Experiments Right answerism, problems of validity, may lie/ give dishonest
Laboratory answers
- researcher manipulates variables Impose researchers meaning through word choice/ options in
- Theoretical closed questions
Can establish cause and effect relationships - Practical
Reliable, can be replicated Quick and cheap, large sample population
Detached method Easily generalised
Positivists Don’t need to train/ recruit loads of researchers
Reduced representativeness as small scale Easy to quantify
Hawthorne effect, artificial settings alter behaviour Data tends to be limited or superficial
Can't explain behaviour with cause and effect as humans have Cannot be sure who answered with postal forms
free will Low response rate, few answer and return forms
- Practical Inflexible, can't ask follow up questions
Impossible to identify and control all influencing variables - Ethical
Hard to investigate large scale social issues No obligation for ppts to answer questions
- Ethics Gain informed consent by ppt answering questions
Lack of informed consent Structured interviews
Deception, used to avoid demand characteristics - Theoretical
Harm e.g. Milgram Reliable, can be standardised and controlled
Field experiments Invalid, produce false picture, restrict answers, little freedom to
- Natural surroundings, those involved are often unaware clarify meanings
- Theoretical Social interaction so risk of influence
Valid as no influencing variables Researcher has already decided what’s important,, inflexible
- Ethical questions
Deception - Practical
Lack of informed consent, would have to get consent from Trainings is inexpensive
parents as may enforce negative stereotypes Can cover large numbers of people
Questionnaires Easily quantified
- Theoretical Higher response rate
Reliable, close ended can be repeated to get same findings - Ethical
Online/ postal have no researcher influence Imbalance of power
Allows for comparisons Feminists say they treat women as subordinates/ isolated
Hypothesis testing, can find cause and effect individuals rather than in the context of oppression
Objective method, minimal involvement with researcher Unstructured interviews
Representative - Theoretical
Don’t produce fully valid picture as only a snapshot Unreliable, can't be standardised
Detachment, can't gain valid picture, don’t know how ppt Not representative as too time consuming to do large groups
interpreted question Give valid data as can investigate what is important to ppt
Laboratory answers
- researcher manipulates variables Impose researchers meaning through word choice/ options in
- Theoretical closed questions
Can establish cause and effect relationships - Practical
Reliable, can be replicated Quick and cheap, large sample population
Detached method Easily generalised
Positivists Don’t need to train/ recruit loads of researchers
Reduced representativeness as small scale Easy to quantify
Hawthorne effect, artificial settings alter behaviour Data tends to be limited or superficial
Can't explain behaviour with cause and effect as humans have Cannot be sure who answered with postal forms
free will Low response rate, few answer and return forms
- Practical Inflexible, can't ask follow up questions
Impossible to identify and control all influencing variables - Ethical
Hard to investigate large scale social issues No obligation for ppts to answer questions
- Ethics Gain informed consent by ppt answering questions
Lack of informed consent Structured interviews
Deception, used to avoid demand characteristics - Theoretical
Harm e.g. Milgram Reliable, can be standardised and controlled
Field experiments Invalid, produce false picture, restrict answers, little freedom to
- Natural surroundings, those involved are often unaware clarify meanings
- Theoretical Social interaction so risk of influence
Valid as no influencing variables Researcher has already decided what’s important,, inflexible
- Ethical questions
Deception - Practical
Lack of informed consent, would have to get consent from Trainings is inexpensive
parents as may enforce negative stereotypes Can cover large numbers of people
Questionnaires Easily quantified
- Theoretical Higher response rate
Reliable, close ended can be repeated to get same findings - Ethical
Online/ postal have no researcher influence Imbalance of power
Allows for comparisons Feminists say they treat women as subordinates/ isolated
Hypothesis testing, can find cause and effect individuals rather than in the context of oppression
Objective method, minimal involvement with researcher Unstructured interviews
Representative - Theoretical
Don’t produce fully valid picture as only a snapshot Unreliable, can't be standardised
Detachment, can't gain valid picture, don’t know how ppt Not representative as too time consuming to do large groups
interpreted question Give valid data as can investigate what is important to ppt