LBO Modeling
Fundamentals
Quiz Questions
and Answers
Verified and
Updated 2026
, Which of the following statements below are TRUE regarding why an LBO works
k k k k k k k k k k k k k
conceptually?
a. By using debt, the PE firm reduces up-front cash required, thereby boosting returns
k k k k k k k k k k k k k
b. Using cash flows produced by the company to pay down debt and make interest payments
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
produces a better return for the PE firm than simply keeping the cash flows k k k k k k k k k k k k k
c. Since the PE firm sells the entire company in the future, it's guaranteed to at least get back
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
100% of its original capital k k k k
d. The PE firm sells the company in the future, which allows it to get back (at least some of) the
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
funds that it used to acquire the company in the first place - correct answerExplanation:
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
Statements A, B, and D are all true. By using little of its own cash and borrowing heavily to k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
purchase the company, the PE fund significantly boosts its returns for the simple reason that k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
money today is worth more than money tomorrow due to the interest that it could earn. In an
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
LBO, the PE fund uses the cash flows of the company it acquires to pay debt principal and debt
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
interest, which is a much better use of those funds than keeping the money for itself, again
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
boosting returns. The other reason LBOs work in practice and earn such high returns is k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
because the PE fund only operates the company for 3 to 5 years before it sells it off and regains k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
its money plus profit; if the PE fund were to keep the companies it purchased indefinitely, it
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
would not be possible to earn the returns that PE funds seek. C is incorrect because there's no
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
"guarantee" that the PE fund will get back 100% of its original capital - if the company's k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
EBITDA declines or if the exit multiple declines significantly, for example, that may not k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
happen.
What's the best analogy to use when thinking of how a leveraged buyout works?
k k k k k k k k k k k k k
a. A homeowner buys a house to live in with a down payment and mortgage,
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
and then sells the house in the future once the mortgage is repaid
k k k k k k k k k k k k
b. An investor buys a house to rent out to tenants, using a down payment and mortgage, then
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
uses the rental income to repay the mortgage, and then sells
k k k k k k k k k k
the house in the future
k k k k
c. A person buys a car using cash and a car loan, drives it for several years, repays the debt,
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
and then sells the car k k k k
d. None of the above - correct answerExplanation: B is correct because that is exactly what
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
happens in an k k
LBO - you buy a company that generates cash flows, you use the cash flows to repay debt, and
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
then sell it off at the end of several years. A is incorrect because a house that you live in is not an
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
income-generating asset. So it is not the best way to think of an LBO. C is incorrect because k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
unlike a house, cars always depreciate in value and you'll likely lose a lot of money after buying
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
it, running it, and selling it... plus cars do not generate income, unlike rental houses.
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
Fundamentals
Quiz Questions
and Answers
Verified and
Updated 2026
, Which of the following statements below are TRUE regarding why an LBO works
k k k k k k k k k k k k k
conceptually?
a. By using debt, the PE firm reduces up-front cash required, thereby boosting returns
k k k k k k k k k k k k k
b. Using cash flows produced by the company to pay down debt and make interest payments
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
produces a better return for the PE firm than simply keeping the cash flows k k k k k k k k k k k k k
c. Since the PE firm sells the entire company in the future, it's guaranteed to at least get back
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
100% of its original capital k k k k
d. The PE firm sells the company in the future, which allows it to get back (at least some of) the
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
funds that it used to acquire the company in the first place - correct answerExplanation:
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
Statements A, B, and D are all true. By using little of its own cash and borrowing heavily to k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
purchase the company, the PE fund significantly boosts its returns for the simple reason that k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
money today is worth more than money tomorrow due to the interest that it could earn. In an
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
LBO, the PE fund uses the cash flows of the company it acquires to pay debt principal and debt
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
interest, which is a much better use of those funds than keeping the money for itself, again
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
boosting returns. The other reason LBOs work in practice and earn such high returns is k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
because the PE fund only operates the company for 3 to 5 years before it sells it off and regains k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
its money plus profit; if the PE fund were to keep the companies it purchased indefinitely, it
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
would not be possible to earn the returns that PE funds seek. C is incorrect because there's no
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
"guarantee" that the PE fund will get back 100% of its original capital - if the company's k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
EBITDA declines or if the exit multiple declines significantly, for example, that may not k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
happen.
What's the best analogy to use when thinking of how a leveraged buyout works?
k k k k k k k k k k k k k
a. A homeowner buys a house to live in with a down payment and mortgage,
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
and then sells the house in the future once the mortgage is repaid
k k k k k k k k k k k k
b. An investor buys a house to rent out to tenants, using a down payment and mortgage, then
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
uses the rental income to repay the mortgage, and then sells
k k k k k k k k k k
the house in the future
k k k k
c. A person buys a car using cash and a car loan, drives it for several years, repays the debt,
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
and then sells the car k k k k
d. None of the above - correct answerExplanation: B is correct because that is exactly what
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
happens in an k k
LBO - you buy a company that generates cash flows, you use the cash flows to repay debt, and
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
then sell it off at the end of several years. A is incorrect because a house that you live in is not an
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
income-generating asset. So it is not the best way to think of an LBO. C is incorrect because k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
unlike a house, cars always depreciate in value and you'll likely lose a lot of money after buying
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k k
it, running it, and selling it... plus cars do not generate income, unlike rental houses.
k k k k k k k k k k k k k k