Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 30 pages
Exam (elaborations)

CEPA Certified Exit Planning Advisor Exam Questions with 100% Correct Answers | 100% Correct Answers with Detailed Rationales (2026/2027 Edition)

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 30 pages

Prepare for the CEPA Certified Exit Planning Advisor Exam with this comprehensive prep resource featuring questions with 100% correct answers. These practice questions are designed to support your revision with detailed rationales that explain key concepts in exit planning and succession advisory. Strengthen your knowledge and approach the certification assessment with confidence.

Content preview

CEPA Certified Exit Planning Advisor Exam Questions with 100%
Correct Answers | 100% Correct Answers with Detailed Rationales
(2026/2027 Edition)



SECTION 1: Business Valuation and Financial Analysis

Question 1
Which of the following best describes the primary conceptual distinction between the
income approach and the market approach to business valuation?
A. The income approach relies on comparable transactions, while the market approach
uses discounted cash flows.
B. The income approach estimates value based on future economic benefits, while the
market approach derives value from comparable company data.
C. The income approach uses only historical financial data, while the market approach
requires five-year projections.
D. The income approach is exclusively used for distressed companies, while the market
approach applies only to healthy businesses.

Correct Answer: B
Rationale: The income approach determines value by converting anticipated future
economic benefits (cash flows or earnings) into a present value through discounting or
capitalization, reflecting the investment principle that value equals the present worth of
future returns. The market approach determines value by comparing the subject
company to similar businesses or transactions in the marketplace, applying valuation
multiples derived from those comparables. Option A reverses the methodologies.
Option C is incorrect because the income approach requires projections, not historical
data, and the market approach does not require projections. Option D is incorrect
because both approaches are applicable across a wide spectrum of company health
and distress.

,Question 2
A valuation analyst is preparing a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis for a mid-market
manufacturing company. The following projections have been provided:

●​ Free Cash Flow 2026: $2.5M
●​ Free Cash Flow 2027: $2.9M
●​ Free Cash Flow 2028: $3.3M
●​ Free Cash Flow 2029: $3.6M
●​ Terminal growth rate: 3.0%


WACC: 10.0%
Assuming a mid-year convention is not applied, what is the estimated enterprise value?
A. $38.2M
B. $42.5M
C. $45.8M
●​ D. $51.3M

Correct Answer: C
Rationale: The terminal value at the end of 2029 is calculated using the Gordon Growth
Model: $3.6M × 1.03 / (0.10 − 0.03) = $52.97M. The present value of each cash flow
and the terminal value is: PV(2026) = $2.27M; PV(2027) = $2.40M; PV(2028) = $2.48M;
PV(2029) = $2.46M; PV(Terminal Value) = $36.18M. Summing these components yields
$45.79M, or approximately $45.8M. Option A incorrectly applies a capitalization rate
without discounting. Option B uses an incorrect terminal value formula. Option D fails to
discount the terminal value properly.

Question 3
When normalizing EBITDA for a closely held business in preparation for a market-based
valuation, which of the following adjustments is most appropriate?
A. Adding back all officer compensation to reflect market-rate replacement cost
B. Eliminating depreciation expense because it is a non-cash charge
C. Adjusting related-party rent to fair market value and removing non-recurring legal
expenses
D. Removing all interest expense because debt will be paid off at closing

Correct Answer: C

, Rationale: Normalization adjustments are intended to present financial results as if the
business were operated on a sustainable, arm's-length basis. Adjusting related-party
rent to fair market value removes economic distortions from self-dealing, and removing
non-recurring expenses prevents one-time events from distorting run-rate profitability.
Option A is incorrect because only excess above-market compensation should be
added back, not all officer compensation. Option B is incorrect because EBITDA already
adds back depreciation; eliminating it entirely would be double-counting. Option D is
incorrect because interest is already added back in EBITDA, and the assumption about
debt payoff may not be accurate.

Question 4
A private company reports $12.5M in revenue and $2.8M in EBITDA. Comparable
transactions in the industry suggest a 5.5x EBITDA multiple. The company carries
$4.2M in debt and holds $1.1M in cash. What is the estimated equity value?
A. $10.1M
B. $12.3M
C. $14.6M
D. $16.8M

Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Enterprise Value (EV) = EBITDA × Multiple = $2.8M × 5.5 = $15.4M. Equity
Value = EV − Debt + Cash = $15.4M − $4.2M + $1.1M = $12.3M. Option A incorrectly
subtracts cash instead of adding it. Option C fails to adjust for debt and cash. Option D
incorrectly adds debt instead of subtracting it.

Question 5
When analyzing a company's balance sheet as part of an exit readiness assessment,
which financial metric would most directly indicate potential working capital
deficiencies that could reduce transaction value?
A. Debt-to-equity ratio
B. Days sales outstanding (DSO)
C. Return on assets
D. Fixed asset turnover

Document information

Uploaded on
June 27, 2026
Number of pages
30
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$17.00

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PrimeScholars
3.1
(11)
Sold
71
Followers
0
Items
3034
Last sold
5 hours ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions