International Advanced Level
Law
Paper 2 Mark Scheme (Results)
Thursday 27 October 2016 – Afternoon Paper Reference October 2016
Time: 3 hours YLA0/02
You must have:
Answer book (AB16)
Pearson Edexcel International
Advanced Level in Law (YLA0)
Instructions Paper 2
• number,
In the boxes on the answer book, write your centre number, candidate
your surname and initials, the paper reference (YLA0/02)
and your signature.
• This paper is divided into FIVE sections (A–E). Choose TWO of these sections
and answer any TWO questions from each – FOUR questions in total.
• Your answers must be fully supported with appropriate legal authority
and examples.
• Answer your questions in the answer book.
• Indicate which questions you are answering, in the boxes on the front page
of the answer book AND in the left-hand margin of the answer space.
• Do not use pencil. Use blue or black ink.
Information
• AllThequestions carry equal marks.
• This total mark for this paper is 100.
• paper has 20 questions. Any blank pages are indicated.
Advice
• Write your answers neatly and in good English.
Turn over
P51042A
Pearson Education Ltd.
1/1/1/1
*P51042A*
, Answer any FOUR questions chosen from TWO sections.
Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications
Candidates must answer TWO, and only TWO, questions from each section chosen.
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body.
SECTION A: The Market We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational
1 A lost his pet dog when he was taking him for a walk in the country. He was very and specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications
anxious to find the dog, so the next day he placed a notice in a shop window websites at or . Alternatively, you can get in touch
in a village close to where the dog disappeared. The notice, which contained a with us using the details on our contact us page at .
photograph of the dog and A’s email address, stated:
“Missing since May 1st: Small black spaniel with white paws. £100 reward for the person
who finds him. Please contact the owner by email.”
B, aged 15, found a dog similar to the dog in the photograph wandering in the
woods. He did not have access to his computer, so he left his phone number with C,
the owner of the shop, asking him to tell A to contact him by phone.
C emailed A, and informed him that B had found the dog. Meanwhile, when B
returned to the place where he had tied up the dog outside the shop, the animal had
disappeared. Two days later, D, a teacher who had taken the dog from outside the
shop, emailed A to inform him that he had found the dog, and that he was looking
after him until A collected him.
Both B and D claimed the reward, and A refused to pay either of them.
Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere
Consider whether B or D is legally entitled to the reward and explain the legal rules
that govern this matter. Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone
progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds
(Total for Question 1 = 25 marks) of people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150
years, and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international
reputation for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through
innovation in education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at:
October 2016
Publications Code YLA0 02 1610 MS
All the material in this publication is
Pearson Education Ltd 2016
2
P51042A
, 2 E booked a week’s holiday on the internet for himself and his wife, F, in a seaside
hotel. The online information about the hotel stated:
“Luxurious bedrooms. Wonderful indoor swimming pool. Peaceful surroundings. No
children allowed.”
E and F drove to the hotel and parked in the hotel car park. A sign at the entrance to General Marking Guidance
the car park stated:
“£50 a week for hotel guests. Terms and conditions apply.” All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must
mark the first candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the last.
E drove into the car park and took a ticket from a machine inside the parking area,
Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be
but did not examine it. The following statement appeared on the back of the ticket:
rewarded for what they have shown they can do rather than penalised for
“The hotel does not accept responsibility for damage to cars or injury to people using this omissions.
car park.” Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme not according to
their perception of where the grade boundaries may lie.
E and F were shown to their bedroom, which was decorated to a high standard, but There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark scheme
unfortunately there were tiny biting insects in the bed, and both E and F developed should be used appropriately.
irritating skin rashes after the first night. The bathroom also gave them problems
All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded.
as the hotel drains were blocked for the first two days of their stay, causing an Examiners should always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer
unpleasant smell. The same smell affected the swimming pool so they did not matches the mark scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to award
swim there. zero marks if the candidate’s response is not worthy of credit according to
the mark scheme.
Although no children were staying at the hotel there was a very noisy nightclub next
Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the
door, and the students who visited it every night kept E and F awake until 2.00 am.
principles by which marks will be awarded and exemplification may be
E and F complained frequently about these problems. The hotel manager apologised, limited.
but no offer of compensation was made. When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark
scheme to a candidate’s response, the team leader must be consulted.
After they checked out of the hotel and returned to their car, E and F noticed that it Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate has replaced
had been damaged, but the hotel denied any responsibility, relying on the notice on it with an alternative response.
the car park ticket.
Some weeks later, E and F realised that they had biting insects in their bed at home,
and were advised by an expert that the insects must have been carried on their skin
and clothes from their bed in the hotel. They had to pay a specialist firm £2,000, to
get rid of the insects and they both had unpleasant skin rashes for six months.
Consider whether E and F have legal remedies against the hotel. Explain how their
complaints might be resolved without using the courts.
(Total for Question 2 = 25 marks)
3
P51042A
Turn over