingen

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen