100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Computational Analysis in Digital Communication

Rating
-
Sold
2
Pages
28
Uploaded on
24-11-2021
Written in
2021/2022

A summary of the five required readings for 'Computational Analysis in Digital Communication.' This course is taught in the master 'Communication Science' at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. The summary is in English.

Institution
Course










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
November 24, 2021
File latest updated on
November 29, 2021
Number of pages
28
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Summary Computational Analysis of Digital Communication
November/December 2021



Literature

1. Van Atteveldt, W., & Peng, T. Q. (2018). When communication meets computation:
Opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in computational communication
science. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(2-3), 81-92.

2. Heidenreich, T., Eberl, J. M., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. (2020). Political
migration discourses on social media: a comparative perspective on visibility
and sentiment across political Facebook accounts in Europe. Journal of Ethnic
and Migration Studies, 46(7), 1261-1280.

3. Mellado, C., Hallin, D., Cárcamo, L., Alfaro, R., Jackson, D., Humanes, M. L., ... &
Ramos, A. (2021). Sourcing pandemic news: A cross-national computational
analysis of mainstream media coverage of Covid-19 on Facebook, Twitter,
and Instagram. Digital Journalism, 1-25.

4. Van Atteveldt, W., van der Velden, M. A., & Boukes, M. (2021). The Validity of
Sentiment Analysis: Comparing Manual Annotation, Crowd-Coding,
Dictionary Approaches, and Machine Learning Algorithms. Communication
Methods and Measures, 15(2), 121-140.

5. Su, L. Y. F., Xenos, M. A., Rose, K. M., Wirz, C., Scheufele, D. A., & Brossard, D.
(2018). Uncivil and personal? Comparing patterns of incivility in comments
on the Facebook pages of news outlets. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3678-
3699.




1

, 1. Van Atteveldt & Peng (2018): When communication meets
computation: Opportunities, challenges, and pitfalls in
computational communications science

The role of computational methods in communication science

Development for the use of computational methods for communication science:
1. Deluge of digitally available data, ranging from social media messages and other
‘digital traces’ to web archives and newly digitized newspaper and other historical
archives
2. Improved tools to analyze this data, including:
o Network analysis methods
o Automatic text analysis methods:
 Supervised text classification
 Topic modelling
 Word embeddings
 Syntactic methods
3. Emerge of powerful and cheap processing power, and easy to use computing
infrastructure for processing these data, including:
o Scientific and commercial cloud computing
o Sharing platforms = Github. Dataverse
o Crowd coding platforms = Amazon MTurk, Crowdflower

Three developments:
- Potential to give an unprecedented boost to progress in communication science
- Overcome technical, social, and ethical challenges presented by developments

Computational communication science studies involve:
1. Large and complex datasets
2. Consisting of digital traces and other ‘naturally occurring’ data
3. Requiring algorithmic solutions to analyze
4. Allowing the study of human communication by applying and testing communication
theory

Computational methods:
- Not replacement of methodological approaches = complementation
- Distinction between classical and computational methods = boundaries are fuzzy

Opportunities offered by computational methods

Computational methods allow us to change our discipline in four ways:
1. From self-report to real behavior
o Help overcome social desirability problems
o It does not rely on people’s imperfect estimate of their own desires and
intentions
o Help overcome problems of linking content data to survey data:
 Bias in media self-reports
 News consumers cherry-pick articles from multiple sites
2. From lab experiments to studies of the actual social environment

2

, o Emergence of social media:
 Facilitates design and implementation of experiment research
 Crowd surfing platforms lowers obstacles in research subject
recruitment
o Fear of losing reputation = companies are reluctant in sharing data
o Coordination of experiments on social media = time-consuming
o Ethical issue = how to address these concerns involved in online experiments
3. From small N to large N
o Possibility to study subtle relations in smaller subpopulations
o Measuring messages/behavior in real-time:
 More fine-grained time series can be constructed
 Alleviating problems of simultaneous correlation
 Stronger case for finding casual mechanisms
o Machine learning research:
 Model selection and model shrinkage
 Examples of models = penalized (lasso) regression and cross-
validation
 Advantages:
 More parsimonious models
 Alleviate problems of overfitting that can occur with large
datasets
o Modeling of network and group dynamics:
 Exponential Random Graph Modeling (ERGM)
 Relational Event Modeling (REM)
4. From solitary to collaborative research:
o Digital data and computational tools:
 Easier to share and reuse resources
 Very hard for one researcher to do all steps of computational research
alone
o Advantages:
 Be more rigorous in defining operationalizations
 Documenting data and analysis process
 Furthering transparency and reproducibility of research
o Digital methods = bring quantitative and qualitative research closer together

Challenges and pitfalls in computational methods

Challenges and pitfalls of new methods:
1. How do we keep research datasets accessible?
o Privileged access = only researchers with a lot of connections get access to the
data
o Importance of open and transparent datasets:
 Stimulation of sharing and publishing datasets
 AmCAT = helps alleviate copyright restrictions
 Working with funding agencies and data providers to make
standardized datasets available
2. Is ‘big’ data always good data?
o Limitations of bigger data:
 It is found, while survey data is made:

3

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
lottebartelds Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
139
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
119
Documents
14
Last sold
2 weeks ago

4.1

17 reviews

5
8
4
5
3
3
2
0
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions