LLB EXAMPACKS AND TUTORIALS
(WhatsApp Business): 084 591 8661
(F): 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
__________________________________________________________________________________
LLB EXAM PACKS AND TUTORIALS
➢ Past paper solutions,
➢ notes,
➢ summaries,
➢ assignment packs &
➢ tuitions
PVL3703
LAW OF DELICT
UNISA
2021
ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 2
DUE DATE:11 JUNE 2021
UNIQUE NUMBER: 787907
, 1. Which is the odd one out?
1. Liability for pure economic loss.
2. The actio de pauperie.
3. The actio de pastu.
4. Vicarious liability.
2. Which one of the following cases was a trend-setting judgment on necessity,
although aspects of the judgment may need to be revisited in the current constitutional
dispensation?
1. Kruger v Coetzee 1966 2 SA 428 (A).
2. First National Bank of South Africa Ltd v Duvenhage 2006 5 SA 319 (SCA).
3. S v Goliath 1972 3 SA 1 (A).
4. Van Eeden v Minister of Safety and Security (Women’s Legal Centre Trust, as
amicus curiae) 2003 1 SA 389 (SCA).
3. The most suitable remedy for the prevention of harm is...
1. The actio legis Aquiliae.
2. Mitigation of loss.
3. The actio de effusis vel deiectis.
4. The interdict.
4. If a court must determine whether a brain surgeon was negligent while performing
brain surgery on a patient, the court will inquire whether he met the standard of care
of:
1. The reasonable person.
2. The reasonable brain surgeon.
(WhatsApp Business): 084 591 8661
(F): 086 096 5452 www.llbexampacksandtutorials.co.za
__________________________________________________________________________________
LLB EXAM PACKS AND TUTORIALS
➢ Past paper solutions,
➢ notes,
➢ summaries,
➢ assignment packs &
➢ tuitions
PVL3703
LAW OF DELICT
UNISA
2021
ASSIGNMENT NUMBER 2
DUE DATE:11 JUNE 2021
UNIQUE NUMBER: 787907
, 1. Which is the odd one out?
1. Liability for pure economic loss.
2. The actio de pauperie.
3. The actio de pastu.
4. Vicarious liability.
2. Which one of the following cases was a trend-setting judgment on necessity,
although aspects of the judgment may need to be revisited in the current constitutional
dispensation?
1. Kruger v Coetzee 1966 2 SA 428 (A).
2. First National Bank of South Africa Ltd v Duvenhage 2006 5 SA 319 (SCA).
3. S v Goliath 1972 3 SA 1 (A).
4. Van Eeden v Minister of Safety and Security (Women’s Legal Centre Trust, as
amicus curiae) 2003 1 SA 389 (SCA).
3. The most suitable remedy for the prevention of harm is...
1. The actio legis Aquiliae.
2. Mitigation of loss.
3. The actio de effusis vel deiectis.
4. The interdict.
4. If a court must determine whether a brain surgeon was negligent while performing
brain surgery on a patient, the court will inquire whether he met the standard of care
of:
1. The reasonable person.
2. The reasonable brain surgeon.
