TEST BANK C C
Introduction to Statistical Investigations,
C C C C
2nd Edition Nathan Tintle; Beth L. Chance
C C C C C C
Chapters 1 - 11, Complete
C C C C C
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y
,TABLE OF CONTENTS
C C C
Chapter 1 – Significance: How Strong is the Evidence
C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 2 – Generalization: How Broadly Do the Results Apply?
C C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 3 – Estimation: How Large is the Effect?
C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 4 – Causation: Can We Say What Caused the Effect?
C C C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 5 – Comparing Two Proportions
C C C C C C
Chapter 6 – Comparing Two Means
C C C C C C
Chapter 7 – Paired Data: One Quantitative Variable
C C C C C C C C
Chapter 8 – Comparing More Than Two Proportions
C C C C C C C C
Chapter 9 – Comparing More Than Two Means
C C C C C C C C
Chapter 10 – Two Quantitative Variables
C C C C C C
Chapter 11 – Modeling Randomness
C C C C
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y
,Chapter 1 C
Note:CCCTEC =C TextCentry TE-NC=CTextCentryC-
CNumericCMaC =C Matching MSC =C MultipleCselect
MCC =C MultipleCchoice TFC=CTrue-
FalseCEC=CEasy,CMC=CMedium,CHC=CHard
CHAPTER 1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES
C C C
CLO1-1:CUseCtheCchanceCmodelCtoCdetermineCwhetherCanCobservedCstatisticCisCunlikelyCtoCoccur.
CLO1-2:CCalculateCandCinterpretCaCp-
value,CandCstateCtheCstrengthCofCevidenceCitCprovidesCagainstCtheCnullChypothesis.
CLO1-
3:CCalculateCaCstandardizedCstatisticCforCaCsingleCproportionCandCevaluateCtheCstrengthCofCevide
nceCitCprovidesCagainstCaCnullChypothesis.
CLO1-
4:CDescribeChowCtheCdistanceCofCtheCobservedCstatisticCfromCtheCparameterCvalueCspecifiedCbyCtheC
nullChypothesis,CsampleCsize,CandCone-Cvs.Ctwo-
sidedCtestsCaffectCtheCstrengthCofCevidenceCagainstCtheCnullChypothesis.
CLO1-5:CDescribeChowCtoCcarryCoutCaCtheory-based,Cone-proportionCz-test.
Section 1.1: Introduction to Chance Models
C C C C C
LO1.1-1:CRecognizeCtheCdifferenceCbetweenCparametersCandCstatistics.
LO1.1-2:CDescribeChowCtoCuseCcoinCtossingCtoCsimulateCoutcomesCfromCaCchanceCmodelCofCtheCran-
domCchoiceCbetweenCtwoCevents.
C
LO1.1-3:CUseCtheCOneCProportionCappletCtoCcarryCoutCtheCcoinCtossingCsimulation.
LO1.1-
4:CIdentifyCwhetherCorCnotCstudyCresultsCareCstatisticallyCsignificantCandCwhetherCorCnotCtheCcha
nceCmodelCisCaCplausibleCexplanationCforCtheCdata.
LO1.1-
5:CImplementCtheC3SCstrategy:CfindCaCstatistic,CsimulateCresultsCfromCaCchanceCmodel,CandCcomm
entConCstrengthCofCevidenceCagainstCobservedCstudyCresultsChappeningCbyCchanceCalone.
LO1.1-
6:CDifferentiateCbetweenCsayingCtheCchanceCmodelCisCplausibleCandCtheCchanceCmodelCisCtheCcorrec
tCexplanationCforCtheCobservedCdata.
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y
, 1-2 TestCBankCforCIntroductionCtoCStatisticalCInvestigations,C2ndCEdition
QuestionsC1CthroughC4:
DoCredCuniformCwearersCtendCtoCwinCmoreCoftenCthanCthoseCwearingCblueCuniformsCinCTaekwond
oCmatchesCwhereCcompetitorsCareCrandomlyCassignedCtoCwearCeitherCaCredCorCblueCuniform?CInCa
CsampleCofC80CTaekwondoCmatches,CthereCwereC45CmatchesCwhereCtheC redCuniformCwearerCwon.
1. WhatCisCtheCparameterCofCinterestCforCthisCstudy?
A. TheClong-runCproportionCofCTaekwondoCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwins
B. TheCproportionCofCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCinCaCsampleCofC80CTaek
wondoCmatches
C. WhetherCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCaCmatch
D.C 0.50
Ans:CA;CLO:C1.1-1;CDifficulty:CEasy;CType:CMC
2. WhatCisCtheCstatisticCforCthisCstudy?
A. TheClong-runCproportionCofCTaekwondoCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwins
B. TheCproportionCofCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCinCaCsampleCofC80CTaek
wondoCmatches
C. WhetherCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCaCmatch
D.C 0.50
Ans:CB;CLO:C1.1-1;CDifficulty:CEasy;CType:CMC
3. GivenCbelowCisCtheCsimulatedCdistributionCofCtheCnumberCofC―redCwins‖CthatCcouldChappenCbyCcha
nceCaloneCinCaCsampleCofC80Cmatches.CBasedConCthisCsimulation,CisCourCobservedCresultCstatistically
Csignificant?
A. Yes,CsinceC45CisClargerCthanC40.
B. Yes,CsinceCtheCheightCofCtheCdotplotCaboveC45CisCsmallerCthanCtheCheightCofCtheCdotpl
otCaboveC40.
C. No,CsinceC45CisCaCfairlyCtypicalCoutcomeCifCtheCcolorCofCtheCwinner‘sCuniformCwasCdeter
minedCbyCchanceCalone.
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y
Introduction to Statistical Investigations,
C C C C
2nd Edition Nathan Tintle; Beth L. Chance
C C C C C C
Chapters 1 - 11, Complete
C C C C C
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y
,TABLE OF CONTENTS
C C C
Chapter 1 – Significance: How Strong is the Evidence
C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 2 – Generalization: How Broadly Do the Results Apply?
C C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 3 – Estimation: How Large is the Effect?
C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 4 – Causation: Can We Say What Caused the Effect?
C C C C C C C C C C C
Chapter 5 – Comparing Two Proportions
C C C C C C
Chapter 6 – Comparing Two Means
C C C C C C
Chapter 7 – Paired Data: One Quantitative Variable
C C C C C C C C
Chapter 8 – Comparing More Than Two Proportions
C C C C C C C C
Chapter 9 – Comparing More Than Two Means
C C C C C C C C
Chapter 10 – Two Quantitative Variables
C C C C C C
Chapter 11 – Modeling Randomness
C C C C
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y
,Chapter 1 C
Note:CCCTEC =C TextCentry TE-NC=CTextCentryC-
CNumericCMaC =C Matching MSC =C MultipleCselect
MCC =C MultipleCchoice TFC=CTrue-
FalseCEC=CEasy,CMC=CMedium,CHC=CHard
CHAPTER 1 LEARNING OBJECTIVES
C C C
CLO1-1:CUseCtheCchanceCmodelCtoCdetermineCwhetherCanCobservedCstatisticCisCunlikelyCtoCoccur.
CLO1-2:CCalculateCandCinterpretCaCp-
value,CandCstateCtheCstrengthCofCevidenceCitCprovidesCagainstCtheCnullChypothesis.
CLO1-
3:CCalculateCaCstandardizedCstatisticCforCaCsingleCproportionCandCevaluateCtheCstrengthCofCevide
nceCitCprovidesCagainstCaCnullChypothesis.
CLO1-
4:CDescribeChowCtheCdistanceCofCtheCobservedCstatisticCfromCtheCparameterCvalueCspecifiedCbyCtheC
nullChypothesis,CsampleCsize,CandCone-Cvs.Ctwo-
sidedCtestsCaffectCtheCstrengthCofCevidenceCagainstCtheCnullChypothesis.
CLO1-5:CDescribeChowCtoCcarryCoutCaCtheory-based,Cone-proportionCz-test.
Section 1.1: Introduction to Chance Models
C C C C C
LO1.1-1:CRecognizeCtheCdifferenceCbetweenCparametersCandCstatistics.
LO1.1-2:CDescribeChowCtoCuseCcoinCtossingCtoCsimulateCoutcomesCfromCaCchanceCmodelCofCtheCran-
domCchoiceCbetweenCtwoCevents.
C
LO1.1-3:CUseCtheCOneCProportionCappletCtoCcarryCoutCtheCcoinCtossingCsimulation.
LO1.1-
4:CIdentifyCwhetherCorCnotCstudyCresultsCareCstatisticallyCsignificantCandCwhetherCorCnotCtheCcha
nceCmodelCisCaCplausibleCexplanationCforCtheCdata.
LO1.1-
5:CImplementCtheC3SCstrategy:CfindCaCstatistic,CsimulateCresultsCfromCaCchanceCmodel,CandCcomm
entConCstrengthCofCevidenceCagainstCobservedCstudyCresultsChappeningCbyCchanceCalone.
LO1.1-
6:CDifferentiateCbetweenCsayingCtheCchanceCmodelCisCplausibleCandCtheCchanceCmodelCisCtheCcorrec
tCexplanationCforCtheCobservedCdata.
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y
, 1-2 TestCBankCforCIntroductionCtoCStatisticalCInvestigations,C2ndCEdition
QuestionsC1CthroughC4:
DoCredCuniformCwearersCtendCtoCwinCmoreCoftenCthanCthoseCwearingCblueCuniformsCinCTaekwond
oCmatchesCwhereCcompetitorsCareCrandomlyCassignedCtoCwearCeitherCaCredCorCblueCuniform?CInCa
CsampleCofC80CTaekwondoCmatches,CthereCwereC45CmatchesCwhereCtheC redCuniformCwearerCwon.
1. WhatCisCtheCparameterCofCinterestCforCthisCstudy?
A. TheClong-runCproportionCofCTaekwondoCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwins
B. TheCproportionCofCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCinCaCsampleCofC80CTaek
wondoCmatches
C. WhetherCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCaCmatch
D.C 0.50
Ans:CA;CLO:C1.1-1;CDifficulty:CEasy;CType:CMC
2. WhatCisCtheCstatisticCforCthisCstudy?
A. TheClong-runCproportionCofCTaekwondoCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwins
B. TheCproportionCofCmatchesCinCwhichCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCinCaCsampleCofC80CTaek
wondoCmatches
C. WhetherCtheCredCuniformCwearerCwinsCaCmatch
D.C 0.50
Ans:CB;CLO:C1.1-1;CDifficulty:CEasy;CType:CMC
3. GivenCbelowCisCtheCsimulatedCdistributionCofCtheCnumberCofC―redCwins‖CthatCcouldChappenCbyCcha
nceCaloneCinCaCsampleCofC80Cmatches.CBasedConCthisCsimulation,CisCourCobservedCresultCstatistically
Csignificant?
A. Yes,CsinceC45CisClargerCthanC40.
B. Yes,CsinceCtheCheightCofCtheCdotplotCaboveC45CisCsmallerCthanCtheCheightCofCtheCdotpl
otCaboveC40.
C. No,CsinceC45CisCaCfairlyCtypicalCoutcomeCifCtheCcolorCofCtheCwinner‘sCuniformCwasCdeter
minedCbyCchanceCalone.
FORCINSTRUCTORCUSECONL
Y