Theories Of Personality 10th Edition
by Ryckman All 18 Chapters Covered
Table of Contents
PART I: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE DISCIPLINE.
1. Personality and the Scientific Outlook.
PART II: PSYCHOANALYTIC AND NEOANALYTIC PERSPECTIVES.
2. Freud's Psychoanalytic Perspectives.
3. Jung's Analytical Psychology.
4. Adler's Individual Psychology.
5. Horney's Social and Cultural Psychoanalysis.
6. Erikson's Psychoanalytic Ego Psychology.
7. Kohut's Self Psychology.
PART III: TRAIT PERSPECTIVES.
8. Allport's Trait Theory.
1
,9. Cattell's Structure-Based Systems Theory.
10. Eysenck's Biological Typology.
PART IV: COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVES.
11. Kelly's Theory of Personal Constructs.
PART V: HUMANISTIC/EXISTENTIAL PERSPECTIVES.
12. Maslow's Self-Actualization Position.
13. Roger's Person-Centered Theory.
14. May's Existential-Analytic Position.
PART VI: SOCIAL-BEHAVIORISTIC PERSPECTIVES.
15. Skinner's Operant Analysis.
16. Rotter's Expectancy Reinforcement Value Model.
17. Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory.
PART VII: THE ROLE OF THE GRAND THEORIES IN
CONTEMPORARY PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY.
18. Theory and Research in Contemporary Personality Psychology.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
I. Why study personality? The study of human personality helps us understand ourselves and
other people better and gives us a greater appreciation for the complexity of human
experience.
2
,II. Definition of Personality: Personality is the dynamic and organized set of characteristics
possessed by an individual that uniquely influences his or her cognitions, motivations and
behaviors in various situations.
III. Personality and Science: Personality is a scientific enterprise concerned with the description,
explanation, prediction, and control of events.
A. Components of Science: Theories and Research Methods
1. What are theories? A theory is a system of interrelated conceptual statements that are
created by investigators to account for a phenomenon or a set of phenomena.
2. Kinds of theories
a. inductive-sets of general summary statements about phenomena derived from facts.
b. deductive-theories in which specific hypotheses are derived from abstract propositions
and then tested by the collection of data. Deductive theories consist of postulates,
propositions, conceptual definitions, operational definitions, hypotheses, and empirical
observations.
1. postulates-the fundamental or core assumptions of a theory. They are taken as self-
evidently true in order to provide a clear and focused direction for theorizing and
research.
2. propositions- general relational statements that may be true or false. They are not tested
directly; instead, hypotheses are derived from them.
3. hypotheses-specific propositions containing constructs that are conceptually defined and
operationalized so they can tested and confirmed or disconfirmed through empirical
testing. Hypotheses are tentative theoretical statements about how events are related to
one another, often stated as predictions.
a. a prior predictions-predictions made before the collection of data.
4. conceptual definitions- concepts in the hypotheses are defined precisely so that accurate
measures of the concepts can be devised.
5. operational definitions- procedures (or operations) used to define particular constructs.
6. empirical observations-observations of phenomena made by investigators.
1V. Research Methods Used to Test Theories
A. Experimental Method-technique for studying cause-and- effect relationships between
variables. It involves the manipulation of independent variables and observation of the
effects of the manipulation(s) on dependent variables.
1. independent variables-the variables actively manipulated by the experimenter so that
their effects on individual behavior can be observed.
2. dependent variables-changes in behavior that occur as a result of the manipulation of
conditions by an experimenter.
3. control group-the group that does not receive the experimental treatment. It is designed
to provide baseline data against which the effects of the experimental manipulation(s) on
the dependent variable(s) can be accurately judged.
B. Correlational Method-general procedure for establishing an association or relationship
3
, between events.
1. positive correlation-increases in the scores on one variable are associated with increases
in the scores on the other variable.
2. negative correlation-increases in the scores on one variable are associated with
decreases in the scores on the other.
3. no relation-the distributions of scores on the two variables are random
C. Case Study Method-technique involving the intensive study of a single person in order to
understand his or her unique personality and behavior.
1. post-hoc explanation-explanation of a phenomenon given after its occurrence.
V. Ethics for Conducting Research
A. informed consent-the practice of telling study participants about the nature of their
participation in a proposed experiment and then obtaining their written agreement to
participate.
B. debriefing-informing study participants of the true nature and purpose of a study after it is
completed.
VI. Criteria for Evaluating Theories
A. Comprehensiveness-theories are judged as more adequate and useful if they encompass
and account for a wide range and variety of phenomena.
B. Precision and testability- adequate theories should contain constructs and relational
statements that are clearly and explicitly stated and measured. Under such conditions,
theories can be more accurately tested.
C. Parsimony- adequate theories should be as economical as possible, while still adequately
accounting for the phenomena in their domain.
D. Empirical validity- the hypotheses of theories are tested by the collection of data to
determine whether or not they are accurate.
E. Heuristic value- adequate theories should be challenging; they should stimulate new ideas
and new research.
F. Applied value- adequate theories are capable of providing creative solutions to problems
that are of interest and concern to people in society.
CLASSROOM TOPICS FOR LECTURE, DISCUSSION, AND DEMONSTRATION
Judging the Scientific Worth of a Theory: Which Criterion is Most Important? Present the 6
criteria for judging the scientific worth of a theory and ask the students which one of them is the
most important. Since most students, especially those who have taken several courses in
psychology, are imbued with the need to have data to support whatever conclusions they reach
and will immediately say empirical validity. You can then mention that you're not so sure. You
can create a theory on the spot that lacks comprehensiveness but has massive empirical support.
Walk up the classroom aisle until you find a male and a female sitting next to one another. Then
tell the students you will create a theory of infatuation, saying that if the female likes the male
sitting next to her, she will figure that if she sits next to him at each session, that they will begin
4