100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Summary

Résumé French A-Level Independent Research Powerpoint: May 1968 causes and consequences (70 pages!!)

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
70
Uploaded on
04-06-2022
Written in
2021/2022

This resource is perfect for those who want to save time on researching for their IRP for French A-Level or, alternatively, to serve as an example of a high-level research project. Title (taken from the French A-Level Specification) : May 1968 the causes and the consequences. Included in the document: 1. Powerpoint Presentation full of top quality research, sources and ideas (included answers to possible follow up questions). 2. A written 2-minute presentation on May 1968. 3. Extra answers for the wider discussion on the following themes: 1. Context : Les Trentes Glorieuses et le repise économique, Une société en pleine mutation et Les oubliés de la croissance économique. 2. Acteurs Principaux: Charles de Gaulle, homme d’état français, Georges Pompidou, homme d’état français et Daniel Cohn-Bendit, homme politique allemand. 3. Le Catalyseur: L’université de Nanterre et 'Dany le rouge' (Daniel Cohn-Bendit). 4. Les Causes: L'usure du pouvoir, L'insatisfaction estudiantine, La politique à l’université, Le défi à la hiérarchie et Les ouvriers. 5. Le Mouvement de Mai 1968 (for background knowledge) : Le mouvement de 22 mars, La première nuit des barricades, Les ouvriers entrent en grève, Une France paralysée, Les accords de Grenelle. 6. La Crise: La Crise Étudiante, La Crise Sociale et La Crise Politique. 7. Les Conséquences: Un président de plus en plus décrié, Une société bouleversée, Les accords de Grenelle et une victoire pour les ouvriers, Les étudiants et la loi Edgard Faure et La place de l’homme dans la société de consommation (une contradiction problématique). 8. Les Revendications ailleurs dans le monde francophone: Belgique, Sénégal et Tunisie. 9. L'héritage de Mai 1968. 10. Les Sources : Le journal de Mavis Gallant, Milou en Mai par Louis Malle, Jean-Paul Sartre sur la violence et Emmanuel Macron (Un mai 1968 en 2018?) 11. Pourquoi Mai 1968? Ce qui me frappe le plus... Thank you very much for your interest in this resource. It took me the course of two years to produce and collate the information, so I hope that it will be greatly helpful to you.

Show more Read less











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Document information

Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
Unknown
Uploaded on
June 4, 2022
Number of pages
70
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Summary

Content preview

Digital Workbook




IRP
Individual Research Project

,What is the Individual Research Project?

The IRP is one element of the speaking component of the A-level examinations (paper 3)


• You must choose a subject or a key question which interests you and which relates to a
country or countries where the target language is spoken.

• You must select relevant information in the target language from a range of sources,
including the Internet.

• The aim of the IRP is to develop research skills.

• You need to show your ability to initiate and conduct individual research by analysing and
summarising your findings, in order to present and discuss them in the A-level speaking
assessment.


How it is assessed:

• This element of the speaking examination is worth 35 marks (out of 60).

• You must start with a 2 minutes presentation.

• The follow-up discussion will last 9-10 minutes.

, Assessment Criteria for the IRP
Research-based topic presentation: AO4 (5 marks)




Mark Descriptors


5 Thorough knowledge and understanding of the area of study are evident in the presentation.



4 Good knowledge and understanding of the area of study are evident in the presentation.


3 Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the area of study are evident in the
presentation.


2 Limited knowledge and understanding of the area of study are evident in the presentation.


1 Very limited knowledge and understanding of the area of study are evident in the
presentation.


0 Nothing in the presentation is worthy of a mark.




Notes:

Thorough knowledge: A presentation that demonstrates that you have fully understood
and assimilated research-based knowledge through the development, in the time available, of
key findings.

Good knowledge: A presentation that demonstrates that you have mostly understood and
assimilated research-based knowledge through the development, in the time available, of key
findings.

Reasonable knowledge: A presentation that demonstrates that you have understood and
assimilated some research-based knowledge through the development, in the time available,
of key findings.

Limited knowledge: A brief outline of key findings with little development and showing
little understanding and assimilation of research-based knowledge.

Very limited knowledge: The briefest outline of key findings with very little development
and
showing very little understanding and assimilation of research-based knowledge.

, Assessment Criteria for the IRP
Research-based topic discussion: AO1 (10 marks)



Mark Descriptors

9-10 Delivery is fluent throughout. The ideas and opinions expressed are nearly always
developed, independently of prompts. Students engage very well in the discussion and give
an appropriate response to nearly all questions.

7-8 Delivery is mainly fluent. The ideas and opinions expressed are mostly developed,
independently of prompts. Students engage well in the discussion and give an appropriate
response to most questions.

5-6 Delivery is sometimes fluent. The ideas and opinions expressed are sometimes developed,
independently of prompts. Students engage reasonably well in the discussion and give an
appropriate response to some questions.

3-4 Delivery is occasionally fluent. The ideas and opinions expressed are occasionally
developed, independently of prompts. Students engage to a limited extent in the discussion
and give an appropriate response to a few questions.

1-2 Delivery is rarely fluent. The ideas and opinions expressed are rarely developed,
independently of prompts. Students engage to a very limited extent in the discussion and
give an appropriate response to very few questions.

0 Nothing in the performance is worthy of a mark.




Research-based topic discussion: AO3 (10 marks)


Mark Descriptors


9-10 A wide range of vocabulary and complex language and a good knowledge of appropriate
idiom are demonstrated. Highly accurate application of grammar with occasional minor
errors. Pronunciation and intonation are very good.

7-8 A good range of vocabulary and complex language and some knowledge of appropriate
idiom are demonstrated. Mostly accurate application of grammar with some minor errors.
Pronunciation and intonation are good.

5-6 Some variety of vocabulary and complex language is demonstrated. Accurate application of
grammar is uneven. Pronunciation and intonation are fairly good.

3-4 Little variety of vocabulary and structures is demonstrated. Accurate application of
grammar is limited. Pronunciation and intonation are mostly intelligible.

1-2 Very little variety of vocabulary and structures is demonstrated. Accurate application of
grammar is very limited. Pronunciation and intonation are poor.

0 Nothing in the performance is worthy of a mark.

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
alevelsmadeeasyrevision Oxford University
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
27
Member since
5 year
Number of followers
26
Documents
16
Last sold
4 weeks ago
A-Level Revision Made Easy

The shop is full of high level resources, produced by a Oxford University History Undergraduate, targeting top grades in English Literature, History and French. Resources have been thoroughly researched in order to contain optimum detail and understanding. Please email me at for further information on resources.

3.8

10 reviews

5
3
4
5
3
0
2
1
1
1

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions