Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

CITI Program Comprehensive Examination Research Ethics & Compliance (Latest 2026/2027 Update) | Complete Q&A with Verified Answers and Detailed Rationales | A+ Graded

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
47
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
04-07-2026
Written in
2025/2026

INSTANT PDF DOWNLOAD - This is the comprehensive study guide for the CITI Program Comprehensive Examination on Research Ethics & Compliance (Latest 2026/2027 Update), featuring verified exam questions with correct answers and detailed rationales. Covers the Belmont Report principles (respect for persons, beneficence, justice), IRB regulations and review processes (exempt, expedited, full board), informed consent requirements and waivers, vulnerable populations (children, prisoners, pregnant women), HIPAA privacy and security rules, Conflicts of Interest (COI), and Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR). Key Exam Questions & Answers Belmont Report & Core Ethical Principles Belmont Report Principle of Beneficence: Maximization of benefits and minimization of risks . Belmont Report Respect for Persons: Requires that subjects freely choose to participate in research (voluntariness) and are adequately informed about a study (informed consent) . Belmont Report Principle of Justice: Research benefit and burden distribution and fair selection of subjects . Tuskegee Study: Links most directly to the establishment of the National Research Act in 1974 and ultimately the Belmont Report and Federal regulations for human subject protection . Informed Consent & IRB Review Informed Consent Elements: Must include all foreseeable risks and discomforts . Exempt Research: Research is eligible for exemption if it falls into one of eight categories of research activity described in the regulations . Expedited Review: May be used when study procedures pose no more than minimal risk and the research activities fall within regulatory categories identified as eligible . IRB Primary Responsibility: Protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects; assuring all applicable institutional policies and federal regulations are followed; reviewing subject recruitment materials and strategies . Waiver of Documentation of Informed Consent: May be granted when the only record linking the subject and the research is the consent document and the principal risk is a breach of confidentiality

Show more Read less

Content preview

MAXE · EVISNEHERPMOC
CITI★
★ CITI Program
PROGRAM Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative
EST. 2000
A D V A N C I N G R E S E A R C H E T H I C S & C O M P L I A N C E E D U C AT I O N




CITI Program — Comprehensive Examination
D U R C · B I O S A F E TY · B LO O D B O R N E PAT H O G E N S · N A N OT E C H N O LO G Y · R C R

INSTITUTION CITI Program MODULES DURC · IBC · OSHA BBP · Nano ·
RCR
SUBJECT Research Ethics & Laboratory ACADEMIC YEAR
Safety
ASSESSMENT Comprehensive Training TOTAL QUESTIONS 95 Questions
Examination
REGULATIONS NIH · OSHA · PHS · FDA · NSF FORMAT Multiple Choice — Select the
Single Best Answer


EXAMINATION INSTRUCTIONS
▸ Select the single best answer for each question.
▸ Covers DURC, IRE/IBC responsibilities, biosafety levels, bloodborne pathogens, nanotechnology safety,
responsible conduct of research, and authorship.
▸ Correct answers and detailed rationales appear below each question.

, CITI COMPREHENSIVE — DURC · BIOSAFETY · BBP · NANO
Questions 1 – 95
· RCR

1. If the PI does not agree with the IRE findings, they can request:
A. Immediate termination of the research project
B. Review by the USG (United States Government)
C. A new IRE to be appointed
D. Self-regulation without oversight
CORRECT ANSWER B — Review by the USG (United States Government)
RATIONALE When a PI disagrees with the Institutional Review Entity (IRE) findings regarding
DURC (Dual Use Research of Concern), they may request review by the United
States Government funding agency for a final determination.


2. Which of the following is a responsibility of the IRE?
A. Conducting the laboratory experiments
B. Notification within 30 days of organizational review to the USG funding agency
C. Publishing research findings
D. Training laboratory personnel
CORRECT ANSWER B — Notification within 30 days of organizational review to the USG funding
agency
RATIONALE The IRE must notify the USG funding agency within 30 days of completing its
organizational review of potential DURC. This ensures timely federal oversight of
dual-use research concerns.

,3. For research to qualify as potential DURC, the PI and IRE must perform an initial
assessment on which of the following?
A. The researcher's financial conflicts of interest only
B. Use of a listed agent or toxin that may result in one or more of the seven experiments of
concern
C. The laboratory's physical security measures only
D. The publication record of the research team
CORRECT ANSWER B — Use of a listed agent or toxin that may result in one or more of the
seven experiments of concern
RATIONALE DURC assessment evaluates whether research involves one of 15 listed
agents/toxins AND may produce, as a result, one or more of the seven categories
of experiments of concern (e.g., enhancing virulence, disrupting immunity, etc.).


4. What organizations are required to have an IRE if DURC is being considered?
A. Only private research institutions
B. Any organization that receives money from the federal government
C. Only universities with medical schools
D. Only pharmaceutical companies
CORRECT ANSWER B — Any organization that receives money from the federal government
RATIONALE The USG DURC policy applies to all institutions and organizations that receive
federal funding for life sciences research. These entities must establish an IRE to
review potential DURC.

, 5. How often is IRE review required to determine if research still falls under DURC or
enhanced measures are required?
A. Only at the beginning of the project
B. At least annually
C. Every 5 years
D. Only when requested by the PI
CORRECT ANSWER B — At least annually
RATIONALE DURC determinations require ongoing review. The IRE must review the research
at least annually to determine whether it still falls under DURC and whether
enhanced risk mitigation measures continue to be appropriate.


6. Which is accurate regarding NIOSH exposure limits for nanomaterials?
A. NIOSH has no recommendations for nanomaterials
B. NIOSH provides recommended occupational exposure limits for carbon nanotubes,
carbon nanofibres, silver nanoparticles, and titanium dioxide
C. NIOSH only regulates nanomaterials in food products
D. NIOSH exposure limits are identical for all nanomaterials
CORRECT ANSWER B — NIOSH provides recommended occupational exposure limits for
carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibres, silver nanoparticles, and titanium
dioxide
RATIONALE NIOSH has established Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) for specific
nanomaterials including carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, silver
nanoparticles, and titanium dioxide, recognizing their unique occupational health
risks.

Document information

Uploaded on
July 4, 2026
Number of pages
47
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

$12.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
DoctorKen Chamberlain College Of Nursing
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
788
Member since
2 year
Number of followers
115
Documents
6454
Last sold
5 hours ago
All Solutions

=== PASS THE FIRST TIME! === I provide professionally organized, exam-focused study materials designed to help students master key concepts, study more efficiently, and approach assessments with confidence. Each resource is carefully structured to align with course objectives and exam expectations, transforming complex topics into clear, understandable content that is easier to learn and retain. #Study guides #Exam preparation #Test materials #Study documents #Exam resources #Test study aids #Study notes #Exam study guides #Study materials #Exam papers

Read more Read less
3.8

141 reviews

5
68
4
23
3
27
2
6
1
17

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions