100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary GDL Public Law Revision Notes (Distinction)

Rating
5.0
(2)
Sold
13
Pages
13
Uploaded on
20-04-2021
Written in
2019/2020

A collection of revision notes for the public law module on the GDL at the University of Law. The document includes: - three essay question plans on the flexibility of the UK constitution, the separation of powers, and parliamentary supremacy - four flowcharts on answering problem questions about judicial review, judicial review involving human rights, conflict of human rights (Articles 8 and 10), and contempt of court - key statutory and case law authorities for all the above topics These revision notes were what I used to achieve a Distinction in the public law exam I sat in January 2020. All information in them was correct as of the academic year 2019/20.

Show more Read less
Institution
Course









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
Study
Course

Document information

Uploaded on
April 20, 2021
Number of pages
13
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Summary

Subjects

Content preview

PUBLIC LAW REVISION NOTES
GDL (University of Law)



Essay Question Plans
Flexibility of Constitution
Separation of Powers
Parliamentary Supremacy

Flowcharts
Judicial Review
Judicial Review Based on Human Rights
Conflict of Human Rights
Contempt of Court

Key Authorities
UK Constitution
Separation of Powers
Parliamentary Supremacy
Judicial Review
Human Rights
Conflict of Human Rights
Contempt of Court




All notes correct and Distinction worthy as of
academic year 2019/20

, Flexibility of Constitution

Introduction
Explain that we don’t have a written constitution and why
Introduce debate about whether this means our constitution is flexible and easier to change than
written constitutions

Constitutional Conventions
Define conventions i.e. non-legal rules which interact with legal rules to enhance operation of
government
Marshall and Moodie “rules of constitutional behaviour”
Provide examples: monarch will always grant Royal Assent, Ministers must be MPs, collective cabinet
responsibility, individual ministerial responsibility
No legal mechanisms in place to ensure they are followed – Madzimbamuto 1968, Miller 2017
But treated as binding and would have drastic consequences if ignored

Statute
Define statute i.e. legislation of constitutional significance that has been passed by Parliament,
fulfilling the functions of a codified constitution
Provide examples: Scotland Act 1998, Human Rights Act 1998, European Communities Act 1972
Legally binding and can be enforced by the courts
Can be repealed and altered at any time with the consent of Parliament and without any kind of
special procedure/super majority
But many would certainly be politically difficult/impossible to repeal e.g. Scotland Act 1998, Acts of
Independence throughout twentieth century

Case Law
Define case law i.e. because we have a common law system, case law has established some of our
constitutional rights and rules
Provide examples: residual freedoms e.g. you may do anything that is not expressly prohibited by
law, legal disputes must be resolved by the judiciary (Case of Prohibitions)
Case law can be inflexible and difficult to change as many courts are bound by previous decisions
The Supreme Court is not bound by precedent but in practice rarely rules against itself
Many of the rights established by case law are entrenched in our society e.g. habeas corpus – an
individual detained by the state has the right to have the legality of that detention tested by a court –
confirmed recently in Belmarsh case 2005

Royal Prerogative
Define RP i.e. the remaining legal powers which were once exercised by the monarch alone but which
are now largely held by the government
Provide examples: power to declare war, sign treaties, grant mercy
These powers are slowly changing and being reduced by new conventions and statutes so in a way
are flexible e.g. emerging convention that PM should seek Parliament’s consent to declare war,
Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011
Courts now demonstrating that they will review exercise of the RP in some cases e.g. CCSU

Conclusion
Constitution does have more flexibility than a written constitution
However, bringing about change remains a sometimes difficult and/or slow process
$12.31
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached


Document also available in package deal

Reviews from verified buyers

Showing all 2 reviews
2 year ago

3 year ago

5.0

2 reviews

5
2
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0
Trustworthy reviews on Stuvia

All reviews are made by real Stuvia users after verified purchases.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
ulawemily University of Law
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
229
Member since
4 year
Number of followers
122
Documents
5
Last sold
2 months ago

4.8

34 reviews

5
28
4
5
3
1
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions