Betty Burns (Hem/ONC) EXPERT FEEDBACK ANSWERS CC: Self-
detected breast lump
[Document subtitle]
[DATE]
[COMPANY NAME]
[Company address]
, Betty Burns
Chief complaint:
Self-detected breast lump
Below are the instructions for playing this DDx. case and your grading rubric: Note you will be allowed to
push the Interview Progress Button and receive feedback on your history questions 10 times.
a) % required history questions you asked (30% of grade)
b) % required physical exam performed (30% of grade)
c) differential diagnoses list (15%)
d) ranking differential diagnosis list (10%)
e) laboratory tests ordered (15%)
Notice that getting the correct final diagnosis is not part of the graded case. This is because if you do
well in each of the other parts, you WILL get the correct diagnosis. The software platform is designed
to help you become proficient in the diagnostic reasoning process (all the steps prior to the final
diagnosis), so you can apply this process in the real clinic setting. Key to minimizing medical errors
is the clinical consideration of a broad differential diagnosis list and the selection of tests to either
“rule in” or “rule out” these diagnoses.
**** HELPFUL HINTS ****
The Avatars and cases in the IHP case library are based on “real patients”. If the Avatar provides
confusing information, this is intentional as we often what we find real patients provide incongruent
information. For example, the Avatar may use the term “rash” for skin lesions that are not by medical
definition a rash---just like real patients. Avatars may refuse to answer questions, just like real
patients. Phrasing of questions IS important. Asking a “similar” question that is less specific may not
be scored correct if it does not provide the clarity of information needed to narrow the differential. All
of these small nuances in the case design were intentional and replicate the challenges you will face
with real patients in a clinical setting. My recommendation is to pretend this is a real clinical patient
encounter and select a time so you can enjoy the process and not feel pressured for time.
Remember, you are not scored on whether you get the diagnosis correct, but rather have you
mastered the process. Mastery of the process will help you avoid making diagnostic errors throughout
your clinical career.
Detailed Instructions Below:
1. Take the patient's history.
Decide of this is a patient that can be treated as an outpatient; focused case – fewer
history questions needed versus a comprehensive case where all components of a history.
Document the chief complaint
, Document any abnormal history or complaints on your problem list
The Interview Progress Button can be used up to 10 times on the practice cases only to
give you feedback on how close you are to asking all the authors “required questions”.
2. Proceed to perform a PHYSICAL EXAM.
Assess vital signs and perform the examination appropriate for the type of case identified by
the above history. Remember the comprehensive cases require a comprehensive physical.
Document abnormal findings in your problem list.
3. Be sure to complete the problem list exercise.
The directions will tell you how many items should be chosen. DO NOT exceed that
number or your score will be zero.
4. Write a concise problem statement.
Start with a demographic description of your patient and the chief complaint and MSAP. Try
to keep your problem statement below 100 words. Although this will not count towards your final case
score, it will allow you to practice learning to communicate patient information in a complete and
concise fashion.
5. Finalize your differential diagnosis list.
You may start your differential diagnosis during the history taking section, but after
completing the problem statement, reflect and finalize your differential diagnosis list. Remember, this
part of the case will be scored on how comprehensive this list is. You will not lose points for having
too many, points are lost only if you have too few. The average list contains 5 diagnoses.
6. Order Tests
Order each test and link it to a diagnosis. Some tests are ordered to “rule in” a diagnosis
while others are ordered to “rule out” a diagnosis.
DO NOT try to scam the system by just clicking on everything. The software tracks not only what is
done, but also keeps track of the order of completion. Clicking on the first opening question and then
just going down the list of questions in the history is viewed as “scamming” the system and can result
in a score of ZERO---same principle applies to each section. The time for completion of the case, as
well as time spent in each section of the case is also recorded. This data has been shown to
correlate with case performance. Very short times have lower scores as do very long times. The
former is most likely due to lack of effort while the latter may be because the user is receiving
multiple interruptions. The low score then most likely reflects “lack of continuity” of thought. Try to set
aside enough time to complete the case in its entirety in a single sitting.
This software is aimed at trying to help assess your critical thinking and diagnostic reasoning skills
with patients similar to those you will be seeing in the clinical setting. It is extremely important for you
to take these cases seriously as they will be used to determine how appropriate your interactions are
with patients and if your clinical decision making skills are appropriate for this level in the program.
HISTORY
You asked 66 questions. 10 (15%) were key questions suggested by the expert case author.
You asked an additional 56 questions (85%).
