100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Samenvatting Literatuur Leerprocessen College 1, 2 en 3 (SOW-OWKM070)

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
3
Pagina's
28
Geüpload op
19-10-2021
Geschreven in
2021/2022

Samenvatting van de literatuur behorende bij college 1, 2 en 3 van Leerprocessen: Farley-Ripple, E., May, H., Karpyn, A., Tilley, K., & McDonough, K. (2018). Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual framework. Educational Researcher, 47, 235–245. Howard-Jones, P., Ott, M., Van Leeuwen, T., & De Smedt, B. (2015). The potential relevance of cognitive neuroscience for the development and use of technology-enhanced learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 40, 131–151. Penuel, W. R., & Frank, K. A. (2016). Modes of inquiry in educational psychology and learning sciences research. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed.) (pp. 16–28). New York: Routledge. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology,, 63, 1–29. Je kunt de paragraaf "Some alternative approaches" overslaan, dit hoort niet bij de tentamenstof Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40, 177–190. Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Wiemers, E. A., Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2015). What’s working in working memory training? An educational perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 617–633. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292. doi:10.1007/s Martin, S. (2014). Measuring cognitive load and cognition: metrics for technology-enhanced learning. Educational Research and Evaluation, 20, 592-621. doi:10.1080/.2014.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak










Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
19 oktober 2021
Aantal pagina's
28
Geschreven in
2021/2022
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

Leerprocessen Literatuur College 1 & 2

College 1 08-09-2021

Rethinking connections between research and practice in education: A conceptual
framework
Farley-Ripple, etc
- Problem of use of research in practice is complex  efforts to improve the quality of
education research have been considerable and are marked by the establishment of the
Institute for Education Sciences (IES) and an emphasis on the study of educational
approaches with rigorous research designs vs increased attention to the use of research
by practitioners at the administrative or implementation levels of the system
- Expectation: research identifies most effective practices, and when those are selected
and implemented, educational outcomes at local and national levels will improve; but
o Assumptions about the relationship between research and practice
 Research should be the basis of educational decision-making (but no,
other forms also)
 A clear and direct relationship exists between research and practice (but
research as form of evidence is not ‘value free’, different
interpretations; and timelines; and inconclusive or even contradictory
research)
 ‘use’ is ill-defined in both policy as well as research (instrumentally –
conceptually; strategic – symbolic) [practice is what practitioners
actually do and use when engaging with research]
 An inadequate conceptualization of use as practice risks
reducing evidence use to an administrative task rather than
multiple activities constituting a political and social practice
within a complex organizational process and will unlikely lead
to the strengthening of ties between research and practice
o Framework (below) is grounded in 3 key ideas
 Understanding of the problem is guided by early work on knowledge
utilization, and they draw on the ‘two communities’ metaphor to
explore gaps between the research and practice communities
 They define communities in specific ways – the research community:
primarily those responsible for generating scholarship that examines
educational processes and contexts; [producers: those in traditional
academic institutions as well as think-tanks but also acknowledge this
work takes place in a range of organizations, with varying contexts that
shape research production] – practice communities: the administrative
or implementation levels of the system, responsible for making
decisions that ultimately influence teaching and learning, thus potential
users of research (all school and district practitioners)
 Evidence-based practice (EBP) in schools (the practice of incorporating
evidence, broadly construed, into decision-making processes)

,- Evidence: ranging from no engagement in/with scientific research to substantially
inclusive of scientific research on the other
- Search and Dissemination: at one end of the search continuum, users or producers may
do a very limited search or focus on a resource with which they are already familiar; at
the other end, they may seek out multiple sources or/for research
- Interpretation: the continuum of interpretation seeks to better articulate the strategies
and extent to which decision-makers interpret/generate research in informed and
critical ways
- Participation: understanding participation then entails a continuum in which one or
few individuals are engaged at one end and where collaborative groups spanning
organizational (as well as research and practice) boundaries are engaged on the other
- Frequency: indicator of the extent to which use and production are part of
organizational routines and processes
- Decision stage: important to understand whether and how researchers anticipate their
work to be useful in the decision-making process
- Gaps:
o Usefulness of research products: represents the degree to which products
produced and valued by researchers aligns with those preferred by practitioners
o Nature and quality of research: pertains to differences in how the two
communities value different qualities of research, including issues related to
internal and external validity as well as conclusiveness of findings
o Problems addressed by research: issues related to the relevance of research

, o Structure, process, and incentives: the context in which researches and
practitioners operate and what influences researchers to produce certain kinds
of research and what influences practitioners to use research or other evidence
o Relationships between communities: producer pushed (dissemination), user-
pulled (active search by users), and exchange (interaction between users and
producers during key processes); indirect relationships (research brokers,
intermediaries, boundary spanners)

The potential relevance of cognitive neuroscience for the development and use of
technology-enhanced learning
Howard-Jones, etc
- Technology-enhanced learning = TEL
- In neuroscience, learning is often synonymous with memory
o Forming connections between ideas (which we all agree to happen in de mind)
is not the same as forming connections between neurons in the brain, although
changes in neural connectivity are likely to be necessary
- In education, learning is often considered as happening between people, rather than
just inside of their brains




- Electroencephalography (EEG) measures the electrical field near the scalp generated
by neural processing, which generates at least four distinct rhythms
o Excellent temporal resolution
o Non-invasive
o Poor spatial resolution
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) – participant placed in scanner
o Good spatial resolution
o Slower temporal resolution

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
sophiet1 Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
16
Lid sinds
4 jaar
Aantal volgers
11
Documenten
7
Laatst verkocht
3 jaar geleden

2.0

1 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
1
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen