100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Tort Law Unit 1: Complete Summary + IRAC Case Briefs + Exam Guide (2025 High Distinction Edition)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
7
Uploaded on
05-01-2026
Written in
2025/2026

This document is a complete, Tort Law Unit 1 study guide, designed for first‑year law students who want clear explanations, detailed case briefs, and an exam‑ready structure. It combines full topic summaries, high‑quality IRAC case briefs, and a step‑by‑step exam outline to help you understand, memorize, and apply Tort Law principles with confidence.

Show more Read less









Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Uploaded on
January 5, 2026
Number of pages
7
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Summary

Content preview

UNIT 1: FOUNDATIONS OF TORT LAW
1. What Is Tort Law? (Detailed Summary)
Tort law is the branch of private law that deals with civil wrongs. Its purpose is to
compensate individuals who suffer harm due to another’s wrongful conduct. Unlike
criminal law, which punishes offenders, tort law focuses on:

• Compensation

• Deterrence

• Corrective justice

• Loss distribution

Key Functions of Tort Law
• Provides remedies for harm

• Encourages safer behaviour

• Allocates risk fairly

• Protects bodily integrity, property, and economic interests




📘 UNIT 1 CORE TOPICS (DETAILED)
TOPIC 1: ELEMENTS OF NEGLIGENCE
Negligence is the most important tort. To succeed, a plaintiff must prove:
1. Duty of Care

2. Breach of Duty

3. Causation (factual + legal)

4. Damage

5. No applicable defences



⭐ 1. DUTY OF CARE (Deep Summary)
Duty of care asks: Does the defendant owe the plaintiff a legal obligation to take
reasonable care?

, Historical Development
• Donoghue v Stevenson established the modern duty of care.

• Introduced the “neighbour principle”:

You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably
foresee would likely injure your neighbour.

Modern Approach

Courts consider:
• Foreseeability of harm

• Proximity between parties

• Whether it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty

• Policy considerations

Categories of Duty
• Manufacturer → consumer

• Doctor → patient

• Driver → road users

• Teacher → student

• Occupier → visitor




⭐ IRAC CASE BRIEF: Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)
Issue:
Did the manufacturer owe a duty of care to a consumer who did not purchase the
product directly?

Rule:
A manufacturer owes a duty to the ultimate consumer if harm is reasonably
foreseeable.

Application:
Stevenson produced ginger beer with a decomposed snail inside. Donoghue consumed
it and became ill. Even though she did not buy the drink herself, the manufacturer
should have foreseen that consumers rely on the product being safe.
$3.22
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
sinamilemadlala08

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
sinamilemadlala08 University of South Africa (Unisa)
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
New on Stuvia
Member since
1 week
Number of followers
0
Documents
7
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions