Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 93 pages
Exam (elaborations)

CPH Comprehensive Practice Exam Set 2 | Certified in Public Health Questions & Answers 2026/2027

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 93 pages

Dominate your public health credentialing milestone with this comprehensive Set 2 practice exam package, fully updated for the testing cycle. This premium study resource delivers critical questions and verified answers covering core competencies like epidemiology, behavioral science, biostatistics, environmental health, and health policy. Every problem includes a deeply analytical clinical and systemic rationale, ensuring you achieve the mandatory benchmark score on your official NBPHE examination.

Content preview

CPH - COMPREHENSIVE PRACTICE EXAM SET 2
VERIFIED QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 2026-2027


Overview
This comprehensive practice exam contains verified-style CPH questions covering all
core domains: Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Environmental Health, Health Policy &
Management, Social & Behavioral Sciences, and Program Planning/Evaluation. Each
question includes a detailed rationale to reinforce understanding of key concepts tested
on the 2026 CPH blueprint. Use this to systematically assess your knowledge, identify
weak areas, and build exam confidence.

Question 1
A researcher is analyzing data from a longitudinal study and finds that the correlation
between physical activity and BMI is –0.65. This indicates:

A) A weak positive association
B) A strong positive association
C) A strong negative association
D) No association

Rationale: Correlation coefficients range from –1 to +1. A value of –0.65 indicates a
moderately strong negative (inverse) relationship – as physical activity increases, BMI
tends to decrease. Values near 0 indicate no association, and positive values indicate direct
relationships.




Question 2
In a community health assessment, which type of data would be considered "primary
data"?

A) Birth certificates from the state vital records office
B) A survey administered by the health department to local residents
C) National cancer registry statistics
D) Hospital discharge data from the state health department

Rationale: Primary data are collected firsthand by the researcher for the specific study
purpose. A survey designed and administered by the health department is primary data.

,Vital records, cancer registries, and hospital discharge data are secondary data collected
by others.




Question 3
A public health program aims to increase vaccination rates among preschoolers. Which
evaluation design would best establish causality?

A) Pre-post design without a control group
B) Randomized controlled trial
C) Time-series design
D) Cross-sectional survey

Rationale: The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the gold standard for establishing
causality because randomization balances confounders and ensures the intervention
precedes the outcome. Pre-post and time-series lack a concurrent control group, and
cross-sectional designs cannot establish temporality.




Question 4
Which of the following is a common measure of disease frequency that accounts for the
time each person is at risk?

A) Prevalence
B) Cumulative incidence
C) Incidence rate (incidence density)
D) Attack rate

Rationale: Incidence rate (incidence density) includes person-time in the denominator,
accounting for varying follow-up times. Prevalence is a proportion at a point in time,
cumulative incidence assumes complete follow-up, and attack rate is a type of cumulative
incidence for outbreaks.

,Question 5
A screening test has a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 90%. If the disease
prevalence is 2%, what is the positive predictive value (PPV)?

A) Approximately 85%
B) Approximately 90%
C) Approximately 15%
D) Approximately 50%

Rationale: PPV = (sensitivity × prevalence) / [(sensitivity × prevalence) + (1 – specificity) ×
(1 – prevalence)]. With low prevalence, PPV is low despite high sensitivity/specificity. PPV
≈ (0.85×0.02)/[(0.85×0.02)+(0.10×0.98)] = 0.017/0.115 ≈ 14.8%. This illustrates why
screening rare diseases yields many false positives.




Question 6
The "social determinants of health" framework emphasizes that health is most
influenced by:

A) Genetic predisposition
B) The conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age
C) Access to medical care alone
D) Individual lifestyle choices only

Rationale: The WHO defines SDOH as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live,
work, and age – shaped by the distribution of money, power, and resources. While
genetics, healthcare, and lifestyle matter, SDOH are the upstream drivers of health
inequities.




Question 7
Which statistical test would be appropriate to compare the median age between two
independent groups when the data are not normally distributed?

A) T-test
B) ANOVA
C) Mann-Whitney U test
D) Pearson correlation

, Rationale: The Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon rank-sum) is a non-parametric test for
comparing medians between two independent groups when normality is violated. The t-
test assumes normality, ANOVA is for ≥3 groups, and correlation measures association,
not group differences.




Question 8
A case-control study is conducted to investigate the association between processed
meat consumption and colorectal cancer. Which measure of association is most
appropriate?

A) Relative risk
B) Odds ratio
C) Incidence rate ratio
D) Risk difference

Rationale: Case-control studies cannot directly calculate risk or incidence because the
denominator (at-risk population) is not known. The odds ratio is the appropriate measure,
approximating the relative risk when the disease is rare. Relative risk and incidence rate
ratio require cohort data.




Question 9
The "precautionary principle" would support which of the following actions?

A) Waiting for definitive scientific proof before regulating a suspected carcinogen
B) Implementing restrictions on a chemical with suspected health effects despite
incomplete evidence
C) Requiring cost-benefit analysis before any environmental action
D) Allowing industries to self-regulate until harm is proven

Rationale: The precautionary principle states that lack of full scientific certainty should not
postpone measures to prevent serious or irreversible harm. It shifts the burden of proof to
the proponent of the potentially harmful activity and supports early action even with
incomplete evidence.

Document information

Uploaded on
July 27, 2026
Number of pages
93
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$33.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
CornelWest
3.7
(248)
Sold
1565
Followers
1128
Items
12128
Last sold
3 days ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions