100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Criminology Unit 3 - AC3.2 Drawing conclusions from cases

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
4
Uploaded on
28-08-2024
Written in
2022/2023

This is a summary note of Ac3.2, Drawing conclusions from cases. These notes helped me receive an A* overall; friends and family who borrowed these notes have received high grades. It is quickly allied with titles and detailed explanations that are easy to understand. The notes were written through revision books, teacher notes, and my research. It's full of case studies, hopefully giving you that advantage over other exam students.

Show more Read less








Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Summarized whole book?
Yes
Uploaded on
August 28, 2024
Number of pages
4
Written in
2022/2023
Type
Summary

Content preview

AC3.2 – Drawing conclusions from cases

Conclusion Explanation Case study What happened? Why is it that conclusion?
Unsafe Lindy  Australia  The Northern Territory
verdict Overturned Chamberlain  Lindy police could not
verdict due camping believe the corner's
to the jury with family inquest about a Dingo
basing their  9month being the suspect. This
verdict on daughter was overruled and not
incorrect, goes missing admitted to the jury
missed out  Lindy claims during the trial.
or biased a dingo took  Lindy was questioned
evidence her baby on the garments her
presented in  Authorities daughter was wearing.
court. did not Specific and precise
believe her questions that were
 Lindy was asked in a leading way
sentenced which confused Lindy.
This was used against
her, Lindy thought she
was just giving her
testimony.
 Much was made of the
Chamberlains' Seventh-
day Adventist religion,
including false
allegations that the
church was actually a
cult that killed infants
as part of bizarre
religious ceremonies.
The jury was made up
on people who did not
agree with religion.

Unjust A unfair and Amanda  Italy  Socos failed to wear
verdict bias trial Knox  Amanda the proper ppe when
foreign entering the crime
exchange scene
student  Amanda was coerced
returned and slapped during
home to find interviews with police
blood in asking her “who is it?”
bathroom thought she was
and her protecting someone
friend,  requested a lawyer
Meredith’s but denied, was not
door locked allowed access to
 Arrested for food, water, or the
bathroom. Ficarra and
the murder
policewoman Lorena
of meridith Zugarini testified the
nov 2nd 2007
£7.24
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
isabellajane12

Also available in package deal

Thumbnail
Package deal
Criminology Unit 3 - AC3.1 and AC3.2
-
2 2024
£ 14.58 More info

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
isabellajane12 Nottingham Trent University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
1 year
Number of followers
0
Documents
13
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions