Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 17 pages
Exam (elaborations)

D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and Evidence Questions and Correct Answers

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 17 pages

D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and Evidence Questions and Correct Answers

Content preview

D265 - WGU - Critical Thinking - Reason and
Evidence Questions and Correct Answers
PROPOSITIONS

Are statements that can be true or false

NON-PROPOSITONS

Are sentences that are not statements about matters of fact or fiction. They do not make a

claim that can be true or false.

SIMPLE PROPOSITIONS

Have no internal logic structure, meaning whether they are true or false does not depend on

whether a part of them is true or false. They are simply true or false on their own. (Example:

Harry Potter wears glasses. The sky is blue.)

COMPLEX PROPOSITIONS

Have internal logic structure, meaning they are composed of simple propositions. Whether

they are true or false depends on whether their parts are true or false. (Example: The sky is

blue, but it does not look blue to me right now. The cat ate the food, but he did not like it. The

GDP of Canada is either $3 trillion or $12 trillion.)

Words used to identify Independent Propositions

AND, OR, EITHER, BUT, IF, THEN.

CONCLUSION INDICATORS

THEREFORE, SO, IT FOLLOWS THAT, HENCE, THUS, ENTAILS THAT, WE MAY

CONCLUDE THAT, IMPLIES THAT, WHEREFORE, AND AS A RESULT.

,PREMISE INDICATORS

BECAUSE, FOR, GIVEN THAT, AS, SINCE, AS INDICATED BY.

DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Arguments where the premises guarantee or necessitate the conclusion.

-mathematical arguments, logical arguments, arguments from definition.

INDUCTION ARGUMENTS

Arguments where the premises make the conclusion probable.

-analogies, authority, causal inferences, extrapolations, etc.

INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION OR ABDUCTION

Arguments where the best available explanation is chosen as the correct explanation.

FORMAL FALLACY

Concerns the structure of an argument

INFORMAL FALLACY

Concerns the informational content of an argument

A FORMAL FALLACY IS A TYPE OF

Bad Argument Structure

Which piece of information would be the most helpful to know in assessing the

credibility of a news story?

Whether the name of the author and the publication are identified

Which questions are most appropriate for evaluating the credibility of an information

source?

, Who funded it? & Does it try to get you to distrust other sources?

While researching a topic on the internet, a student encounters two different websites,

one of that looks more official than the other and includes tables, charts, and statistics,

while the other does not.

What is the line of reasoning this student should employ to determine which site is more

credible?

It is not feasible to determine which site is more credible from the information provided.

In which way should an information source be approached if it is stating that it is the

only source of real information and that other sources cannot be trusted?

Skeptically, because the source may lack credibility.

PRINCIPLE OF CHARITY

The principle of charity suggests we should try to understand ideas before criticizing them.

Which of the following are reasons for applying the principle of charity?

It is morally right to give others the benefit of the doubt.

It allows for a clearer understanding of the issue.

Smith is committed to the belief that technological advancement is always beneficial and

thus never detrimental to human life. Smith reads a carefully written and sufficiently

argued essay in which the author contends that the human adoption of any new

technology involves both advantages and disadvantages to its adopters. Since Smith is a

loyal technophile, Smith accepts the author's claims about the advantages of technology

but rejects the author's claims about the disadvantages of technology.

Which cognitive bias is Smith demonstrating?

Document information

Uploaded on
July 9, 2026
Number of pages
17
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$13.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
KenAli
2.6
(18)
Sold
100
Followers
5
Items
20651
Last sold
4 days ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions