Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Resume

Corporate Communication FULL SUMMARY

Note
-
Vendu
1
Pages
36
Publié le
08-03-2022
Écrit en
2021/2022

This document contains everything you need to know for the exam from Corporate Communication, including lectures, article summaries and book. I learned only from this summary and passed with 9.2.

Établissement
Cours











Oups ! Impossible de charger votre document. Réessayez ou contactez le support.

Livre connecté

École, étude et sujet

Établissement
Cours
Cours

Infos sur le Document

Livre entier ?
Oui
Publié le
8 mars 2022
Nombre de pages
36
Écrit en
2021/2022
Type
Resume

Sujets

Aperçu du contenu

Week 1

Lecture 1

Definition of Corporate Communication BOOK P. 5

A management function that offers a framework for the effective coordination of all internal and external
communication with the overall purpose of establishing and maintaining favourable reputations with
stakeholder groups upon which the organization is dependent. (Cornelissen, 2017)

Corporate Communication:

 Aim is to oversee & coordinate all communication of employees and departments of the organization
 Corporate Communication is integrated around one mission/vision/ corporate identity
 Corporate Communication is strategic

Corporate Reputation (also in week 2) BOOK P. 85

The collective evaluation of an organization (induced through either communication or past experiences) established
over time.

 Collective as the image perceived by the group matters -> how positive all the people think a company
is
 Can be a type of a 'buffer' form bad publicity


Corporate Communication




Organization - "a group of people working together to reach a common goal"

Organisations AS Communication

 Communicative Constitution of Organizations (CCO)
 Organizations CONSIST OF communication
 Please check YouTube movie under ‘required readings’ W1


Five approaches to communication management (Van Ruler, 2005):

, Informative approach
 Just information transition from sender to receiver
 One-way line of the communication
 Basic, receiver unpacks the information as intended by the sender
 Your aim is to reach people

 Persuasive approach
 Intended to have some effect on people
 We want to get certain approach to peoples minds
 Either in terms of behaviour or thinking
 You don’t want to just reach people, you want to get some results
 People who have a strong attitude -> experience less of a effect of communication
 E.g. using with marketing and pretesting

 Relational approach
 Communication contributes towards forming a relationship between actors
 Both parties should be willing to keep the others interest in mind
 Trust is created

 Interpretative approach
 Each actor is both sender and receiver
 Based on social constructivism
 Devotes attention to the meanings people construct through communication
 What people see and know about reality -> construction of a mind, derived from
communication (including reading, watching and listening, media, etc. )
 We all have different ideas about this organization -> through communication we construct
images of those constructs combined with others people images.
 E.g. although produced to serve with a particular meaning people can adapt a product to suits
their needs -> e.g. like the development of Netflix

 Critical approach
 Normative theory -> what should communication look like (others state what is looks like)

,  Takes into consideration power structures - communication can establish power (e.g. yellow
jackets riots in Paris)
 Contribute to the society that is open for new ideas


Historic Development of Corporate Communication:




What kind of society are you establishing through communication?
 Power inequalities
 Before 1970s - large emphasis on reaching the audience and getting the message to them and further
 After that marketing came up, increasing the desire to change peoples attitudes towards brands and
certain ideas
 After 2000s- companies want a relationship with stakeholders-> more efficient, less use of mass
media, engaging in a dialogue
 Large emphasis on engagement and building trust


The Environment of Organizations
Stakeholders & Issues
Assessing the relationships , how an organization relates with different parties in the environment.
Input - output model BOOK P. 63




 Organization is the centre of economy, each contributor of inputs is rewarded witch appropriate
compensation and as a result of competition throughout the system the bulk of benefits will go to
customers

,  Power lies with the organization on which the other parties are dependent and their relationship to the
organization is only financial

Stakeholder theory BOOK P. 63/4




Mutual dependencies between organizations and various stakeholders groups - groups that are affected by operations
of the organization, but can equally affect organization, its operation and performance

 Taking into consideration more parties in the environment of the company
 Two-way relationships -> recognizing that the need and dependence along with profits and benefits
happens both ways
 Instrumental (prescribes that when you deal with all those stakeholders in an effective manner you
will be more successful)


Stakeholder BOOK P. 64
Each group, or individual that can influence or is influenced by the behaviour of the organization. (Freeman, 1984)
 E.g. investors, customers, suppliers, employees - most important to have a good relationship with
 But there are so much more parties - stakeholder theory

Stake BOOK P. 64
An interest (belang in Dutch) or stake in a corporation, which can vary from personal interest to ownership of the
organization’ (Carroll, 1996).
 Categorize the stakeholders and asses their importance

Stakeholder salience model: BOOK P. 67, 68, 69
 How much power, legitimacy and urgency a
stakeholder has over the organization
 Based on that an organization assesses how important
a stakeholder is for the organization and how they
should communicate with them
 Most important a definitive stakeholder
 Needs constant reanalysis and recalculations
$9.11
Accéder à l'intégralité du document:

Garantie de satisfaction à 100%
Disponible immédiatement après paiement
En ligne et en PDF
Tu n'es attaché à rien

Faites connaissance avec le vendeur

Seller avatar
Les scores de réputation sont basés sur le nombre de documents qu'un vendeur a vendus contre paiement ainsi que sur les avis qu'il a reçu pour ces documents. Il y a trois niveaux: Bronze, Argent et Or. Plus la réputation est bonne, plus vous pouvez faire confiance sur la qualité du travail des vendeurs.
studentstudyhelp Universiteit van Amsterdam
S'abonner Vous devez être connecté afin de suivre les étudiants ou les cours
Vendu
31
Membre depuis
4 année
Nombre de followers
29
Documents
7
Dernière vente
1 année de cela

5.0

2 revues

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Récemment consulté par vous

Pourquoi les étudiants choisissent Stuvia

Créé par d'autres étudiants, vérifié par les avis

Une qualité sur laquelle compter : rédigé par des étudiants qui ont réussi et évalué par d'autres qui ont utilisé ce document.

Le document ne convient pas ? Choisis un autre document

Aucun souci ! Tu peux sélectionner directement un autre document qui correspond mieux à ce que tu cherches.

Paye comme tu veux, apprends aussitôt

Aucun abonnement, aucun engagement. Paye selon tes habitudes par carte de crédit et télécharge ton document PDF instantanément.

Student with book image

“Acheté, téléchargé et réussi. C'est aussi simple que ça.”

Alisha Student

Foire aux questions