Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
Solution Manual For South-Western Federal Taxation
2026: Comprehensive Volume 50th Edition By James
Young, Annette Nellen, Mark Persellin , Sharon
Lassar, Andrew Cuccia Newest Edition 2026
D Want to earn $1.236
extra per year?
, Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
Solution And Answer Guide
RAABE, NELLEN, YOUNG, CRIPE, LASSAR, PERSELLIN, CUCCIA, SWFT CORPORATIONS , PARTNERSHIPS, ESTATES & TRUSTS 2024,
9780357900673; CHAPTER 1: UNDERSTANDINGAND WORKING WITH THE FEDERAL TAX LAW
TABLEOFCONTENTS
Discussion Questions ................................................................................................................................ 1
Problems ...........................................................................................................................................8
Research Problems ................................................................................................................................13
Check Figures ......................................................................................................................................15
Solutiontoethics & Equity Feature................................................................................................................ 16
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. (Lo 1) When Enacting Tax Legislation, Congress Often Is Guided By The Concept Of Revenue Neutrality So That
Any Changes Neither Increase Nor Decrease The Net Revenues Raised Under The Prior Rules. Revenue
Neutrality Does Not Mean That Any One Taxpayer’s Tax Liability Remains The Same. Since This Liability
Depends On The Circumstances Involved, One Taxpayer’s Increased Tax Liability Could Be Another’s Tax
Saving. Revenue- Neutral Tax Reform Does Not Reduce Deficits, But At Least It Does Not Aggravate The
Problem.
2. (Lo 2) Economic, Social, Equity, And Political Factors Play A Significant Role In The Formulation Of Tax
Laws. Furthermore, The Treasury Department, The Irs, And The Courts Have Had Impacts On The Evolution
Of Tax Laws. For Example, Control Of The Economy Has Been An Important Economic Consideration In
Passing A Number Of Laws (E.G., Rapid Depreciation, Changes In Tax Rates). But Ultimately The Tax
Law Is Written Bycongress.
3. (Lo 2) The Tax Law Encourages Technological Progress By Allowing Immediate (Or Accelerated)
Deductions And Tax Credits For Research And Development Expenditures.
4. (Lo 2) Saving Leads To Capital Formation And Makes Funds Available To Finance Home
Construction And Industrial Expansion. For Example, The Tax Laws Provide Incentives To
Encourage Savings By Giving Private Retirement Plans Preferential Treatment.
5. (Lo 2)
a. Code § 1244 Allows Ordinary Loss Treatment On The Worthlessness Of Small Business Corporation
Stock (Discussed In Chapter 4). Since This Stock Normally Would Be A Capital Asset, The Operation
Of § 1244 Converts A Less Desirable Capital Loss Into A More Attractive Ordinary Loss. This Tax
Treatment Was Designed To Aid Small Businesses In Raising Needed Capital Through The Issuance Of
Stock.
2
, Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
b. The S Corporation Election (See Footnote 5 And A Detailed Discussion In Chapter 12) Allows The Profits
(Or Losses) Of The Corporation To Flow Through To Its Individual Shareholders (Avoiding The
Corporate Income Tax). In Addition, The Qualified Business Income Deduction May Apply To Any
Flow-Through Profits (Allowing A Maximum 20% Deduction To The Shareholders). However, With
The Corporate Tax Rate Being 21% (And Individual Marginal Tax Rates Potentially Being Higher),
Individuals Need To Compare The Benefits Of Avoiding The Corporate Tax Rate With The Taxes On
Any S Corporation Flow-Through Profits.
6. (Lo 2) Reasonable Persons Can, And Often Do, Disagree About What Is Fair Or Unfair. In The Tax Area,
Moreover, Equity Is Generally Tied To A Particular Taxpayer’s Personal Situation. For Example, One
Equity Difference Relates To How A Business Is Organized (I.E., Partnership Versus Corporation). Two
Businesses May Be Equal In Size, Similarly Situated, And Competitors In The Production Of Goods Or
Services, But They May Not Becomparably Treated Under The Tax Law If One Is A Partnership And The
Other Is A Corporation. The Corporation Is Subject To A Separate Federal Income Tax Of 21%; The
Partnership Is Not. The Tax Law Can And Does Make A Distinction Between These Business Forms. Equity,
Then, Is Not What Appears Fair Or Unfair To Any One Taxpayer Or Group Of Taxpayers. Equity Is, Instead,
What The Tax Law Recognizes.
7. (Lo 2) This Deduction Can Be Explained By Social Considerations. The Deduction Shifts Some Of The
Financial And Administrative Burden Of Socially Desirable Programs From The Public (The
Government) Sector To The Private (The Citizens) Sector.
8. (Lo 2) Preferential Treatment Of Private Retirement Plans Encourages Saving. Not Only Are
Contributions To Keogh (H.R. 10) Plans And Certain Individual Retirement Accounts (Ira) Deductible,
But Income From These Contributions Accumulates On A Tax-Free Basis.
9. (Lo 2) The Availability Of Percentage Depletion On The Extraction And Sale Of Oil And Gas And Specified
Mineral Deposits And A Write-Off (Rather Than Capitalization) Of Certain Exploration Costs Encourage
The Development Of Natural Resources.
10. (Lo 2) Favorable Treatment Of Corporate Reorganizations Provides An Economic Benefit. By Allowing
Corporations To Combine And Split Without Adverse Consequences, Corporations Are In A Position To
Reduce Their Taxes And Possibly More Effectively Compete With Other Businesses (Both Nationally
And Internationally).
11. (Lo 2) Although The Major Objective Of The Federal Tax Law Is The Raising Of Revenue, Other
Considerations Explain Many Provisions. In Particular, Economic, Social, Equity, And Political Factors
Play A Significant Role. Added To These Factors Is The Impact The Treasury Department, The Internal
Revenue Service, And The Courts Have Had And Will Continue To Have On The Evolution Of Federal
Tax Law.
12. (Lo 2) The Deduction Allowed For Federal Income Tax Purposes For State And Local Income Taxes Is
Not Designed To Neutralize The Effect Of Multiple Taxation On The Same Income. At Most, This
Deduction Provides Only Partial Relief. The $10,000 Overall Limitation On State And Local Taxes Also
Reduces The Tax Benefit Of These Taxes. Only Allowing A Full Tax Credit Would Achieve Complete
Neutrality.
3
, Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
a. With The Standard Deduction, A Taxpayer Is Indirectly Obtaining The Benefit Of A Deduction For
Any State Or Local Income Taxes He Or She May Have Paid. The Standard Deduction Is In Lieu Of
Itemized Deductions, Which Include Any Allowed Deductions For State And Local Income
Taxes.
b. If The Taxpayer Is In The 10% Tax Bracket, $1 Of A Deduction For State Or Local Taxes Would Save
$0.10 Of Federal Income Tax Liability. In The 32% Tax Bracket, The Saving Becomes $0.32. The Deduction
Approach (As Opposed To The Allowance Of A Credit) Favors High-Bracket Taxpayers.
13. (Lo 2) Under The General Rule, A Transfer Of A Partnership’s Assets To A New Corporation Could Result
In A Taxable Gain. However, If Certain Conditions Are Met, § 351 Postpones The Recognition Of Any Gain
(Or Loss) On The Transfer Of Property By Heather To A Controlled Corporation (See Example 4).
The Wherewithal To Pay Concept Recognizes The Inequity Of Taxing A Transaction When Heather Lacks
The Means With Which To Pay Any Tax. Besides, Heather’s Economic Position Would Not Change
Significantly Should The Transfer Occur. Heather Owned The Assets Before The Transfer And Still Would
Own The Assets After A Transfer To A Controlled Corporation. See Chapter 4 For A More Detailed
Discussion Of § 351.
14. (Lo 2) Yes. Once Incorporated, The Business May Be Subject To The Federal Corporate Income Tax. However,
The 21% Corporate Tax Rate Might Be Lower Than Heather’s Individual Tax Rates, Especially If Dividends
Are Not Paid To Heather.
The Corporate Income Tax Could Be Avoided Altogether By Electing To Be An S Corporation. An S
Corporation Is Generally Not Taxed At The Corporate Level; Instead, The Income Flows Through The
Corporate Veil And Is Taxed At The Shareholder Level. An S Election Allows A Business To Operate As A
Corporation But Be Taxed Like A Partnership. With A Partnership, There Is No Double Tax.
Income And Expenses Flow Through To The Partners And Are Taxed At The Partner Level.
15. (Lo 2) Examples Include Like-Kind Exchanges, Involuntary Conversions, Transfers Of Property To A
Controlled Corporation, Transfers Of Property To A Partnership, And Tax-Free Reorganization.
16. (Lo 2) Generally, A Recognized (Taxable) Gain Cannot Exceed The Realized Gain.
17. (Lo 2) Recognition Of Gain Ultimately Occurs When The Property Is Disposed Of.
18. (Lo 2) One Year.
19. (Lo 2) The Installment Method On The Sale Of Property Permits The Gain To Be
Recognized Over The Payout Period.
20. (Lo 2) Requiring Ataxpayer To Make A Contribution To A Keogh Retirement Plan By The End Of The Year
Would Force An Accurate Determination Of Net Self-Employment Income Long Before The Income Tax
Return Must Be Prepared And Filed.
21. (Lo 2) The Difference Between Common Law And Community Property Systems Centers Around The
Property Rights Possessed By Married Persons. In A Common Law System, Each Spouse Owns Whatever
He Or She Earns. Under A Community Property System, One-Half Of The Earnings Of Each Spouse Is
Considered Owned By The Other Spouse. Assume, For Example, That Harold
4
Solution Manual For South-Western Federal Taxation
2026: Comprehensive Volume 50th Edition By James
Young, Annette Nellen, Mark Persellin , Sharon
Lassar, Andrew Cuccia Newest Edition 2026
D Want to earn $1.236
extra per year?
, Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
Solution And Answer Guide
RAABE, NELLEN, YOUNG, CRIPE, LASSAR, PERSELLIN, CUCCIA, SWFT CORPORATIONS , PARTNERSHIPS, ESTATES & TRUSTS 2024,
9780357900673; CHAPTER 1: UNDERSTANDINGAND WORKING WITH THE FEDERAL TAX LAW
TABLEOFCONTENTS
Discussion Questions ................................................................................................................................ 1
Problems ...........................................................................................................................................8
Research Problems ................................................................................................................................13
Check Figures ......................................................................................................................................15
Solutiontoethics & Equity Feature................................................................................................................ 16
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. (Lo 1) When Enacting Tax Legislation, Congress Often Is Guided By The Concept Of Revenue Neutrality So That
Any Changes Neither Increase Nor Decrease The Net Revenues Raised Under The Prior Rules. Revenue
Neutrality Does Not Mean That Any One Taxpayer’s Tax Liability Remains The Same. Since This Liability
Depends On The Circumstances Involved, One Taxpayer’s Increased Tax Liability Could Be Another’s Tax
Saving. Revenue- Neutral Tax Reform Does Not Reduce Deficits, But At Least It Does Not Aggravate The
Problem.
2. (Lo 2) Economic, Social, Equity, And Political Factors Play A Significant Role In The Formulation Of Tax
Laws. Furthermore, The Treasury Department, The Irs, And The Courts Have Had Impacts On The Evolution
Of Tax Laws. For Example, Control Of The Economy Has Been An Important Economic Consideration In
Passing A Number Of Laws (E.G., Rapid Depreciation, Changes In Tax Rates). But Ultimately The Tax
Law Is Written Bycongress.
3. (Lo 2) The Tax Law Encourages Technological Progress By Allowing Immediate (Or Accelerated)
Deductions And Tax Credits For Research And Development Expenditures.
4. (Lo 2) Saving Leads To Capital Formation And Makes Funds Available To Finance Home
Construction And Industrial Expansion. For Example, The Tax Laws Provide Incentives To
Encourage Savings By Giving Private Retirement Plans Preferential Treatment.
5. (Lo 2)
a. Code § 1244 Allows Ordinary Loss Treatment On The Worthlessness Of Small Business Corporation
Stock (Discussed In Chapter 4). Since This Stock Normally Would Be A Capital Asset, The Operation
Of § 1244 Converts A Less Desirable Capital Loss Into A More Attractive Ordinary Loss. This Tax
Treatment Was Designed To Aid Small Businesses In Raising Needed Capital Through The Issuance Of
Stock.
2
, Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
b. The S Corporation Election (See Footnote 5 And A Detailed Discussion In Chapter 12) Allows The Profits
(Or Losses) Of The Corporation To Flow Through To Its Individual Shareholders (Avoiding The
Corporate Income Tax). In Addition, The Qualified Business Income Deduction May Apply To Any
Flow-Through Profits (Allowing A Maximum 20% Deduction To The Shareholders). However, With
The Corporate Tax Rate Being 21% (And Individual Marginal Tax Rates Potentially Being Higher),
Individuals Need To Compare The Benefits Of Avoiding The Corporate Tax Rate With The Taxes On
Any S Corporation Flow-Through Profits.
6. (Lo 2) Reasonable Persons Can, And Often Do, Disagree About What Is Fair Or Unfair. In The Tax Area,
Moreover, Equity Is Generally Tied To A Particular Taxpayer’s Personal Situation. For Example, One
Equity Difference Relates To How A Business Is Organized (I.E., Partnership Versus Corporation). Two
Businesses May Be Equal In Size, Similarly Situated, And Competitors In The Production Of Goods Or
Services, But They May Not Becomparably Treated Under The Tax Law If One Is A Partnership And The
Other Is A Corporation. The Corporation Is Subject To A Separate Federal Income Tax Of 21%; The
Partnership Is Not. The Tax Law Can And Does Make A Distinction Between These Business Forms. Equity,
Then, Is Not What Appears Fair Or Unfair To Any One Taxpayer Or Group Of Taxpayers. Equity Is, Instead,
What The Tax Law Recognizes.
7. (Lo 2) This Deduction Can Be Explained By Social Considerations. The Deduction Shifts Some Of The
Financial And Administrative Burden Of Socially Desirable Programs From The Public (The
Government) Sector To The Private (The Citizens) Sector.
8. (Lo 2) Preferential Treatment Of Private Retirement Plans Encourages Saving. Not Only Are
Contributions To Keogh (H.R. 10) Plans And Certain Individual Retirement Accounts (Ira) Deductible,
But Income From These Contributions Accumulates On A Tax-Free Basis.
9. (Lo 2) The Availability Of Percentage Depletion On The Extraction And Sale Of Oil And Gas And Specified
Mineral Deposits And A Write-Off (Rather Than Capitalization) Of Certain Exploration Costs Encourage
The Development Of Natural Resources.
10. (Lo 2) Favorable Treatment Of Corporate Reorganizations Provides An Economic Benefit. By Allowing
Corporations To Combine And Split Without Adverse Consequences, Corporations Are In A Position To
Reduce Their Taxes And Possibly More Effectively Compete With Other Businesses (Both Nationally
And Internationally).
11. (Lo 2) Although The Major Objective Of The Federal Tax Law Is The Raising Of Revenue, Other
Considerations Explain Many Provisions. In Particular, Economic, Social, Equity, And Political Factors
Play A Significant Role. Added To These Factors Is The Impact The Treasury Department, The Internal
Revenue Service, And The Courts Have Had And Will Continue To Have On The Evolution Of Federal
Tax Law.
12. (Lo 2) The Deduction Allowed For Federal Income Tax Purposes For State And Local Income Taxes Is
Not Designed To Neutralize The Effect Of Multiple Taxation On The Same Income. At Most, This
Deduction Provides Only Partial Relief. The $10,000 Overall Limitation On State And Local Taxes Also
Reduces The Tax Benefit Of These Taxes. Only Allowing A Full Tax Credit Would Achieve Complete
Neutrality.
3
, Stuvia.com - The Marketplace to Buy and Sell your Study Material
a. With The Standard Deduction, A Taxpayer Is Indirectly Obtaining The Benefit Of A Deduction For
Any State Or Local Income Taxes He Or She May Have Paid. The Standard Deduction Is In Lieu Of
Itemized Deductions, Which Include Any Allowed Deductions For State And Local Income
Taxes.
b. If The Taxpayer Is In The 10% Tax Bracket, $1 Of A Deduction For State Or Local Taxes Would Save
$0.10 Of Federal Income Tax Liability. In The 32% Tax Bracket, The Saving Becomes $0.32. The Deduction
Approach (As Opposed To The Allowance Of A Credit) Favors High-Bracket Taxpayers.
13. (Lo 2) Under The General Rule, A Transfer Of A Partnership’s Assets To A New Corporation Could Result
In A Taxable Gain. However, If Certain Conditions Are Met, § 351 Postpones The Recognition Of Any Gain
(Or Loss) On The Transfer Of Property By Heather To A Controlled Corporation (See Example 4).
The Wherewithal To Pay Concept Recognizes The Inequity Of Taxing A Transaction When Heather Lacks
The Means With Which To Pay Any Tax. Besides, Heather’s Economic Position Would Not Change
Significantly Should The Transfer Occur. Heather Owned The Assets Before The Transfer And Still Would
Own The Assets After A Transfer To A Controlled Corporation. See Chapter 4 For A More Detailed
Discussion Of § 351.
14. (Lo 2) Yes. Once Incorporated, The Business May Be Subject To The Federal Corporate Income Tax. However,
The 21% Corporate Tax Rate Might Be Lower Than Heather’s Individual Tax Rates, Especially If Dividends
Are Not Paid To Heather.
The Corporate Income Tax Could Be Avoided Altogether By Electing To Be An S Corporation. An S
Corporation Is Generally Not Taxed At The Corporate Level; Instead, The Income Flows Through The
Corporate Veil And Is Taxed At The Shareholder Level. An S Election Allows A Business To Operate As A
Corporation But Be Taxed Like A Partnership. With A Partnership, There Is No Double Tax.
Income And Expenses Flow Through To The Partners And Are Taxed At The Partner Level.
15. (Lo 2) Examples Include Like-Kind Exchanges, Involuntary Conversions, Transfers Of Property To A
Controlled Corporation, Transfers Of Property To A Partnership, And Tax-Free Reorganization.
16. (Lo 2) Generally, A Recognized (Taxable) Gain Cannot Exceed The Realized Gain.
17. (Lo 2) Recognition Of Gain Ultimately Occurs When The Property Is Disposed Of.
18. (Lo 2) One Year.
19. (Lo 2) The Installment Method On The Sale Of Property Permits The Gain To Be
Recognized Over The Payout Period.
20. (Lo 2) Requiring Ataxpayer To Make A Contribution To A Keogh Retirement Plan By The End Of The Year
Would Force An Accurate Determination Of Net Self-Employment Income Long Before The Income Tax
Return Must Be Prepared And Filed.
21. (Lo 2) The Difference Between Common Law And Community Property Systems Centers Around The
Property Rights Possessed By Married Persons. In A Common Law System, Each Spouse Owns Whatever
He Or She Earns. Under A Community Property System, One-Half Of The Earnings Of Each Spouse Is
Considered Owned By The Other Spouse. Assume, For Example, That Harold
4
