Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Psychology of Social Media

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
34
Uploaded on
03-06-2021
Written in
2020/2021

I scored a 17/20, summary of all the lectures and slides

Institution
Course

Content preview

PSYCHOLOGICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF SOCIAL MEDIA AND SOCIAL NETWORKS

SOICAL MEDIA

= online media that allows its users to produce, collaborate on and share content with other users.
< social networking sites, instant messaging applications, blogs, video sharing communities...
 general internet use, online gaming

→ the younger, the more people active on social networking sites (SNS), but number continues to
rise (more adults on SNS)

→ adults: YT & FB
→ 18 – 24yo: Insta & Snapchat


MULTIPLE FORMS OF COMMUNICATION

- Public vs private
- One-to-one vs one-to-many
- Synchronous vs asynchronous
- Temporarily vs permanent
- Textual vs media-based


MASS COMMUNICATION RESEARCH AT THE CROSSROADS

Blumer (1946): little interaction or exchange of experiences between the members of the mass

 today: individuals can reach large audiences that are anonymous, and interact with each other via
SNS

Interpersonal Communication:
Transfer of a message from one person to the other = exchange of message since feedback is
immediate

Similarities between mass and interpersonal communication:
Both forms of communication with sender, receiver and medium, chance of feedback in both cases,
absence of feedback → failure of communication process

Differences:
In mass communication the sender and receiver are unknown to each other, furthermore even if
anyone or two amongst the larger audience fails to understand the message, the communication
stays uninterrupted (in mass communication)(ex: tv will continue), but when interpersonal: sender
and receiver know each other, if either sender or receiver fails to understand the message, this leads
to a failure of communication and communication will stop.

,Social media
Which can include communication with larger audiences, which doesn’t always stay anonymous and
includes interaction feedback, seems in the middle of the two

Masspersonal communication emerges from observations of instances where:

- Individuals use conventional mass communication channels for interpersonal communication
- Individuals use conventional interpersonal communication channels for mass communication
- Individuals use interpersonal and mass comm simultaneously (trying to communicate
something to a loved one and a wider audience at the same time)

→ Senders become receivers and vice versa & roles change frequently, even in 1 day


WHAT DRIVES US TO SOCIAL MEDIA?


USES & GRATIFICATIONS APPROACH TO SOCIAL MEDIA

1. Social interaction
2. Information seeking
3. Pass time
4. Entertainment
5. Relaxation
6. Expression of opinions
7. Communicatory utility (gossip)
8. Convenience utility (accessibility)
9. Information sharing
10. Surveillance/knowledge about others

BIOPSYCHOLOGICAL APPRAOCH TO SOCIAL MEDIA

The desire to communicate is a primary human instinct → relationship with technology has
neurological foundations.

Dopamine = feel-good neurotransmitter

Social interaction activates the dopaminergic reward circuits in the subcortical brain (= same for
addictive drug use, compulsive video gaming, and reward-seeking in general). With social media,
nearly all notifications that the user encounters elicit a social value and thus activate the
dopaminergic reward circuit, leading the user to anticipate and seek rewarding notifications.
→ Thanks to dopamine, we want and seek rewarding notifications from technology/social media →
addiction

Anticipation = important factor for dopamine activity

→ Even when we’re not on social media, our brain is → hypermonitoring of incoming stimuli (=
phantom vibration)

,DUNBAR’S NUMBER

 150 stable interpersonal relationships: ratio between brain size and group size

→ well-defined limits to the number of friends a person can retain and little differences between
intro- and extraverted person.

→ limited by the neocortical processing capacity

→ Cognitive/biological limit to the number of relationships that can be simultaneously maintained by
a single individual (supported on social media).

, CYBERBULLYING

The prevalence of cyberbullying varies over different countries → research literature does not define
cyberbullying in a clear way → definitions are tricky: grey zone which can explain the big gaps in
prevalence rates between countries

DEFINITIONAL FEATURES OF BULLYING

- Repetition
- Deliberate intent to harm
- Power imbalance
o Technological skills
o Anonymity
o Mass audience in one click

→ An aggressive, intentional act carried out by a group or individual, using electronic forms of
contact, repeatedly and over time against a victim who cannot easily defend himself.

Adolescents were asked to give their own definition of cyberbullying

- Power imbalance: not mentioned at all
- Repetition: only mentioned a couple of times
- Intent (both deliberate and non-deliberate) was most referred to criteria
- (negative) impact: almost everyone mentioned it

Then, they were asked what experiences they had




→ experience feels more profound when friends don’t stand up for you

WHERE AND HOW

- Flaming: sending or posting hostile, angry or mischievous messages intended to inflame the
emotions and sensibilities of others (directed to the subject of discussion)

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
June 3, 2021
Number of pages
34
Written in
2020/2021
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$8.22
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
celineisebaert Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
22
Member since
6 year
Number of followers
15
Documents
7
Last sold
2 year ago

2.0

2 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions