100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Overig

ETHC 445N Week 8 Assignment; Your Personal Moral Theory

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
1
Pagina's
5
Geüpload op
30-10-2021
Geschreven in
2021/2022

ETHC445N Week 8 Assignment: YourPersonal Moral Theory Introduction In this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of thatyou either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought toethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held. You will be focusing on this case for this assignment: Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: “Introduction to Ethics”. For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago(with a dierent professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John’s professor never checked anywork in the class using T. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also. In week two, Jane went to StudentP and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student(not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived workis of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied. Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for theweek two assignment. In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingS ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay afterJane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions. In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by aprofessor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using MoogleTranslate, and the translated text served as her week four paper. In week ve, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would laterclaim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she haddone the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen anylate penalty assessed. In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussionposting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago(even though University X forbids this practice as ‘self-plagiarism’). Jane was condent her Nursing instructornever checked that work using T or another method. In week seven, Jane copied and pasted work found on for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was not by Jane. Since Jane’s Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using T or anothermethod, the professor graded all of Jane’s work unaware of Jane’s actions throughout the weeks of the class.Jane feels her actions are morally justied both because her economic situation requires her to work too muchto devote time to school (although other students are well-o enough to have such time) and her religion saysthat it okay for her to take such actions since a degree will benet her family (while Jane is aware that otherreligions of students in the same class forbid such actions). Instructions Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of thefollowing: • A written reflection • An oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show. • For the written reection, address Jane Doe’s and respond to the following: • Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two • ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two? • Apply to Jane Doe’s case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. • Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy. • Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain. • Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the “veil of ignorance” method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of diering religions and economic status). For the oral presentation, briey summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore yourprocess of transformation in this course. • Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interactionin discussions. • Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not Writing Requirements (APA format) • Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page) • 1-inch margins • Double spaced • 12-point Times New Roman font • Title page • References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

Meer zien Lees minder








Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
30 oktober 2021
Aantal pagina's
5
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Overig
Persoon
Onbekend

Onderwerpen

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
AcademicResources Walden University
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
272
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
239
Documenten
2229
Laatst verkocht
1 maand geleden

3.7

49 beoordelingen

5
19
4
13
3
7
2
2
1
8

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen