100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Essay

The Categorical Imperative and the Humanity Formulation

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
1
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
22-04-2021
Written in
2020/2021

The Categorical Imperative and the Humanity Formulation exam question

Institution
Course

Content preview

Charlotte Logan


The Categorical Imperative and the Humanity Formulation

Explain what is meant by the Categorical Imperative. (5 Marks)

The Categorical Imperative is to act only on that maxim through which you can at the same
time will that it should become a universal law. This was founded by Immanuel Kant. An
example of a rule that fits with the categorical imperative is “do not steal” as it can be
universalised, and we can imagine a world where no one steals. A rule should only be put in
place if it can realistically be universalised and fit to everyone’s life.

Explain what is meant by the Humanity Formulation. (5 Marks)

The Human Formulation is a version of the categorical imperative which states act in a way
that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other,
never simply as a means, but not always at the same time as an ends.

Explain Kant’s test of contradiction of concept and contradiction of will.

The Categorical Imperative is to act only on that maxim through which you can at the same
time will that it should become a universal law. We must go through tests (contradiction of
concept and of will) in order to see if something coincides with the Categorical Imperative.

Contradiction in conception is the test whether we can will a maxim to become a universal
law can be failed. If it fails, it becomes self-contradictory for everyone to act on that maxim.
It would be impossible for everyone to do it so does not fit with the universality. For
example, if everyone stole, property and ownership would have no meaning or value so
society would fail. This highlights how we have a perfect duty not to steal.

The second test is contradiction in will. This is a test for whether we can will a maxim to
become a universal law can be failed if, although the maxim is not self-contradictory, we
cannot rationally will it. For instance, a maxim never to help others, when universalised
would result in a world where no one would want to help me. As I will eventually require
help, it would be a contradiction not to help others. This shows how we have an imperfect
duty to help others. We have a choice whether to fulfil these and if we do it would
subsequently lead to praise.

Written for

Study Level
Examinator
Subject
Unit

Document information

Uploaded on
April 22, 2021
Number of pages
1
Written in
2020/2021
Type
ESSAY
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A+

Subjects

$6.80
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
charlotte_logan
2.0
(2)

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
charlotte_logan
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
3
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
3
Documents
6
Last sold
3 year ago

2.0

2 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
1

Trending documents

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions