100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Interdisciplinary Themes in Food & Sustainability - Answers Exam Pool 1 (YSS-33806)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
6
Uploaded on
13-07-2021
Written in
2020/2021

Answers to the exam questions from exam pool 1 for the YSS-33806 Interdisciplinary Themes in Food and Sustainability course. This course is mandatory for the master MME MSc Management, Economics and Consumer Studies. At the exam, 5 questions from exam pools 1 and 2 literally came back. With these answers to the exam pool questions, I got an 8.5 for the exam.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 13, 2021
Number of pages
6
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

Pool of possible exam questions of YSS33806 (2020-2021)
Session 1 (PP and two articles):

1. a) What is the main difference between interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary
research? (powerpoint)
Interdisciplinary research is (multidisciplinary) research within academia.
Goal: learning, new ideas.

Transdisciplinary research is research that goes beyond academia and involves stakeholders
from policy, civil society etc.
Goal: problem oriented.

b) Would you qualify the social and environmental audits conducted by
Zeeman (as presented by Kelly Kristelijn at session 7B) as an example of
transdisciplinary research? Please explain.
Social and environmental audits for Zeeman, are conducted by an independent third party at
different 250 points. These audits result in CAPs (corrective action plans), which contain advice
for non-conformances. These audits can be qualified as an example of transdisciplinary
research, because these audits go beyond academia and involve different stakeholders
(factory workers, suppliers, local policy makers). Besides, the aim of these audits is to discover
and solve problems/non-conformances, which is a characteristic of transdisciplinary research,
namely that is it problem oriented.

2. Based on his review of literature and research projects, Hospes distinguished
three pre- conditions for successful interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary
research. What are these three pre-conditions?
Precondition 1) recognition and respect for different knowledge systems is required.
Precondition 2) some kind of umbrella or bridging concept is needed to guide the process of
knowledge co-creation.
Precondition 3) institutional and personal incentive structures need to be (made) compatible.

3. Please explain why and how the concept of risk can serve as a bridging
concept in transdisciplinary research.
o Why: it has links across scientific disciplines, shared/mutual understanding across
disciplines. Besides, Risk is well-positioned to act as a bridging concept between
different scientific disciplines and practitioners due to its broad scope, focus on solving
real-world problems, and integration of natural and social science.
o How: facilitating communication and understanding across disciplines, coordinates
stakeholders and build consensus around a particular policy issue. Made relevant in the
context of corporate practice (Ahlström). And, through co-created activities, it is possible
to use risk as bridging concept in transdisciplinary research collaboration for corporate
sustainability.




4. Ahlstrom et al. (2020) refer to two common approaches to integrating research
and practice in their article on systems thinking and transdisciplinary approaches:

1

, “first of all, using the input from laypersons in scientific research while
maintaining the ‘primacy of science’, and secondly using research as input in
decision support, ensuring the ‘primacy of practice”. Suppose these two
approaches are two extremes of a continuum. Where would Ahlstrom et al. (2020)
position transdisciplinary approaches? Please explain.
Ahlström et al. (2020), would position transdisciplinary approaches on neither ends of the
continuum. They would position it somewhere in the middle. Ahlström et al. (2020) argue that
neither the hierarchical superiority of either academics’ or practitioners’ knowledge should be
accepted, but the focus should be on the interesting co-benefits of how they complement each
other.

Session 2 (PP):

1. In his on-line lecture Hospes presented 11 differences between CSR and RBC.
Please mention five.
CSR RBC
Difference 1 Formulated as a ‘Why-question’ Formulated as a ‘How-
question’
Difference 2 Norm Conduct
Difference 3 Voluntary regulation Due diligence becomes
binding
Difference 4 Social Social and environmental
Difference 5 International private business self-regulation International public regulation

2. A key element of RBC is the due diligence process.
a) What is due diligence?
Due diligence = “The steps that a company must take to become aware of, prevent and
address adverse impact.”

b) CSR can be seen as international private business self-regulation. In what step
of the due diligence process, CSR could possibly be used or referred to? Please
explain.

CSR can be used/referred to in step 1 of the due diligence process. Step 1: “Embed
responsible business conduct into policies and management systems.”
In the first step of the Due Diligence Management process, you embed RBC policies in your
company’s management systems to make sure that these policies become part of your regular
business processes.




2

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
jonathanvdb Wageningen University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
28
Member since
8 year
Number of followers
21
Documents
0
Last sold
2 year ago

English below Beste medestudenten op Stuvia! Bedankt dat je mijn profiel bekijkt. Ik verkoop samenvattingen voor vakken uit de master Management, Economics and Consumer Studies aan de WUR. Met mijn samenvattingen en jouw inzet heb je een grotere kans om het tentamen te halen! 5 sterren beoordelingen op de samenvattingen worden gewaardeerd! ---- Dear students on Stuvia! Thank you for visiting my profile. I share and sell summaries for different courses from the master Management, Economics and Consumer Studies at the WUR. With help of my summaries and your own effort, you will become more likely to get an excellent grade for your exam. 5-star reviews on my documents are very appreciated.

Read more Read less
4.0

2 reviews

5
0
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions