Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Business law lecture notes

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
3
Uploaded on
03-07-2021
Written in
2020/2021

Business law lecture notes

Institution
Course

Content preview

Shareholders’ Agreement

The articles as a contract:
Section 33 CA 2006
■ (1) The provisions of a company's constitution bind the company and its members to
the same extent as if there were covenants on the part of the company and of each
member to observe those provisions.
■ (2) Money payable by a member to the company under its constitution is a debt
due from him to the company.
■ In England and Wales and Northern Ireland it is of the nature of an ordinary contract
debt.
The Contractual Effect of the articles: s.33
■ Funny looking contract:
■ Privity: future shareholders ?
■ Alteration: unanimity not required
■ Allows share transfers
■ Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep–Breeders Association [1915] 1 Ch 881
shareholder bound as against the company

Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheepbreeders’ Association
■ Astbury J “articles regulating the rights and obligations of the members generally as
such do create rights and obligations between them and the company respectively.”
■ Here the company enforced an arbitration clause in the articles against a member
BUT only rights in the articles given to person in the capacity of a member
enforceable
■ Articles regulating the rights and obligations of members generally as such do
create…

Special features of the s. 33 contract
■ Bratton Seymour Service Ltd v Oxborough [1992] BCLC 693
■ How to construe the articles?
■ How to imply a term?
■ Are background facts admissible? NO

Problems of enforcement of certain types of article by a member against a company
■ Eley v Positive Government Security Life Assurance Co Ltd (1876) 1 Ex D 88
■ Salmon v Quinn & Axtens Ltd [1909] 1 Ch 311 & [1909] AC 442

Member against Member
■ Rayfield v Hands [1960] Ch 1 cf Lord Herschell in Welton v Saffrey [1897] AC 299
■ Also remember Wood v Odessa
■ And think again about Salmon v Quinn & Axtens

Alteration: The common law requirement
Need a special resolution (75%) to alter the articles
SR must be passed bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole: Allen v Gold Reefs
of West Africa Ltd [1900] 1 Ch 656

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
July 3, 2021
Number of pages
3
Written in
2020/2021
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$11.64
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
soumaiadjellak

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
soumaiadjellak City University
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
1
Documents
53
Last sold
5 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions