Page 1 of 179
NYC Associate Fraud Investigator EXAM
COMPLETE 300 QUESTIONS WITH DETAILED
SOLUTIONS JUST RELEASED THIS YEAR
NYC Associate Fraud Investigator Exam – 300 Randomized Practice Questions
Exam Overview
The NYC Associate Fraud Investigator civil service examination (Exam No. 4013) is administered
by the NYC Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS). Key details:
• Application Fee: $82.00
• Test Format: Multiple-choice
• Passing Score: 70% required to pass
• Salary Range: $80,362 – $106,022 (Assignment Level I); $88,793 – $111,082
(Assignment Level II)
• Minimum Qualifications: High school diploma + 5 years investigative experience (1 year
supervisory); OR associate degree + 3 years experience; OR bachelor's degree + 2 years
experience
Job Role: Associate Fraud Investigators perform complex investigations of fraud involving social
benefit programs (SNAP, Medicaid, housing), tax laws, procurement, payroll, and
timekeeping. They conduct surveillance, interviews, data mining, preserve evidence, write
reports, and testify at administrative hearings.
Eligibility: Open to the public. Promotion exams are also available for current Fraud
Investigators.
Summarized Exam Coverage
The NYC Associate Fraud Investigator exam tests the following core areas:
1
SUCCESS!
,Page 2 of 179
1. Fraud Investigation Fundamentals – Defining fraud, types of fraud, elements of fraud,
and the fraud triangle (Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization)
2. NYC Benefit Program Fraud – SNAP, Cash Assistance, Medicaid, and Housing fraud
schemes
3. Investigative Techniques – Surveillance methods, evidence collection, chain of custody,
field operations, interviewing and interrogation
4. Evidence Handling – Evidence preservation, chain of custody, lawful access, admissibility
5. Financial Records Analysis – Auditing, bank records, payroll analysis, detecting red flags
6. NYC Rules and Conflict of Interest Laws – Local statutes, ethical conduct, conflicts of
interest
7. Report Writing and Documentation – Investigative reports, case files, documentation
standards
8. Testifying – Administrative hearings, court testimony, hearsay rules
9. Criminal Law – New York Penal Law, grand larceny, fraud offenses
10. Data Analysis and Digital Fraud – Data mining, digital evidence tracking
2
SUCCESS!
,Page 3 of 179
300 Randomized Practice Questions
1. What is the primary purpose of a fraud investigation?
A) To obtain a confession from the subject
B) To establish facts and determine whether improper conduct occurred
C) To punish the subject of the investigation
D) To guarantee criminal prosecution
Answer: B
Rationale: An investigator's primary responsibility is to establish and evaluate facts objectively. A
confession or prosecution may occur in some cases, but neither is the fundamental purpose of
the investigation.
2. Which approach is most appropriate when an investigator receives an allegation?
A) Assume the allegation is true
B) Assume the allegation is false
C) Evaluate the allegation and develop investigative leads
D) Immediately confront the subject
3
SUCCESS!
, Page 4 of 179
Answer: C
Rationale: An allegation is an assertion, not a proven fact. The investigator should assess its
credibility, identify relevant evidence, and develop appropriate leads.
3. Which statement best distinguishes a fact from an inference?
A) A fact is always more important than evidence
B) An inference is a conclusion drawn from facts or evidence
C) An inference is always incorrect
D) Facts are based on opinions
Answer: B
Rationale: Facts are established pieces of information, while an inference is a conclusion
reasonably drawn from those facts. Investigators should distinguish the two in their reports.
4. What is investigative corroboration?
A) Repeating the same allegation
B) Confirming information through an independent source
4
SUCCESS!
NYC Associate Fraud Investigator EXAM
COMPLETE 300 QUESTIONS WITH DETAILED
SOLUTIONS JUST RELEASED THIS YEAR
NYC Associate Fraud Investigator Exam – 300 Randomized Practice Questions
Exam Overview
The NYC Associate Fraud Investigator civil service examination (Exam No. 4013) is administered
by the NYC Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS). Key details:
• Application Fee: $82.00
• Test Format: Multiple-choice
• Passing Score: 70% required to pass
• Salary Range: $80,362 – $106,022 (Assignment Level I); $88,793 – $111,082
(Assignment Level II)
• Minimum Qualifications: High school diploma + 5 years investigative experience (1 year
supervisory); OR associate degree + 3 years experience; OR bachelor's degree + 2 years
experience
Job Role: Associate Fraud Investigators perform complex investigations of fraud involving social
benefit programs (SNAP, Medicaid, housing), tax laws, procurement, payroll, and
timekeeping. They conduct surveillance, interviews, data mining, preserve evidence, write
reports, and testify at administrative hearings.
Eligibility: Open to the public. Promotion exams are also available for current Fraud
Investigators.
Summarized Exam Coverage
The NYC Associate Fraud Investigator exam tests the following core areas:
1
SUCCESS!
,Page 2 of 179
1. Fraud Investigation Fundamentals – Defining fraud, types of fraud, elements of fraud,
and the fraud triangle (Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization)
2. NYC Benefit Program Fraud – SNAP, Cash Assistance, Medicaid, and Housing fraud
schemes
3. Investigative Techniques – Surveillance methods, evidence collection, chain of custody,
field operations, interviewing and interrogation
4. Evidence Handling – Evidence preservation, chain of custody, lawful access, admissibility
5. Financial Records Analysis – Auditing, bank records, payroll analysis, detecting red flags
6. NYC Rules and Conflict of Interest Laws – Local statutes, ethical conduct, conflicts of
interest
7. Report Writing and Documentation – Investigative reports, case files, documentation
standards
8. Testifying – Administrative hearings, court testimony, hearsay rules
9. Criminal Law – New York Penal Law, grand larceny, fraud offenses
10. Data Analysis and Digital Fraud – Data mining, digital evidence tracking
2
SUCCESS!
,Page 3 of 179
300 Randomized Practice Questions
1. What is the primary purpose of a fraud investigation?
A) To obtain a confession from the subject
B) To establish facts and determine whether improper conduct occurred
C) To punish the subject of the investigation
D) To guarantee criminal prosecution
Answer: B
Rationale: An investigator's primary responsibility is to establish and evaluate facts objectively. A
confession or prosecution may occur in some cases, but neither is the fundamental purpose of
the investigation.
2. Which approach is most appropriate when an investigator receives an allegation?
A) Assume the allegation is true
B) Assume the allegation is false
C) Evaluate the allegation and develop investigative leads
D) Immediately confront the subject
3
SUCCESS!
, Page 4 of 179
Answer: C
Rationale: An allegation is an assertion, not a proven fact. The investigator should assess its
credibility, identify relevant evidence, and develop appropriate leads.
3. Which statement best distinguishes a fact from an inference?
A) A fact is always more important than evidence
B) An inference is a conclusion drawn from facts or evidence
C) An inference is always incorrect
D) Facts are based on opinions
Answer: B
Rationale: Facts are established pieces of information, while an inference is a conclusion
reasonably drawn from those facts. Investigators should distinguish the two in their reports.
4. What is investigative corroboration?
A) Repeating the same allegation
B) Confirming information through an independent source
4
SUCCESS!
