Sam Houston State University
Examens, Klausuren oder Prüfungen an der Sam Houston State University. Suchst du Notizen von der/dem Sam Houston State University? Wir haben viele Zusammenfassungen und Notizen deiner Schule oder Universität.
-
322
-
2
-
26
All courses for Sam Houston State University
-
Anatomy 1
-
Anatomy and Physiology BIOL2404 14
-
ARTS 1303 ARTS1303 2
-
BANA 2372 Business Analysis BANA2372 1
-
BIO 246 1
-
CJ 361 CJ361 1
-
CJ 480 CJ480 1
-
COMS 1361 COMS1361 1
-
COMS 2331 COMS2331 21
-
COMS 2386 COMS2386 2
-
COMS 2390 COMS2390 4
-
COMS 3370 COMS3370 2
-
COMS 3372 COMS3372 16
-
Contemporary Moral Issues 2
-
Courts & Criminal Procedure 1
-
CRIJ 2394 CRIJ 2394 1
-
CRIJ 2394 02 1
-
CRIJ 4332 2
-
Economics 3
-
ENGL 1301 LISH1301 6
-
HIST 1302 1
-
HIST 3377 HIST3377 15
-
History 1301 HIST1301 12
-
Human sexuality 1
-
Introduction to Psychology 20
-
Legal Aspects of CJ CJ 2394 1
-
Managerial Econ 4
-
Managerial Economics 6
-
Managerial Economics Final Review 1
-
MATHS ECON 4357 1
-
MATHS PA1 1
-
Multicultural health HLTH2383 2
-
NUR 1251 NUR 1251 5
-
NURS 1251 1
-
NURS MISC Ch 31 Care of the Child with a Physical and Mental or Cognitive Disorder NURS MISC 2
-
NURSING 4357 1
-
Nursing econ 4357 1
-
PHIL 1301 PHIL1301 4
-
PSYC 3402 PSYC 3402 1
-
SPAN 2312 SPAN2312 1
-
Strategic Managment 2
-
United States History 39
-
Weather and Climate 1
Populäre Bücher Sam Houston State University
Joseph L. Locke, Ben Wright • ISBN 9781503606715
Aktuellste Notizen und Zusammenfassungen Sam Houston State University
Exam #5: Format & Review 
PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking Thomas J. Brommage Fall 2023 
 
The following concepts are important for the upcoming exam: 
 
1. Subjectivity: While art judgments are subjective, they are not entirely subjective. Beauty is not solely in the "eye of the beholder." 
 
2. Factual vs. Normative Judgments: Aesthetic and ethical judgments are normative, but they use different values. Ethical judgments involve moral blame and praise. 
 
3. Authority/Expertise and Art: Authorit...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 5 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking Exam Reviews 1,2,3,5• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 2 aus 5 Seiten
Exam #5: Format & Review 
PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking Thomas J. Brommage Fall 2023 
 
The following concepts are important for the upcoming exam: 
 
1. Subjectivity: While art judgments are subjective, they are not entirely subjective. Beauty is not solely in the "eye of the beholder." 
 
2. Factual vs. Normative Judgments: Aesthetic and ethical judgments are normative, but they use different values. Ethical judgments involve moral blame and praise. 
 
3. Authority/Expertise and Art: Authorit...
Unit #12: Art Inquiry 
This unit focuses on aesthetic judgments, privacy, subjectivity, artistic medium, interpretive judgments, meaning, and justifying interpretive judgments. Aesthetic judgments are evaluative or interpretive, expressing values like beauty, elegance, complexity, vision, and influence. While subjective impressions play a role, authority/expertise is not as important in aesthetics. Artistic medium varies, and different criteria are used for assessment. The exercise involves cons...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 2 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical thinking Units/chapter notes 3-12• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 1 aus 2 Seiten
Unit #12: Art Inquiry 
This unit focuses on aesthetic judgments, privacy, subjectivity, artistic medium, interpretive judgments, meaning, and justifying interpretive judgments. Aesthetic judgments are evaluative or interpretive, expressing values like beauty, elegance, complexity, vision, and influence. While subjective impressions play a role, authority/expertise is not as important in aesthetics. Artistic medium varies, and different criteria are used for assessment. The exercise involves cons...
Causal explanations are different from inductive arguments as they provide explanations rather than conclusions. There are two types of explanations: reason explanations and causal explanations. Reason explanations provide a purpose or goal, while causal explanations explain what caused something to happen. When evaluating causal explanations, it is important to consider the difference between causation and correlation. A fallacy of causal reasoning is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, which fails to d...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 2 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical thinking Units/chapter notes 3-12• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 1 aus 2 Seiten
Causal explanations are different from inductive arguments as they provide explanations rather than conclusions. There are two types of explanations: reason explanations and causal explanations. Reason explanations provide a purpose or goal, while causal explanations explain what caused something to happen. When evaluating causal explanations, it is important to consider the difference between causation and correlation. A fallacy of causal reasoning is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, which fails to d...
Arguments by Analogy are based on the idea that if a certain property or relation exists between two things (A and B), it will also exist between two other things (C and D) that share a similarity with A. Analogies are often expressed as A : B :: C : D. There are different types of analogical arguments, including Precedent Analogies that rely on similarities in circumstances, Causal Analogies that predict future events based on previous ones, and Illustrative Analogies that provide comparisons t...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 2 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical thinking Units/chapter notes 3-12• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 1 aus 2 Seiten
Arguments by Analogy are based on the idea that if a certain property or relation exists between two things (A and B), it will also exist between two other things (C and D) that share a similarity with A. Analogies are often expressed as A : B :: C : D. There are different types of analogical arguments, including Precedent Analogies that rely on similarities in circumstances, Causal Analogies that predict future events based on previous ones, and Illustrative Analogies that provide comparisons t...
There are four types of inductive arguments: Induction by Enumeration, Reductio Ad Absurdum, Statistical Induction, and Higher-level Induction. Induction by Enumeration argues from specific instances to a generalization. Reductio Ad Absurdum argues against a position by showing it leads to absurd outcomes. Statistical Induction infers generalizations based on the probability of a thing happening. Higher-level Induction uses more general inferences to overrule lower-level ones. Examples are provi...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 2 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical thinking Units/chapter notes 3-12• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 1 aus 2 Seiten
There are four types of inductive arguments: Induction by Enumeration, Reductio Ad Absurdum, Statistical Induction, and Higher-level Induction. Induction by Enumeration argues from specific instances to a generalization. Reductio Ad Absurdum argues against a position by showing it leads to absurd outcomes. Statistical Induction infers generalizations based on the probability of a thing happening. Higher-level Induction uses more general inferences to overrule lower-level ones. Examples are provi...
This text provides a review of concepts that may be encountered in Exam 2. It discusses the premise as a set of statements that justify the conclusion and the conclusion as the main point of the argument. Arguments are collections of statements used to justify a specific point, and sub-arguments can have multiple conclusions, serving as premises for larger arguments. The principle of charity suggests choosing the most favorable interpretation of an argument. Prima facie judgments are tentative a...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 4 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking Exam Reviews 1,2,3,5• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 1 aus 4 Seiten
This text provides a review of concepts that may be encountered in Exam 2. It discusses the premise as a set of statements that justify the conclusion and the conclusion as the main point of the argument. Arguments are collections of statements used to justify a specific point, and sub-arguments can have multiple conclusions, serving as premises for larger arguments. The principle of charity suggests choosing the most favorable interpretation of an argument. Prima facie judgments are tentative a...
Probative argument is an inductive argument evaluated using the principles of good reasoning, as it uses reasons rather than statistics. The strength of a probative argument can be easily determined as weak or not based on prima facie judgment, which is a preliminary judgement made with the knowledge that it is tentative and open to revision. Determining the strength typically requires a deeper investigation. Probative fallacies are common types of weak arguments that have considerable persuasiv...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 9 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical thinking Units/chapter notes 3-12• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 2 aus 9 Seiten
Probative argument is an inductive argument evaluated using the principles of good reasoning, as it uses reasons rather than statistics. The strength of a probative argument can be easily determined as weak or not based on prima facie judgment, which is a preliminary judgement made with the knowledge that it is tentative and open to revision. Determining the strength typically requires a deeper investigation. Probative fallacies are common types of weak arguments that have considerable persuasiv...
Arguments are collections of statements that are used to logically support a specific point. They consist of premises, which justify the conclusion, and the logical form that connects the premises to the conclusion. Premises and conclusions are statements that are declarative in grammatical form, factual, and in principle verifiable. 
 
Certain words or phrases, known as "tell words," can be used to identify whether a statement is a premise or a conclusion. Common tell words include "therefor...
- Paket-Deal
- Notizen
- • 5 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical thinking Units/chapter notes 3-12• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 2 aus 5 Seiten
Arguments are collections of statements that are used to logically support a specific point. They consist of premises, which justify the conclusion, and the logical form that connects the premises to the conclusion. Premises and conclusions are statements that are declarative in grammatical form, factual, and in principle verifiable. 
 
Certain words or phrases, known as "tell words," can be used to identify whether a statement is a premise or a conclusion. Common tell words include "therefor...
Exam #1 for PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking will include questions on various topics such as inquiry, critical evaluation, reasoned judgment, criteria, issues, reasons, comparative evaluation, justification, objections, public vs. private accessibility, widely-available vs. narrowly-available reasons, fallibility, fallacy, bias, counterexamples, context, state of practice, autonomy, confirmation bias, curiosity, open-mindedness, fair-mindedness, respect for reason, factual judgments, evaluative jud...
- Paket-Deal
- Zusammenfassung
- • 3 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
-
PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking Exam Reviews 1,2,3,5• von baileyharvey
Vorschau 1 aus 3 Seiten
Exam #1 for PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking will include questions on various topics such as inquiry, critical evaluation, reasoned judgment, criteria, issues, reasons, comparative evaluation, justification, objections, public vs. private accessibility, widely-available vs. narrowly-available reasons, fallibility, fallacy, bias, counterexamples, context, state of practice, autonomy, confirmation bias, curiosity, open-mindedness, fair-mindedness, respect for reason, factual judgments, evaluative jud...
Critical thinking refers to reflective judgment on what to believe or how to act. It involves recognizing good and bad reasoning and making rational judgments based on evidence. While our psychological and emotional side can influence our beliefs and actions, a rational decision is supported by reasons or evidence. Non-rational judgments include biases, commitment to existing beliefs despite new evidence, ignoring conflicting evidence, and relying on beliefs held by a group or psychological fact...
- Notizen
- • 5 Seiten 's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Vorschau 2 aus 5 Seiten
Critical thinking refers to reflective judgment on what to believe or how to act. It involves recognizing good and bad reasoning and making rational judgments based on evidence. While our psychological and emotional side can influence our beliefs and actions, a rational decision is supported by reasons or evidence. Non-rational judgments include biases, commitment to existing beliefs despite new evidence, ignoring conflicting evidence, and relying on beliefs held by a group or psychological fact...