Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Summary Pressure Group Notes

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
2
Uploaded on
14-03-2017
Written in
2015/2016

Notes on Pressure Groups in the form of essay plans. Applicable for the entire section. These are drawn from past paper questions drawn from the past 6 years of exams. Abbreviated, but clear to understand.

Content preview

Pressure Groups
What Determines Whether Pressure Groups will be Successful?

Insider/outsider Insiders have support of govt. May be relied upon to implement
policy (RSPB with conservation), so have huge influence, and a
constant channel with ministers. - they have ECONOMIC
LEVERAGE.
However, BMA’s strike action, typical to those of outsiders, has
gained far more effective response from govt.

Aims/Methods/Cou Whilst they can always raise attention to an issue, achieving their
ntervailing groups aims means that it needs to be achievable - Plane Stupid won’t (end
worldwide airplane use), but SNCG’s (Save the Huntingdon
Newchurch Guinea Pigs) aim of shutting down a farm supplying lab
animals did, despite using the often ineffective strategy of terrorism.
If public supports it, far more likely to succeed - Prison Reform
Society unlikely to succeed as not on Anthony Downs’ issue
attention cycle:




Strong groups against it can scupper their chances - ASH vs Forest,
public anti-smoking sentiment.
Ability to use social media, internet campaign - 38 degrees has 2.4
million members, led very successful e-petition campaigns,
including stopping cambridge library top floor shutting down.

Legitimacy/particip With enough support, and representing enough of their group (eg.
ation NFU and 80% of farmers), they seem far more potent to govt.
Badger culling pushed through despite resistance from
environmental groups. However Countryside alliance, whose
250,000 members represent a tiny fraction of total country people
and has been inneffective

Resources/celebrit More resources, better organised, able to do more things (fund
y judicial reviews, Brussels offices, Newspaper ads). - NO to AV side
endorsement/leade spent 50% more, won.
rship Celebrity endorsement allows it to be raised on Downs’ issue
attention cycle, gives vocal advocate - Lumley, Ghurka Justice;

Document information

Uploaded on
March 14, 2017
Number of pages
2
Written in
2015/2016
Type
SUMMARY
£3.99
Get access to the full document:

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
manu142

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
manu142 OCR
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
1
Member since
9 year
Number of followers
1
Documents
7
Last sold
6 year ago

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Trending documents

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions