Kaplan & Sadock Synopsis of Psychia
I I I I I f!
try Updated 12th Edition_test_bank 2
I I I I f!
023 GRADED A+ I I
KaplanI&ISadock'sISynopsisIofIPsychiatryIEditionI12TestBank !f !f
ChapterI 1.ExaminationandDiagnosisI ofI theI PsychiatricIPat i
f! !f f! !f f! f! f! f!
entIMultiple Choicef!
IdentifyIthe choice that best completesItheI statementIorIanswersItheI question.
f! f! f! f!
1. AInurseIisIassessingIaI clientIwhoIisIexperiencingoccasional feeli !f f! f!
ngsofIsadnessI becauseIofItheI recentIdeath ofIaIbelovedIpet.ITheIclient’s appetite,sleepI pa t
f! f! f! f!
terns,I and dailyI routineI have not changed. HowI shouldI the nurse interprettheclient’sIb eh
f! f! f! f! f! f! !f !f f!
aviors?
1. Theclient’s behaviorsdemonstrateI
!f f! f! f!
mental illnessintheIformofIdepress i
f! f! !f !f f!
on.
2. TheIclient’sIbehaviorsIareIextensive,Iwh f!
ichI indicatesItheI presenceIofImentalIillne
f!
ss.
f!
3. The client’sbehaviorsare notIcongruent
f! f! f! f! f!
with culturalnorms.
f! !f
4. The client’s behaviors demonstrate noIf
f! f! f! f! f!
unctional impairment, indicatingInom
f! f! !f f!
entalillness. !f
, 2. At what point should the nurse determine that a client isIat riskfor de
f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f!
velopingamental illness?
!f f! f!
1. When thoughts, feelings, and behaviorsar
f! f! f! f! !f
e not reflective ofthe DSM-5 criteria.
f! f! f! !f f! f!
2. Whenmaladaptive responsesItostressIa r
!f f! !f f!
eIcoupledIwithIinterferenceIinIdailyIfun f!
ctioning.
3. WhenI aI clientIcommunicatesIs
ignificantI distress.
f!
4. WhenIaI client usesI defenseImechanismsIa
f! f
sIegoIprotection.
!
3. A nurse isIassessingIaIsetIofI15-year-
f! f!
old identicalItwins whorespond veryIdifferentlyItoI stress.I OneItwinIbecomesIanxiousI a
f! f! f! f!
ndIirritable,IandI theIother withdrawsIandIcries.IHowIshouldItheInurseIexplainthese diff
f! !f f! f!
erentIstressresponsesItoItheparents?
!f !f
1. ReactionsItoIstressIare relativeIratherIth f! f
anI absolute;Iindividual responsesItoIstr
! f! f!
essIvary.
2. ItIisIabnormalIforIidentical twinsItoIre f! f
actI differentlyItoIsimilar stressors.
! f!
, 3. Identical twinsshouldshare thesame tem
f! !f !f !f !f f! !f
peramentIandrespondsimilarlytostr ess !f !f !f !f f!
.
4. Environmental influences toI stress f! f! f!
weigh more heavilythan genetic infl
f! f! !f f! f! !f
uences.
1. ReactionsItoIstressIareIrelativeIratherIth f
anI absolute;IindividualI responsesItoIstr
! f!
essIvary.
2. ItIisIabnormal for identicalItwinsItoIre f! f! f!
actI differentlytoIsimilarIstressors. !f
3. IdenticalItwinsIshouldIshareItheIsameIte
mperamentIandIrespondIsimilarlyItoIstr
f!
ess.
f!
4. EnvironmentalI influences toI stressI f! f
weighI moreIheavilythan geneticIin
! !f f! f
fluences.
!
4. Which clientI shouldItheI nurseI anticipateItoIbeI mostre
f! f
! ceptiveItopsychiatric treatment?
!f f!
1. AIJewish,Ifemale social worker. f! f!
2. AIBaptist, homeless male.f! f!
3. AICatholic, black male. f! f!
4. AIProtestant,SwedishIbusinessIexecutive. !f
5. AIpsychiatricInurse intern states,I “ThisIclient’sI useofIdefensem
f! f! I ec !f f!
hanismsIshouldIbeIeliminated.”IWhichIisIaIcorrectevaluationIofIthisnurse’sIstatement
!f f!
?
1. Defense mechanismscanbeIapprop
f! !f !f f!
riate responsesIto stress andneedno t
f! f! f! !f f! !f
be
eliminated.
, 2. Defense mechanisms areamaladaptive
f! f! !f !f !f f
attempt oftheego tomanage anxietyan
! f! !f !f f! f! f! !f
d should always beeliminated.
f! f! f!
3. Defense mechanisms, usedbyindivid
f! f! !f !f !f
uals withIweakIegoIintegrity,should
f! f!
be
discouragedIandI notI eliminated.
I I I I I f!
try Updated 12th Edition_test_bank 2
I I I I f!
023 GRADED A+ I I
KaplanI&ISadock'sISynopsisIofIPsychiatryIEditionI12TestBank !f !f
ChapterI 1.ExaminationandDiagnosisI ofI theI PsychiatricIPat i
f! !f f! !f f! f! f! f!
entIMultiple Choicef!
IdentifyIthe choice that best completesItheI statementIorIanswersItheI question.
f! f! f! f!
1. AInurseIisIassessingIaI clientIwhoIisIexperiencingoccasional feeli !f f! f!
ngsofIsadnessI becauseIofItheI recentIdeath ofIaIbelovedIpet.ITheIclient’s appetite,sleepI pa t
f! f! f! f!
terns,I and dailyI routineI have not changed. HowI shouldI the nurse interprettheclient’sIb eh
f! f! f! f! f! f! !f !f f!
aviors?
1. Theclient’s behaviorsdemonstrateI
!f f! f! f!
mental illnessintheIformofIdepress i
f! f! !f !f f!
on.
2. TheIclient’sIbehaviorsIareIextensive,Iwh f!
ichI indicatesItheI presenceIofImentalIillne
f!
ss.
f!
3. The client’sbehaviorsare notIcongruent
f! f! f! f! f!
with culturalnorms.
f! !f
4. The client’s behaviors demonstrate noIf
f! f! f! f! f!
unctional impairment, indicatingInom
f! f! !f f!
entalillness. !f
, 2. At what point should the nurse determine that a client isIat riskfor de
f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f! f!
velopingamental illness?
!f f! f!
1. When thoughts, feelings, and behaviorsar
f! f! f! f! !f
e not reflective ofthe DSM-5 criteria.
f! f! f! !f f! f!
2. Whenmaladaptive responsesItostressIa r
!f f! !f f!
eIcoupledIwithIinterferenceIinIdailyIfun f!
ctioning.
3. WhenI aI clientIcommunicatesIs
ignificantI distress.
f!
4. WhenIaI client usesI defenseImechanismsIa
f! f
sIegoIprotection.
!
3. A nurse isIassessingIaIsetIofI15-year-
f! f!
old identicalItwins whorespond veryIdifferentlyItoI stress.I OneItwinIbecomesIanxiousI a
f! f! f! f!
ndIirritable,IandI theIother withdrawsIandIcries.IHowIshouldItheInurseIexplainthese diff
f! !f f! f!
erentIstressresponsesItoItheparents?
!f !f
1. ReactionsItoIstressIare relativeIratherIth f! f
anI absolute;Iindividual responsesItoIstr
! f! f!
essIvary.
2. ItIisIabnormalIforIidentical twinsItoIre f! f
actI differentlyItoIsimilar stressors.
! f!
, 3. Identical twinsshouldshare thesame tem
f! !f !f !f !f f! !f
peramentIandrespondsimilarlytostr ess !f !f !f !f f!
.
4. Environmental influences toI stress f! f! f!
weigh more heavilythan genetic infl
f! f! !f f! f! !f
uences.
1. ReactionsItoIstressIareIrelativeIratherIth f
anI absolute;IindividualI responsesItoIstr
! f!
essIvary.
2. ItIisIabnormal for identicalItwinsItoIre f! f! f!
actI differentlytoIsimilarIstressors. !f
3. IdenticalItwinsIshouldIshareItheIsameIte
mperamentIandIrespondIsimilarlyItoIstr
f!
ess.
f!
4. EnvironmentalI influences toI stressI f! f
weighI moreIheavilythan geneticIin
! !f f! f
fluences.
!
4. Which clientI shouldItheI nurseI anticipateItoIbeI mostre
f! f
! ceptiveItopsychiatric treatment?
!f f!
1. AIJewish,Ifemale social worker. f! f!
2. AIBaptist, homeless male.f! f!
3. AICatholic, black male. f! f!
4. AIProtestant,SwedishIbusinessIexecutive. !f
5. AIpsychiatricInurse intern states,I “ThisIclient’sI useofIdefensem
f! f! I ec !f f!
hanismsIshouldIbeIeliminated.”IWhichIisIaIcorrectevaluationIofIthisnurse’sIstatement
!f f!
?
1. Defense mechanismscanbeIapprop
f! !f !f f!
riate responsesIto stress andneedno t
f! f! f! !f f! !f
be
eliminated.
, 2. Defense mechanisms areamaladaptive
f! f! !f !f !f f
attempt oftheego tomanage anxietyan
! f! !f !f f! f! f! !f
d should always beeliminated.
f! f! f!
3. Defense mechanisms, usedbyindivid
f! f! !f !f !f
uals withIweakIegoIintegrity,should
f! f!
be
discouragedIandI notI eliminated.