Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 11 pages
Summary

Auditing 771 Topic 1-5 Summary

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 11 pages

This summary document is a comprehensive, exam-focussed guide for PGDA students to help them for their Auditing exam, specifically the 2026 curriculum. It combines theoretical frameworks with practical application, drawing from a variety of academic and professional sources including the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008, the King V Report on Corporate Governance, and International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Topic 1 - Audit Process Topic 2 - Companies Act & King V Topic 3 - Controls Topic 4 - Pre-engagement, Materiality, Audit Approach/Response Topic 5 - Test of Controls, Substantive Procedures

Content preview

Topic 1

1. The Nature and Objective of an Audit

The primary objective of an external audit is to obtain reasonable assurance that financial
statements (AFS) are free from material misstatement. This enables the auditor to express an
opinion on whether the AFS fairly present the entity's financial position in accordance with a
specific reporting framework.

• Levels of Assurance: An audit provides a high, but not absolute, level of "reasonable
assurance," whereas an independent review provides "limited assurance". "Related
services," such as compilations or agreed-upon procedures, provide no assurance.

• Inherent Limitations: Audits cannot provide absolute assurance due to the nature of
financial reporting (which involves judgement), the nature of audit procedures (which
involve sampling), and time and cost constraints.

2. Statutory Requirements: Audit vs. Independent Review

Under the Companies Act and Regulations, entities must determine if their AFS require a
compulsory audit or an independent review.

Compulsory Audit Triggers:

• Public and State-Owned Companies: Always required to be audited.

• Fiduciary Capacity: Any company holding assets in a fiduciary capacity for people not
related to the company, exceeding R5 million at any time during the year.

• Public Interest (PI) Score:

o Any entity with a PI score of 350 or more.

o Any entity with a PI score between 100 and 349 if its AFS were internally
compiled.

• MOI Requirements: If the company’s Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI) specifically
requires an audit.

Independent Review and Exemptions:

• Entities with a PI score between 100 and 349 whose AFS are independently compiled
by an independent accounting professional require a review rather than an audit.

• Owner-Managed Businesses: Private companies where every shareholder is also a
director are generally exempt from both audit and review requirements, provided they do
not meet the other compulsory audit criteria (like the R5 million fiduciary asset
threshold or a high PI score).



3. Public Interest (PI) Score and Reporting Standards

The PI Score must be calculated at the end of every financial year. It is the sum of:

, • The number of points equal to the average number of employees.

• One point for every R1 million (or portion thereof) in turnover.

• One point for every R1 million (or portion thereof) in third-party liabilities.

• One point for every individual who has a beneficial interest (shareholders/members).

Financial Reporting Standards: Regulations specify which standards (e.g., IFRS or IFRS for
SMEs) must be used based on the company's category, PI score, and whether the statements
were compiled independently. Notably, SA GAAP is no longer a recognized standard.

4. Quality Management Standards (ISQM1 & ISA 220)

Quality management is essential to ensure firms comply with professional standards and legal
requirements.

• Firm Level (ISQM1): The audit firm is responsible for establishing and documenting a
system of quality management. The ultimate responsibility for this system rests with the
firm's CEO or managing board, not just individual partners.

• Engagement Level (ISA 220): The engagement partner is responsible for the overall
quality of each specific audit engagement. This includes proper direction, supervision,
and a thorough review of audit working papers before signing the audit report.

• Common Non-Compliance Issues:

o Failure to appoint an engagement quality reviewer for listed entity audits.

o Assigning staff based solely on availability rather than competence and
capability.

o Accepting new clients without first evaluating independence, ethical
requirements, or the integrity of the client's management.

o Failing to document quality management procedures within the audit working
papers.

5. Requirements for the Auditor

• Independent Accounting Professional: To be classified as such, an individual must be
a registered auditor, a member in good standing of an accredited professional body (like
SAICA), or a qualified CC accounting officer. They must have no personal financial
interest in the company and cannot have been involved in its day-to-day management
for the previous three years.

• Rotation: For listed companies, the lead engagement partner must rotate every five
years.

• Professional Oversight: The Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA)
performs practice reviews to monitor compliance with standards. Registered auditors
must also perform mandatory Continued Professional Development (CPD).

Document information

Uploaded on
May 24, 2026
Number of pages
11
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Summary
$7.60

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
chrizneybutler
4.0
(3)
Sold
11
Followers
0
Items
8
Last sold
3 months ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions