CON 1200 Unit 06 | Practice Questions and Correct Answers|2026 Assignment

CON 1200 Unit 06 | Practice Questions and Correct Answers|2026
Assignment

CON 1200 Unit 06: Preparing the Solicitation – Practice Quiz

Question 1

During market research for a complex services acquisition, the contracting officer wants to maximize
industry innovation while maintaining government oversight of outcomes. Which requirements
document approach best achieves this objective?

A. A detailed Statement of Work (SOW) specifying exact methodologies and processes contractors must
follow B. A Performance Work Statement (PWS) describing required outputs and measurable standards
C. A Statement of Objectives (SOO) allowing offerors to propose their own PWS based on government
objectives D. A hybrid SOW/PWS that mandates specific procedures while describing desired outcomes

Correct Answer: C

Explanation: The Statement of Objectives (SOO) provides maximum flexibility to offerors to propose
innovative approaches by stating overall solicitation objectives rather than prescribing how work should
be accomplished

. Under FAR 37.602(c), offerors use the SOO to develop the PWS, though the SOO itself does not become
part of the contract. Option A is incorrect because a detailed SOW dictates "how" work is performed,
stifling innovation. Option B is incorrect because while a PWS describes outputs rather than methods, it
is still government-developed and incorporated into the contract, offering less flexibility than an SOO
approach. Option D is incorrect because mandating specific procedures contradicts the goal of
maximizing innovation. The SOO approach is specifically designed for acquisitions where the
government wants to encourage innovative, cost-effective methods from industry

.



Question 2

The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) has completed initial evaluations of proposals for a major
services contract. Three proposals received "Outstanding" ratings for technical approach, while one
received "Satisfactory." The SSEB Chairperson believes the "Satisfactory" proposal should be excluded
from the competitive range due to its lower rating. What guidance should the PCO provide?

A. The SSEB should recommend exclusion based on the adjectival rating difference B. The SSEB must
conduct a comparative analysis to determine if the rating difference is meaningful C. The SSEB should
not determine competitive range; ratings alone cannot justify exclusion without assessing whether
differences are meaningful D. The SSEB should automatically include all proposals receiving
"Satisfactory" or higher ratings

Correct Answer: C

, Explanation: According to DoD Source Selection Procedures, the SSEB evaluates proposals against
criteria in the solicitation but does not perform comparative analysis or make competitive range
determinations unless specifically directed by the SSA

. The competitive range determination must be based on whether differences between proposals are
meaningful, not merely on adjectival ratings. Option A is incorrect because rating differences alone don't
justify exclusion—the SSA must determine if differences are meaningful. Option B is incorrect because
comparative analysis is the SSA's responsibility, not the SSEB's. Option D is incorrect because automatic
inclusion based on rating thresholds violates the principle of meaningful discrimination. The SSEB's role
is to document strengths, weaknesses, and risks, leaving the competitive range decision to the SSA
based on whether the "Satisfactory" proposal has a reasonable chance of being selected for award

.



Question 3

A requiring activity submits a procurement request for IT support services estimated at $15 million. The
requirement combines network administration, help desk operations, and cybersecurity monitoring—
three functions previously performed under separate contracts by small businesses. The contracting
officer suspects bundling. What threshold triggers the additional documentation requirements for
"substantial bundling" in DoD?

A. $2 million B. $8 million C. $10 million D. $25 million

Correct Answer: B

Explanation: Substantial bundling is defined in FAR 7.107-4 as any bundling that results in a contract or
order with an estimated value of $8 million or more for DoD

. This threshold applies to the cumulative estimated dollar value, including multiple award contracts and
task orders against GSA Schedules. Option A ($2 million) is incorrect as it doesn't correspond to any
defined bundling threshold. Option C ($10 million) and D ($25 million) are incorrect as they exceed the
actual threshold. When substantial bundling occurs, the agency must document specific benefits, assess
impediments to small business participation, describe actions to maximize small business participation
as primes and subcontractors, and analyze alternative strategies

. The contracting officer must determine whether combining these requirements is necessary and
justified given the small business impact.



Question 4

Under DFARS, when is a written Acquisition Plan required for a services acquisition?

A. For all services acquisitions exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold B. For all acquisitions
exceeding $10 million C. When required by agency procedures or for high-risk, complex acquisitions
regardless of dollar value D. Only for major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs)