Feyerabend Study guides, Study notes & Summaries

Dit document bevat 40 MC oefenvragen met alle onderwerpen van psychologie en wetenschap voor de studie psychologie.

Science has two major components empirical observation and theory 3 multiple choice options Persistent observations that a currently accepted paradigm cannot explain is called? an anomaly 3 multiple choice options The ________ tends to assume that the human mind takes in information 1. rationalist 3 multiple choice options The _____ assumes that everything that occurs is a function of a finite number of causes determinist 3 multiple choice options If any conceivable observation suppo...

Thomas Kuhn - Defined normal science, established paradigms, wrote The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Karl Popper - concept of falsification Paul Feyerabend - Argued that science cannot be described by any standard set of rules, principles, or standards. In fact, he said, history shows that scientific progress occurs when individual scientists violate whatever rules, principles, or standards existed at the time. correspondence theory of truth - belief that truth corresponds to real...

PSYC 375 Quiz 1 Exam Questions With 100% Correct Answers According to the author of your text, which of the following would be (an) appropriate part(s) of the answer to the question, "is psychology a science?" a) some aspects of psychology are scientific b) some aspects of psychology are not yet scientific, but someday they may be c)some aspects of psychology will probably never be scientific d)all of these choices are appropriate answers - answerd)all of these choices are appropriate ...

UCLA Philosophy 8 Final Questions With 100% Correct Answers Explanans of an Explanation - answerThe fact(s) that explain the explanandum Explanandum of an Explanation - answerThe fact to be explained Covering-Law Model of Explanation (Deductive Nomological Model) - answerBy Carl Hempel and Paul Oppenheim To explain phenomena P is to derive it in terms of a logical deductive argument Four features required of an explanation in the Covering-Law Model - answer1. An explanation is a type of ...

UCLA Philosophy 8 Final Questions With 100% Correct Answers Explanans of an Explanation - answerThe fact(s) that explain the explanandum Explanandum of an Explanation - answerThe fact to be explained Covering-Law Model of Explanation (Deductive Nomological Model) - answerBy Carl Hempel and Paul Oppenheim To explain phenomena P is to derive it in terms of a logical deductive argument Four features required of an explanation in the Covering-Law Model - answer1. An explanation is a type of ...

Chapter 1 – Historical Studies: Some Issues A History of Psychology: Ideas and Context (4th edition) D. Brett King, Wayne Viney, and William Douglas Woody This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by law: • any public performance or display, including transmission of any image over a network; • preparation of any derivative work, including the extraction, in whole or in part, of any images; • any rental, lease, or lendin...

Zeitgeist means: - Answer- A spirit of the times Correlational laws allow for prediction, but causal laws permit prediction and __________: - Answer- control The belief that human behavior is determined but the causes of behavior cannot be accurately measured is most compatible with: - Answer- Heisenberg's uncertainty principle According to Popper, the theories of Freud and Adler cannot be considered scientific because they: - Answer- make postictions rather than predictions A scien...

In deze samenvatting over wetenschapsfilosofie uit het boek ‘Durf te denken!’ komt onder andere Aristoteles zijn theologisch wereldbeeld aan bod. Verder wordt er ingegaan op Francis Bacon en zijn idolen. Ook kun je lezen over het logisch positivisme van de Wiener Kreis en de falsificatie theorie van Karl Popper. Daarnaast gaat het over de verschillende onderzoeksmethoden, denk hierbij aan de empirische cyclus, inductie en deductie en prescriptieve en descriptieve wetenschapsfilosofie. Wat de...

Eerst worden er een paar vragen besproken. Daarna worden de hoofdstukken van Chalmers besproken. Verder worden de volgende filosofen besproken: Popper, Labaree, Hostetler, Kuhn, Lakatos, Feyerabend, Knorr-Cetina, Hacking, R. Collins, Smith, Haraway, Hill Collins, Fricker, Elgin Als laatste wordt er nog een overzicht gegeven hoe je het beste de vragen op het tentamen kan beantwoorden.