Mi s si n g
Oops. You didn't ask all important questions suggested by the expert author for this case. You missed
asking 11 of the 21 key questions. (Note: Sometimes there is more than one way to get similar
detected breast lump
[Document subtitle]
[DATE]
[COMPANY NAME]
[Company address]
, Betty Burns
Chief complaint:
Self-detected breast lump
Below are the instructions for playing this DDx. case and your grading rubric: Note you will be allowed to
push the Interview Progress Button and receive feedback on your history questions 10 times.
a) % required history questions you asked (30% of grade)
b) % required physical exam performed (30% of grade)
c) differential diagnoses list (15%)
d) ranking differential diagnosis list (10%)
e) laboratory tests ordered (15%)
Notice that getting the correct final diagnosis is not part of the graded case. This is because if you do
well in each of the other parts, you WILL get the correct diagnosis. The software platform is designed
to help you become proficient in the diagnostic reasoning process (all the steps prior to the final
diagnosis), so you can apply this process in the real clinic setting. Key to minimizing medical errors
is the clinical consideration of a broad differential diagnosis list and the selection of tests to either
“rule in” or “rule out” these diagnoses.
**** HELPFUL HINTS ****
The Avatars and cases in the IHP case library are based on “real patients”. If the Avatar provides
confusing information, this is intentional as we often what we find real patients provide incongruent
information. For example, the Avatar may use the term “rash” for skin lesions that are not by medical
definition a rash---just like real patients. Avatars may refuse to answer questions, just like real
patients. Phrasing of questions IS important. Asking a “similar” question that is less specific may not
be scored correct if it does not provide the clarity of information needed to narrow the differential. All
of these small nuances in the case design were intentional and replicate the challenges you will face
with real patients in a clinical setting. My recommendation is to pretend this is a real clinical patient
encounter and select a time so you can enjoy the process and not feel pressured for time.
Remember, you are not scored on whether you get the diagnosis correct, but rather have you
mastered the process. Mastery of the process will help you avoid making diagnostic errors throughout
your clinical career.
Detailed Instructions Below:
1. Take the patient's history.
Decide of this is a patient that can be treated as an outpatient; focused case – fewer
history questions needed versus a comprehensive case where all components of a history.
Document the chief complaint
, Document any abnormal history or complaints on your problem list
The Interview Progress Button can be used up to 10 times on the practice cases only to
give you feedback on how close you are to asking all the authors “required questions”.
2. Proceed to perform a PHYSICAL EXAM.
Assess vital signs and perform the examination appropriate for the type of case identified by
the above history. Remember the comprehensive cases require a comprehensive physical.
Document abnormal findings in your problem list.
3. Be sure to complete the problem list exercise.
The directions will tell you how many items should be chosen. DO NOT exceed that
number or your score will be zero.
4. Write a concise problem statement.
Start with a demographic description of your patient and the chief complaint and MSAP. Try
to keep your problem statement below 100 words. Although this will not count towards your final case
score, it will allow you to practice learning to communicate patient information in a complete and
concise fashion.
5. Finalize your differential diagnosis list.
You may start your differential diagnosis during the history taking section, but after
completing the problem statement, reflect and finalize your differential diagnosis list. Remember, this
part of the case will be scored on how comprehensive this list is. You will not lose points for having
too many, points are lost only if you have too few. The average list contains 5 diagnoses.
6. Order Tests
Order each test and link it to a diagnosis. Some tests are ordered to “rule in” a diagnosis
while others are ordered to “rule out” a diagnosis.
DO NOT try to scam the system by just clicking on everything. The software tracks not only what is
done, but also keeps track of the order of completion. Clicking on the first opening question and then
just going down the list of questions in the history is viewed as “scamming” the system and can result
in a score of ZERO---same principle applies to each section. The time for completion of the case, as
well as time spent in each section of the case is also recorded. This data has been shown to
correlate with case performance. Very short times have lower scores as do very long times. The
former is most likely due to lack of effort while the latter may be because the user is receiving
multiple interruptions. The low score then most likely reflects “lack of continuity” of thought. Try to set
aside enough time to complete the case in its entirety in a single sitting.
This software is aimed at trying to help assess your critical thinking and diagnostic reasoning skills
with patients similar to those you will be seeing in the clinical setting. It is extremely important for you
to take these cases seriously as they will be used to determine how appropriate your interactions are
with patients and if your clinical decision making skills are appropriate for this level in the program.
HISTORY
You asked 66 questions. 10 (15%) were key questions suggested by the expert case author.
You asked an additional 56 questions (85%).
Mi s si n g
Oops. You didn't ask all important questions suggested by the expert author for this case. You missed
asking 11 of the 21 key questions. (Note: Sometimes there is more than one way to get similar
