Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Revision for Component 3 Politics

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
10
Uploaded on
09-05-2026
Written in
2025/2026

Revision Notes for A-level Edexcel Politics Component 3, comparative paper 3. Notes included cover all areas of: Supreme Court and Civil Rights, Constitution and Federalism, Congress, Presidency, Presidential and Congressional Elections, Checks and Balances, and Democracy and Participation. ++ BONUS: Outline of the Application of Comparative Theories for Q2.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course

Content preview

A-level Politics
Component 3 Revision:

Useful Resources:
Skills Booklet (Super useful for Questions and Exam Guidance)

BBC News/The Times/The Telegraph/Financial Times/The Spectator/The Economist/BBC Radio 4/The Guardian

The Politics Shed

Tutor2u

University of Oxford/Oxford Academic and the London School of Economics and Political Science

A level Politics - Specification

Home - Supreme Court of the United States

United States Congress: Facts and Figures | Think Tank | European Parliament (View PDF within website)

A Comprehensive Guide to All USA Presidents: Their Impact and Legacy

U.S. Constitution | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress (The US Constitution (referencing purposes))

The Constitution and the federal election process | Constitution Center

Trapped in a Two-Party System (Two Party System PDF)

SupremeCourt_LandmarkCases.pdf

Martin Luther King Jr.: Voice of Conscience, Vision of Freedom - Black History Month 2026

The global impact of George Floyd: How Black Lives Matter protests shaped movements around the world - CBS News

List of Interest Groups in the United States 2026

U.S. Presidential Elections: Complete Results 1789-2024

Dark Money Hit a Record High of $1.9 Billion in 2024 Federal Races | Brennan Center for Justice

, US Supreme Court and Civil Rights:

• SCOTUS is the highest appellate court in the land and is made up of 9 permanent justices who sit
for life, nominated by President and confirmed by The Senate.
• Strict Constructionist: interpret as literally written (power of individual states).
• Loose Constructionist: Liberal interpretation to modernise (federal power).
• Originalist: Interprets to the view and attitudes of society at time of writing.
• Living Constitution is a view that the const. is adaptable to modern societal views.
• Judicial Review: The power of SCOTUS to declare unconstitutionality in exec. or leg.
• Judicial Activism: Judges promote desirable social ends (based on personal opinion of ruling)
• Judicial Restraint is opposite, with deference of decisions to exec. and leg.
• Imperial Judiciary: Unelected activist judges overreaching their constitutional power.
• Stare Decisis: ‘Let the decision stand’ refer all cases where possible to past precedent.
• The court has no power to initiate a case or, it relies on public view for legitimacy.
• The Court is political: appointed by President, confirmed by Senate, decisions on electoral
issues (abortion, gun control), some rulings appear as new laws (abortion).
• The Court is not political: cannot be fired so no pressure, justices avoid party politics, judges are
Con. or Lib. not Rep. or Dem., bound by legality of constitution.
• The court has been criticised for being unelected, unaccountable, abusing power and the
inaccuracies of interpretating a ‘living constitution’.
• Civil Rights are those guaranteed to all to prevent discriminatory or arbitrary treatment by
government or individuals.
• Civil Liberties: are those laid out in the constitution that provide protection over rights.
• Affirmative Action: Drive for multiculturalism in reparation for previous discrimination.
• Adv: Diversity, rights wrongdoings, creates equality in education and employment.
• Dis: Reverse discrimination, demographic over skill, encourages social discrimination.
• Since 1965 voting rights have increased with segregation and discrimination being made illegal,
however rooted discrimination has raised questions (e.g. photo ID). [SEE REP. IN CONGRESS].
• Immigration Reform has altered by Presidential turnover (9/11, DACA, Trump/Mexico).
• Roe v Wade (1973) [Supported abortion declaring it a defended right in the constitution].
• Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) [Overturned Roe v Wade and declared
abortion was not defended by 14th amendment of due process].
• Brown v. Board of Education (1954) [overturned Plessy v Ferguson declaring that racial
segregation in schools was unconstitutional].
• Marbury v. Madison (1803) [established JUDICIAL REVIEW].
• Miranda v. Arizona (1966) [established Miranda rights, 5th Amendment, interrogation cannot be
used as evidence in trial].
• Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections (1966) [removed poll taxes from elections demonstrating
wealth should not be a deciding factor of voting rights].
• Shelby County v. Holder (2013) [removed federal power (part of VRA 1965) to inspect state
electoral actions especially those that had previously encouraged disparity in voting].
• Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (2026) [ruled Trump’s tariffs to be unconstitutional].
• On April 6, 2023, it was reported that Thomas and his wife had taken undisclosed luxury trips
from Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow for more than two decades.
• In 2024, Representative AOC drew up impeachment articles for Thomas [These related to the
expenses scandal but not passed].
• Trump v. United States (2024) [This case ruled on the immunity of a previous President and set a
boundary on executive power not necessarily defined in the constitution].
• Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) [In favour of same-sex marriage, 12 years post calls for legalisation].
• United Sates v. Nixon (1974) [Watergate files be released and no one is above the constitution].
• Affirmative Action: Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) FOR, Fisher v. Uni of Texas (2013) FOR, (2016) FOR
WITH SCRUTINY, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023) AGAINST.
• Voting Rights Act (1965)/ George Floyd Justice in Policing Act (2021) [passed in H but not S].

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
May 9, 2026
Number of pages
10
Written in
2025/2026
Type
SUMMARY

Subjects

$22.06
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
leolifford

Also available in package deal

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
leolifford Worcester Sixth Form College
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
-
Member since
2 months
Number of followers
0
Documents
18
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions