100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Samenvatting Video's Sociale psychologie I

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
14
Geüpload op
14-01-2026
Geschreven in
2025/2026

In dit document zijn alle 'video's bij de les' samengevat. Bij elke video geef een uitleg die meer als voldoende is om de vragen op het examen te kunnen beantwoorden, op de examens zijn hier een 3/4tal vragen aan gerelateerd. Dit document spaart je een hoop tijd uit zodat je niet alle video's zelf moet gaan kijken. Mijn uitleg is in de taal van de video's zelf (Nederlands of Engels). Als ze in het engels zijn is het geen moeilijk engels.

Meer zien Lees minder
Instelling
Vak









Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Geschreven voor

Instelling
Studie
Vak

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
14 januari 2026
Aantal pagina's
14
Geschreven in
2025/2026
Type
Samenvatting

Onderwerpen

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY I – VIDEO’S

H1 – Introduc-on to social psychology

1.1 Bystander effect

= If you are a person in need, your chances of ge5ng help increase as the number of people
available to help decrease.

In the video we see a person in need: a student lying on the floor of a hallway. Many other
students pass by without doing anything; some even seem to ‘enjoy the show’. Others look
but don’t take acFon. Eventually, somebody helps.

à The person was a teacher, and it is her job to help. The Bystander effect sFll applies to
modern society.

1.2 Prison (Zimbardo)

Goal of the experiment: To study the behavioural and psychological consequences of
becoming a prisoner or a prison guard.

Prior to the experiment:
A simulated prison environment was created, both mentally and physically. Prison experts
helped make it look and feel as realisFc as possible. The experiment was planned to last two
weeks. ParFcipants were selected aPer compleFng psychological tests; 20 students with no
psychological differences from across the US were chosen. They were randomly assigned to
the role of “prisoner” or “guard”.

During the experiment:
During the first “count” of the prisoners, they did not fully take on their roles. The guards
tried to show authority but also experienced difficulFes. APer a while, the guards became
more comfortable in their role and began using physical punishment (e.g. push-ups).
Eventually, they started punishing prisoners without reason; the guards became increasingly
unreasonable and the situaFon escalated. The prisoners were forced to do various degrading
tasks (such as cleaning toilets and urinaFng in buckets in their cells).

APer the experiment:
One guard explained how surprised he was by his own behaviour. He never thought he
would be capable of acFng that way and felt he had lost control. During the experiment, he
did not feel guilt or regret; these feelings only emerged aPerwards, when he reflected on his
acFons.


1

, 1.3 Obedience (Milgram, Yale - 1960)

Goal of the experiment:
To gain insight into why so many Germans willingly obeyed immoral orders during the
Holocaust.

During the experiment:
Teacher and learner were placed in a laboratory se5ng. The “teacher” was the real subject
of the experiment. The teacher had to administer electric shocks to the learner every Fme a
mistake was made, with the voltage increasing aPer each error. The learner was not visible to
the teacher and did not actually receive shocks; the reacFons were acted out by making
sounds. An authority figure was present and instructed the teacher to conFnue, even when
the learner appeared to be in pain.

APer the experiment:
Surprisingly, the majority of parFcipants (65%) conFnued to the highest shock level when an
authority figure was present and encouraged them to go on.

Example in the video:
The learner begged to be released and eventually pretended to lose consciousness. Even
then, the teacher conFnued when the authority figure gave the commands.

1.4 Face Rear (New York – 1962)

Goal of the experiment: test group pressure.

During the experiment:
There is always one candidate subject who does not know they are part of an experiment,
along with several staff members. They all enter the same elevator. All the staff members
face the back of the elevator, which is quite unusual.

The quesFon is whether the candidate will do the same or stand the way they normally
would.

Many parFcipants are iniFally unsure what to do but eventually give in to group pressure and
stand in exactly the same posiFon as the staff members. When the staff suddenly change
posiFon, the candidate follows. Even when the staff members take off their hats, the
candidate subject also imitates this behaviour.




2
$8.10
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
alim2006

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
alim2006 Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
7
Lid sinds
9 maanden
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
4
Laatst verkocht
1 week geleden

0.0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via Bancontact, iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo eenvoudig kan het zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen