Exercise 9 COMPREHENSIVE CORE EXERCISE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS CORRECT

Exercise 9 COMPREHENSIVE CORE EXERCISE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS CORRECT 1. Joseph Sorrentino, Plaintiff, versus Salvador A. Godinez, Defendant. This case was decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on January 23, 2015. This case is reported in volume 777, page 410, of Federal Reporter, Third Series.R Sorrentino v. Godinez, 777 F.3d 410 (7th Cir. 2015). Sorrentino v. Godinez, [Italicized] 2. On page 23 of your brief, you cited to the case in Problem 1. On page 26, you would like to refer to this case again, focusing your reader's attention on information beginning of page 415 and continuing on page 416. You have cited to other cases in the same reporter in the interim. [For your reference, the text of Problem 1 is: Joseph Sorrentino, Plaintiff, versus Salvador A. Godinez, Defendant. This case was decided in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on January 23, 2015. This case is reported in volume 777, page 410, of Federal Reporter, Third Series. Sorrentino, 777 F.3d at 415-16. 3. Section 11.011 of Vernon's Texas Natural Resources Code Annotated, published by West. You have located the code on Westlaw, which reports that it is current "through the 2019 Regular Session of the 86th Legislature." Tex. Nat. Res. Code Ann. § 11.011 (West, Westlaw through 2019 Reg. Sess. of 86th Leg.). 4. You wish to cite again to section 11.011 of Vernon's Texas Natural Resources Code Annotated in the next paragraph of your brief. You have cited two cases since your last reference to section 11.011. Nat. Res. § 11.011. 5. Elizabeth M. Terrible, Appellant, versus Joseph Frank Terrible, Respondent. This case was decided in the Supreme Court of Nevada on April 30, 1975. It is reported in volume 91, page 279, of Nevada Reports, and in volume 534, page 919, of Pacific Reporter, Second Series. You are citing this case in a brief to a Utah state court. Terrible v. Terrible, 534 P.2d 919 (Nev. 1975). 6. Section 3129(a) of title 7 of the current United States Code. 7 U.S.C. § 3129(a). Section 8, clause 8 of Article I of the Constitution of the United States. U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 8. One paragraph later, after citing to a federal statute, you wish to cite again to section 8, clause 8 of Article I of the Constitution of the United States. U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 8. Ernest E. Jones, Terrence A. Larsen, and Herbert Lotman versus Raymond W. Smith and Peter S. Strawbridge. This case was decided by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania on January 6, 1999. It is reported in volume 734, page 862, of Atlantic Reporter, Second Series. The citation follows a direct quotation of material found on page 865 of the opinion. Jones v. Smith, 734 A.2d 862, 865 (Pa. 1999). Paula Corbin Jones, Plaintiff, versus William Jefferson Clinton and Danny Ferguson, Defendants. This case was decided by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, on July 29, 1999. It appears in volume 57, page 719, of Federal Supplement, Second Series. Jones v. Clinton, 57 F. Supp. 2d 719 (E.D. Ark. 1999). In your brief, you cited to the case in Problem 10 in the immediately preceding sentence. In the next sentence, without any intervening cites, you would like to cite to that case again. However, this time you would like to direct your reader's attention to information found on page 723. Id. at 723. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure rule 20(a), dealing with permissive joinder of parties. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a). Section 4711 of title 16 of the Delaware Code Annotated published by LexisNexis. You have located the code on Lexis Advance, which reports that it is current "through the 82 Del. Laws, chs. 241, 245 and 246." Del. Code Ann. tit. 16, § 4711 (LEXIS through 82 Del. Laws, chs. 241, 245 and 246). The State of Georgia versus Ronnie Jack Beasley, Jr. This case was decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 30, 1998. It is reported in volume 269, page 620 of Georgia Reports and in volume 502, page 235, of South Eastern Reporter, Second Series. Assume that you are citing this case in a brief to the Supreme Court of Georgia and that this court requires parallel citations to both the state and the regional reporters. State v. Beasley, 269 Ga. 620, 502 S.E.2d 235 (1998). In a brief to the Supreme Court of Georgia, you have previously cited to the case in Problem 14. You wish to cite to this case again on the next page of your brief after several intervening cites to cases that are also in both Georgia Reports and South Eastern Reporter, Second Series. You wish to direct your reader's attention on information contained on page 623 of the state reporter and 239 of the regional reporter. [For your reference, the text of Problem 14 is: The State of Georgia versus Ronnie Jack Beasley, Jr. This case was decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 30, 1998. It is reported in volume 269, page 620 of Georgia Reports and in volume 502, page 235, of South Eastern Reporter, Second Series. Assume that you are citing this case in a brief to the Supreme Court of Georgia and that this court requires parallel citations to both the state and the regional reporters.] Beasley, 269 Ga. at 623, 502 S.E.2d at 239. Section 498.033(1)-(7) of West's Florida Statutes Annotated, published in 2013. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 498.033(1)-(7) (West 2013). In the next sentence, you wish to cite to just subsection (3) of the Florida statute. You have not included any intervening citations. [For your reference, the text of Problem 16 is: Section 498.033(1)-(7) of West's Florida Statutes Annotated, published in 2013.] Id. § 498.033(3). Oliver Brown, et al., versus The Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. This case was decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 17, 1954. It is reported in volume 347, page 483, of United States Reports; in volume 74, page 686, of Supreme Court Reporter; and in volume 98, page 873, of Lawyers' Edition, Second Series. Brown v. Bd. of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954). On page 68 of your brief, you cite to the case in Problem 18. On page 72 and in the same section of the brief, you would like to refer to this case again, focusing your reader's attention on information on page 485 of U.S., page 688 of S. Ct., and page 875 of L. Ed. 2d. You have been referring to this case throughout your brief as Brown. You have cited to other Supreme Court cases since the full citation to Brown. [For your reference, the text of Problem 18 is: Oliver Brown, et al., versus The Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. This case was decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 17, 1954. It is reported in volume 347, page 483, of United States Reports; in volume 74, page 686, of Supreme Court Reporter; and in volume 98, page 873, of Lawyers' Edition, Second Series.]