100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

MTH/216T: QUANTITATIVE REASONING II: WEEK 5: FINAL EXAM

Rating
2.0
(2)
Sold
23
Pages
4
Grade
A
Uploaded on
30-08-2021
Written in
2021/2022

MTH/216T: QUANTITATIVE REASONING II: WEEK 5: FINAL EXAM









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 30, 2021
Number of pages
4
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

Content preview

MTH/216T: QUANTITATIVE REASONING II: WEEK 5: FINAL EXAM 1.What is the average?
3458
A) 2B) 4C) 5D) 10
Answer: C) 5
2.What is the median of these figure skating ratings?
6.06.07.07.07.08.09.0
A) 6.0B) 7.0C) 7.1D) 8.0
Answer: B) 7.0
3.Two owners of a cattle ranch, Jo and Val, want to find the average weight for the ranch’s 200
cows. Instead of weighing all of the cows:
Jo weighs 25 and gets an average weight of 1,350 pounds (stdev 50)
Val weighs 100 cows and gets an average weight of 1,420 pounds (stdev 50)
What is Jo’s margin of error, rounded to the nearest whole number? (The formula is )
A) 10B) 20C) 50D) 529
Answer: B) 20
4.A media personality argues that global temperatures are not rising, because every year an increase is reported such as 0.08 degrees C. The difference from the previous year is less than the margin of error of about 0.15 degrees C, so that difference should be ignored. What is a strong counter argument?
A)Even 0.08 degrees is a lot and thus should be considered.
B)The margin of error is just extra information and thus can be ignored.
C)The difference with any previous decade is much greater than the margin of error.
D)0.15 - 0.08 is 0.07, which is still an increase and thus should be considered.
Answer: C) The difference with any previous decade is much greater than the margin of error.

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
2 year ago

1 year ago

Thank you for the feedback and I am so sorry for the inconvenience. I will work towards making the paper more efficient.

3 year ago

2.0

2 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
reviewnurse Chamberlain College Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1462
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
1406
Documents
4849
Last sold
3 months ago
NURSING, ECONOMICS, MATHEMATICS AND HISTORY MATERIALS

BEST TUTORING, HOMEWORK HELP, EXAMS, TESTS AND STUDY GUIDE MATERIALS WITH GUARANTEE OF A+ I am a dedicated medical practitioner with diverse knowledge in matters Nursing and Mathematics. I also have an additional knowledge in Mathematics based courses (finance and economics)

3.7

249 reviews

5
121
4
41
3
29
2
19
1
39

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions