100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Case

NR 601 Week 5 Diabetes Case Study Assignment: Mrs G., 56-Year Old Hispanic Female

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
20
Grade
A
Uploaded on
01-04-2021
Written in
2020/2021

NR 601 Week 5 Diabetes Case Study Assignment: Mrs G., 56-Year Old Hispanic Female Week 5 Case Study In this case study I will be looking at the overall health of Mrs. G, a 55 year old Hispanic women. She is coming into the office with multiple health complaints. After reviewing her history and doing my physical exam I have decided to diagnose Mrs. G with type 2 diabetes. This case study goes over this diagnosis, other secondary diagnoses, differential diagnoses, a treatment plan, as well as education I would provide to the patient. Assessment Primary Diagnosis- Type 2 diabetes with unspecified complications (E11.8) Pathophysiology- Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, multisystem, metabolic syndrome of gradual onset characterized by an insufficient body tissue response to insulin and impaired pancreatic production of insulin. Signs and symptoms of type 2 diabetes are fatigue, recurrent infections, prolonged wound healing, polyuria, polydipsia, weight changes, and polyphagia (Schub & Parks-Chapman, 2018). pertinent positive findings- Pt endorses polydipsia, polyphagia, weight gain, polyuria, fatigue. Physical exam shows obesity, 1 glucose in urine, small protein in urine, A1C of 6.9% (Schub & Parks-Chapman, 2018). pertinent negative findings- Glucose 95, no history of prediabetes, no family history of diabetes (Schub & Parks-Chapman, 2018). With the patient’s subjective findings and the A1C level of 6.9%, this patient meets the clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (Schub & Parks-Chapman, 2018). rationale for the diagnosis- Because of the strong pertinent positives and associated lab work with this patient, I would definitely diagnoses her with type 2 diabetes. Her subjective and objective data all fit within the common symptoms of type 2 diabetes. Also, according to the ADA guidelines, any patient with am A1C of >6.5% meets the criteria for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (American Diabetes Association, 2019). Secondary Diagnosis- Hyperlipidemia, unspecified (E78.5) Pathophysiology- Hyperlipidemia is major cardiovascular risk factor that is caused by having abnormally high levels of different types of cholesterol in your blood. It increases the rate of atherosclerotic disease and can be caused by obesity, metabolic syndrome, thyroid dysfunction or familial traits (Kennedy-Malone, Plank, & Duffy, 2019). pertinent positive findings- TC 230, LDL 144, Triglycerides 232, obesity, new diagnosis of diabetes, father with high cholesterol (Kennedy-Malone, Plank, & Duffy, 2019). pertinent negative findings- Non-smoker, not hypertensive (Kennedy-Malone, Plank, & Duffy, 2019). This patient currently has high total cholesterol, high triglycerides and low HDLs. Even though the patient is a non-smoker and is hot hypertensive, she still meets the criteria for having hyperlipidemia (Kennedy-Malone, Plank, & Duffy, 2019). rationale for the diagnosis- The patients new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes is one of the main reasons I have added on the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. When a patient has diabetes, the threshold for cholesterol levels lower and treatment is needed at different levels than in a patient without diabetes. Because the patient has mildly elevated cholesterol of 230 with LDLs of 144, along with her age and diabetes status, she is considered high risk and needs to be started on a moderate-intensity statin (Grundy, Stone, Bailey, Beam,... & Goldberg, 2018). Secondary Diagnosis- Obesity (E66.9) Pathophysiology- Obesity is defined as any persons having a body mass index (BMI) of greater than 30mg/m2. More than half of all adults in the United States are overweight or obese (Marcel, & Smith, 2018). pertinent positive findings BMI 33.37kg/m2 (Marcel, & Smith, 2018). pertinent negative findings- None (Marcel, & Smith, 2018). With the patient having a BMI of 33.37 and no negative findings, this patient will be diagnosed with obesity (Marcel, & Smith, 2018). rationale for the diagnosis- With a weight of 185 and a height of 62.5 inches it puts the patients BMI at 33.73kg/m2. Obesity is important to include as a diagnosis because type 2 diabetes is more likely to occur in obese patients and weight reduction strategies will be important for her overall health (Marcel, & Smith, 2018). Differential Diagnosis- Metabolic Syndrome (E88.81) pathophysiology- Metabolic syndrome is a constellation of metabolic abnormalities that increase a person’s chances of developing CVD and DM2. Diagnosis is considered when a patient presents with three of more of the following conditions: Abdominal obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL, hypertension, hyperinsulinemia (Schub, 2018). pertinent positive findings- Hypertriglyceridemia, Low HDLs (Schub, 2018). pertinent negative findings- No hypertension, no hyperinsulinemia (Schub, 2018). This patient currently has triglycerides of 232 which categorizes her as having hypertriglyceridemia, she also has an HDL of 38, which is below the recommended level of 50

Show more Read less










Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
April 1, 2021
Number of pages
20
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Case
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A

Subjects

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
INTELLECT CAPELLA UNIVERSITY
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
2758
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
2534
Documents
3197
Last sold
1 month ago
BEST HOMEWORK HELP AND TUTORING

I have done papers of various topics and complexities. I am punctual and always submit work on-deadline. I write engaging and informative content on all subjects. Send me your research papers, case studies, psychology papers, etc, and I’ll do them to the best of my abilities. Writing is my passion when it comes to academic work. I’ve got a good sense of structure and enjoy finding interesting ways to deliver information in any given paper. I love impressing clients with my work, and I am very punctual about deadlines. Send me your assignment and I’ll take it to the next level. I strive for my content to be of the highest quality. Your wishes come first— send me your requirements and I’ll make a piece of work with fresh ideas, consistent structure, and following the academic formatting rules. For every student you refer to me with an order that is completed and paid transparently, I will do one assignment for you, free of charge!!!!!!!!!!!!

Read more Read less
3.7

338 reviews

5
157
4
52
3
51
2
19
1
59

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions