JURISPRUDENCE EXAM PREP DOCUMENT | 2025/2026
EDITION | 250 VERIFIED QUESTIONS
TENNESSEE PSYCHOLOGY ETHICS & JURISPRUDENCE EXAM 2025-2026 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
ALREADY GRADED A+. 100% Verified Solutions | Updated Per Latest Tennessee Board of Examiners Guidelines |
Graded A+
This comprehensive exam preparation document contains 250 verified questions covering the
Tennessee Psychology Ethics and Jurisprudence Exam. Each question includes a correct answer and a
detailed rationale explaining the underlying ethical principle or legal statute. The content is aligned
with the latest Tennessee Board of Examiners in Psychology guidelines and the APA Ethical Principles
of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Ideal for candidates seeking licensure or renewal in Tennessee.
Key Features:
Tennessee-specific laws and rules governing psychological practice
APA Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct
Confidentiality, informed consent, and mandatory reporting
Professional boundaries, competence, and supervision
Assessment, testing, and record keeping
Advertising, fees, and business practices
Updates for 2026:
- Updated to reflect 2025-2026 Tennessee Board of Examiners rule changes
- Incorporated recent Tennessee legislative amendments affecting telehealth and remote practice
- Revised rationales to include latest APA ethics code interpretations
- Added new questions on diversity and cultural competence in ethical decision-making
- Enhanced distractor explanations to clarify common misconceptions
Abstract:
This document serves as a definitive study resource for the Tennessee Psychology Ethics and Jurisprudence
Examination, a mandatory licensure requirement for psychologists practicing in Tennessee. The 250 questions are
meticulously crafted to assess knowledge of the Tennessee Psychological Practice Act, Board rules, and the APA
Ethics Code. Each question is accompanied by a comprehensive rationale that not only identifies the correct
answer but also explains why other options are incorrect, reinforcing key concepts. The content is organized by
major content areas, including confidentiality, informed consent, mandatory reporting, professional competence,
and ethical decision-making frameworks. Special attention is given to Tennessee-specific statutes, such as those
governing telehealth, child abuse reporting, and dual relationships. This resource is updated for the 2025-2026
testing cycle, ensuring alignment with the most current legal and ethical standards. Candidates will benefit from
the detailed explanations that promote deep understanding rather than rote memorization. The document is
designed to simulate the exam experience, with questions ranging in difficulty and format, including
scenario-based items. By mastering this material, candidates will be well-prepared to demonstrate their
commitment to ethical practice and legal compliance in Tennessee.
Keywords:
Tennessee psychology ethics, jurisprudence exam, APA ethics code, Tennessee Board of Examiners, informed
consent, mandatory reporting, confidentiality, professional boundaries
Answer Format:
Each question is followed by the correct answer and a comprehensive rationale that explains the ethical or legal
Page 1
,basis for the answer. Rationales also address common distractors, clarifying why other options are incorrect. This
format helps candidates understand the reasoning behind each correct choice and avoid common pitfalls.
Compliance Checklist:
All questions align with Tennessee Psychological Practice Act and Board rules
Rationales reference specific APA Ethics Code standards and Tennessee statutes
Content updated to reflect 2025-2026 regulatory changes
Questions reviewed by subject matter experts for accuracy
Includes scenario-based questions to test application of ethics
Distractor explanations provided for enhanced learning
Content Area Overview:
Content Area Questions Key Topics Weight
Confidentiality and Privacy 1-50 limits of confidentiality, HIPAA, Tennessee 20%
privacy laws, exceptions, mandatory
reporting
Informed Consent 51-90 elements of consent, capacity, minors, 16%
telehealth consent, documentation
Professional Competence and 91-130 competence boundaries, supervision 16%
Supervision requirements, continuing education,
impairment
Ethical Decision Making and 131-170 dual relationships, conflicts of interest, 16%
Boundaries multiple relationships, ethical
problem-solving
Assessment, Testing, and Record 171-210 test selection, informed consent for testing, 16%
Keeping record retention, release of records
Advertising, Fees, and Business 211-250 truthful advertising, fee arrangements, 16%
Practices bartering, third-party payments, termination
Page 2
,Q1. A psychologist in Tennessee receives a subpoena duces tecum for a client's therapy records in a
child custody dispute. The client initially signed a broad release for 'all records,' but later revokes
the release in writing. The psychologist has not yet been ordered by a judge to produce the records.
Which of the following is the most ethically and legally appropriate initial action?
A. Comply with the subpoena because the client initially consented, and the revocation is untimely.
B. Refuse to produce any records until a court order is issued, citing the client's revocation and the
psychologist's duty to protect confidentiality.
C. Produce only the records that are directly relevant to the custody evaluation, as determined by the
psychologist.
D. File a motion to quash the subpoena or seek a protective order, while notifying the client and
consulting with legal counsel.
Correct Answer: D. File a motion to quash the subpoena or seek a protective order, while notifying
the client and consulting with legal counsel.
Rationale: When a client revokes consent, a subpoena alone does not override confidentiality. The
psychologist must assert privilege on behalf of the client and seek judicial intervention (e.g., motion to
quash) before disclosing. Options A and C violate confidentiality without legal mandate. Option B is too
passive; the psychologist should proactively protect the client's rights by seeking a court order.
Why Wrong:
A - The revocation of consent is valid, and a subpoena without a court order does not compel
disclosure; initial consent is not irrevocable.
B - While refusal is correct, the psychologist has an affirmative duty to protect confidentiality by
seeking a court order, not merely waiting.
C - The psychologist cannot unilaterally determine relevance; this would violate confidentiality and
exceed professional authority.
Reference: APA Ethics Code (2017), Standard 4.05; Tennessee Rule 0450-01-.12; HIPAA Privacy Rule 45
CFR §164.512(e)
Q2. A licensed psychologist is considering a bartering arrangement with a client who owns a
construction business. The client has offered to remodel the psychologist's office in exchange for
therapy sessions. The psychologist's office is in a rural area where mental health services are scarce,
and the client has expressed financial hardship. Which of the following considerations is MOST
critical in determining whether this bartering arrangement is ethically permissible under the APA
Ethics Code?
A. The relative monetary value of the services being exchanged must be approximately equal.
B. The client must be informed in writing that bartering is not covered by insurance and that they can
terminate the arrangement at any time.
C. The psychologist must ensure that the arrangement is not exploitative and is culturally appropriate,
particularly given the rural context.
D. The psychologist must obtain a written agreement signed by both parties specifying the terms of
the barter.
Correct Answer: C. The psychologist must ensure that the arrangement is not exploitative and is
culturally appropriate, particularly given the rural context.
Rationale: APA Ethics Code Standard 6.05 prohibits bartering if it is exploitative or clinically
inappropriate. The rural context and client's financial hardship raise concerns about power imbalance
and potential exploitation. While value equivalence (A) and documentation (D) are relevant, the core
ethical issue is whether the arrangement is exploitative. Option B is not a standard requirement.
Page 3
, Why Wrong:
A - Monetary equivalence is not the primary ethical consideration; the focus is on exploitation and
clinical appropriateness.
B - There is no specific requirement to inform about insurance coverage in bartering; this is not a
standard ethical obligation.
D - While a written agreement is prudent, it is not the most critical factor; even with documentation,
the arrangement may be exploitative.
Reference: APA Ethics Code (2017), Standard 6.05; Tennessee Rule 0450-01-.13(3)
Page 4