100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Communicatieklassiekers Module 4-6

Rating
5.0
(1)
Sold
12
Pages
20
Uploaded on
09-05-2022
Written in
2021/2022

Samenvatting van lectures agendasetting (M4), cultivation theory (M5) en knowledge gap (M6). In het Engels met toelichtingen van docent (evt in Nederlands)

Institution
Module









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Module

Document information

Uploaded on
May 9, 2022
Number of pages
20
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Communicatie
Klassiekers 2022




Naam Kayi Man

Studentnr Studentnummer
Klas Klas

Module Module 4 - 6
Docent Docent
Datum 2022

, Communicatie Klassiekers 2022
Kayi Man




Inhoudsopgave
1 M4 Agenda setting............................................................................................................3
1.1 Agenda setting, definition ......................................................................................4
1.2 Study design (p179) ..............................................................................................4
1.3 Narrative Framing – Ethos, logos, pathos .............................................................5
1.4 Associative framing (2e level agenda setting) .......................................................5
1.5 Point of reference framing – Jamie Druckman 2001 (Equivalence framing) .........5
1.6 Follow-up research McCombs & Shaw agenda setting (1972) .............................6
1.7 Mediatization, mediacracy .....................................................................................6
1.8 Political agenda setting (202-206) .........................................................................7
1.9 Mediatization: Four phases Strömbäck (206) [MEDIA > POLITICY] .....................7
1.10 [POLITIC > MEDIA] 2 theories ..............................................................................8
1.11 Synthesis/summary ...............................................................................................8
1.12 Examples agendasetting: ......................................................................................9
1.13 What did we learn/conclusion?............................................................................10
2 M5 Cultivation Theory.....................................................................................................11
2.1 Cultivation: set-up (developed by Gerbner & Gross, 1976; Morgan et al., 2009)11
2.2 Cultivation: essentials part 1 (Gerbner & Gross, 1976) .......................................12
2.3 Cultivation: essentials part 2 (Gerbner & Gross, 1976) .......................................13
2.4 Cultivation: essentials part 3 – research survey (Gerbner & Gross, 1976) .........13
2.5 Mainstreaming – Morgan et al., 2009 p41 [S12] record: 1:12:30 ........................14
2.6 Cultivation today: research – Morgan et al., 2009; Shrum, 2004 ........................15
2.7 Example: Cultivation of dating shows – Ferris, Smith, Greenberg,& Smith, 2007
15
2.8 Psychology of “cultivation” – Shrum 1995, 1999 .................................................16
3 M6 Knowledge gap .........................................................................................................17
3.1 Knowledge gap: Basics idea – Tichenor, Donohue, & Olien, 1970 .....................17
3.2 Knowledge gaps: Five reasons why ....................................................................17
3.3 4 moderators – Tichenor et al., 1976 ..................................................................18
3.4 Moderators: Minnesota community studies – Tichenor et al., 1976 ....................18
3.5 Ceiling effect after continuing high media publicity .............................................18
3.6 Moderators – Hwang & Jeong, 2010: Meta-analyse ...........................................19
3.7 IT as a solution? (Van Dijk, 2006, review) ...........................................................19
3.8 A final moderator – New media access (Prior, 2005) ..........................................19
3.9 What you need to know .......................................................................................20




2

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all reviews
1 year ago

5.0

1 reviews

5
1
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
pikayichu Hogeschool van Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
34
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
23
Documents
11
Last sold
8 months ago

4.5

4 reviews

5
2
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions