100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Other

A* Pressure Groups and Rights Essay Plans

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
20
Uploaded on
31-05-2022
Written in
2021/2022

Democracy and Participation Essay Plans based on 2022 Advanced Information for Edexcel A-Level Politics. Plans for 1.3 Pressure Groups and 1.4 Rights in context. Achieved A* in Politics (2022).

Institution
Module










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
May 31, 2022
Number of pages
20
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Other
Person
Unknown

Subjects

Content preview

British Politics Exam Qs Planned

HOW TO: 30 MARK ESSAY




● 30 marks, 45 minutes
● The question stem will always be Evaluate the view…
● Both sides of the debate – give a fair balance however you must favour one side.

STRUCTURE
Introduction:
● Define key terms
● Give political context – why are they asking this question?
● Outline the main points you may cover
● Give a clear judgement
○ Don’t say “to an extent…” and sit on the fence.

Main body paragraphs:
● Point 1 – A significant point in favour of your argument, counterpoint and an interim
conclusion.
● Point 2 – A point in favour of your argument, counterpoint and an interim conclusion.
● Point 3 – Another point (maybe less significant) in favour of your argument, counterpoint and
an interim conclusion.
● Embedded judgements
○ The most important reason why…
○ A weaker argument that is often argued…
○ Giving priorities to some arguments over others.
● Analysis – significance, consequences, weaknesses, strengths, changes over time, or to
deconstruct your point, to show its impact and to link it to concepts and ideas.
○ Think about why examples are significant.

Conclusion:
● Restate your clear judgement – give your main reason behind judgement


HOW TO: 30 MARK SOURCE ESSAY

● 30 marks, 45 minutes
● The question stem will always be: Using the source, evaluate the view that…
● Both sides of the debate – give a fair balance however you must favour one side.

, ● Go into the exam with 3 highlighters: one for the point, one for the counterpoint and one for
any evidence used in the source.
● Quote the source so it’s clear that you’re using it – you can also paraphrase the source and
state “according to the source”

STRUCTURE
Introduction:
● Define key terms
● Set out the debate
● Express your argument
● Start with the strongest argument on the side of the argument you agree with from the source.

Main body paragraphs:
● Point 1 – A significant point in favour of your argument, counterpoint and an interim
conclusion.
● Point 2 – A point in favour of your argument, counterpoint and an interim conclusion.
● Point 3 – Another point (maybe less significant) in favour of your argument, counterpoint and
an interim conclusion.
● Embedded judgements
○ The most important reason why…
○ A weaker argument that is often argued…
○ Giving priorities to some arguments over others.
● Analysis – significance, consequences, weaknesses, strengths, changes over time, or to
deconstruct your point, to show its impact and to link it to concepts and ideas.
○ Think about why examples are significant.

Alternative structure for main body paragraphs (IDEALS paragraphs):
● IDENTIFY – what is the argument in the source, start with the strongest argument
● DESCRIBE – give more detail explaining what the argument is
● EXAMPLE – bring in an example from your own knowledge and back it up
● ANSWER – directly link to the question and how this argument answers the question, explain
why this argument is strong/the logic behind it.
● LINK – bring in the opposing argument from the source, explain how they link. Explain this
opposing view and how it goes against your argument.
● SCRUTINISE – criticise the counterargument using analysis and examples.

Conclusion:
● Restate your clear judgement – give your main reason behind judgement

HOW TO WRITE AN A* ESSAY:
1. A strong introduction – give political context, define any key terms, set out the main points
of the debate, give a clear judgement.
2. Your judgement is sustained – start with your judgement, echo your judgement throughout.
3. Use key terms
4. An intertwined debate – respond to your main point with the other side of the debate.
5. Deep analysis – significance of your point/examples?, strengths and weaknesses, links
6. A strong conclusion – restate your central argument, give main points behind your
judgement.

HOW TO GET TOP MARKS IN AO1:
● Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of political institutions, processes, concepts,
theories and issues.

, ● The key is having lots of good examples and explaining, not just using political terms and
concepts.
● Understanding is a key part of AO1 – define/explain political terms when you use them.
● The more specific and well-selected examples you have the higher your AO1 mark will be.

HOW TO GET TOP MARKS IN AO2:
● Analyse aspects of politics and political information, including in relation to parallels,
connections, similarities and differences.
● AO2 is about your ability to compare points to counter-points, one type of an ideology with
another…
● Analysis – scrutiny and probing
● Candidates should form analytical views which support and reject the view presented by the
question.
○ They should look at different perspectives that arise from the view presented by the
question and show how these lay the foundations for a judgement.

HOW TO GET TOP MARKS IN AO3:
● Evaluate aspects of politics and political information, including to construct arguments, make
substantiated judgements and draw conclusions.
● It’s essential you run an argument through your whole essay going from the introduction
through to your conclusion.
● Make sure there is some nuance to your argument/judgement.
● Introduction – define the key terms in the question, set out the argument (the points and
counterpoints you are going to look at)
● Mini conclusions – each paragraph should have a mini conclusion.

● Which side of the debate wins?
● Why does it win?
● Rank in importance the analytical points (AO2) for
● Rank in importance the analytical points (AO2) against
● Think holistically and reason through the conclusion.
● Form and come to a judgement, based on evidence not a mere opinion.
● Discuss possible alternative constructive comments on reform/change to the issue/debate.
What is the likelihood of such change, and would it be effective/successful?

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ayshamajeed University of Birmingham
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
33
Member since
3 year
Number of followers
28
Documents
4
Last sold
6 months ago

3.8

5 reviews

5
2
4
1
3
1
2
1
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions