WGU D265 Task 1: Critical Thinking
Case Study | Latest 2025/2026 Update
Complete Guide with Solutions and
Templates
This comprehensive guide covers everything you need for the WGU
D265 Task 1: Critical Thinking Case Study. It includes the official
template structure, multiple case study examples with complete
solutions, and detailed analysis of how to identify premises,
conclusions, argument types, fallacies, and biases to achieve a
passing score.
Task Overview
The purpose of this task is to demonstrate your ability to think
critically by:
1. Analyzing a given scenario or information.
2. Evaluating evidence and assumptions.
3. Making reasoned conclusions.
4. Reflecting on your own reasoning process.
Official D265 Task 1 Template
Choose one of the case studies from the Case Study list in Supporting
Documents. Read the case study carefully. Then, complete the
,evaluation by filling out the template below. No more than 30% of your
written response can match other sources.
Template Structure
Section Requirement
Premise(s) and Provide the labeled
Conclusion premise(s) and
conclusion of an
argument from your
selected case study
Deductive/Inductive Describe whether
the argument is
deductive or
inductive
Validity/Strength For deductive:
explain valid/invalid.
For inductive:
explain strong/weak
Map Provide a map of the
argument with
numbered circles
and arrows
Reliability Describe whether
the identified source
, of information is
reliable
Bias Describe the bias
present and how it
impacts the
argument
Fallacy Name at least one
fallacy used within
the case study
Sources Provide references
for any sources
beyond the case
study
Case Study Example #1: Healthcare Case –
Dementia Treatment
Scenario: Daniel argues that nurses should use a sound therapy
device on a dementia patient based on online caregiver claims,
observing his grandmother's mental sharpness after classical music,
and an influencer's endorsement.
Complete Solution
Premise(s) and Conclusion
Case Study | Latest 2025/2026 Update
Complete Guide with Solutions and
Templates
This comprehensive guide covers everything you need for the WGU
D265 Task 1: Critical Thinking Case Study. It includes the official
template structure, multiple case study examples with complete
solutions, and detailed analysis of how to identify premises,
conclusions, argument types, fallacies, and biases to achieve a
passing score.
Task Overview
The purpose of this task is to demonstrate your ability to think
critically by:
1. Analyzing a given scenario or information.
2. Evaluating evidence and assumptions.
3. Making reasoned conclusions.
4. Reflecting on your own reasoning process.
Official D265 Task 1 Template
Choose one of the case studies from the Case Study list in Supporting
Documents. Read the case study carefully. Then, complete the
,evaluation by filling out the template below. No more than 30% of your
written response can match other sources.
Template Structure
Section Requirement
Premise(s) and Provide the labeled
Conclusion premise(s) and
conclusion of an
argument from your
selected case study
Deductive/Inductive Describe whether
the argument is
deductive or
inductive
Validity/Strength For deductive:
explain valid/invalid.
For inductive:
explain strong/weak
Map Provide a map of the
argument with
numbered circles
and arrows
Reliability Describe whether
the identified source
, of information is
reliable
Bias Describe the bias
present and how it
impacts the
argument
Fallacy Name at least one
fallacy used within
the case study
Sources Provide references
for any sources
beyond the case
study
Case Study Example #1: Healthcare Case –
Dementia Treatment
Scenario: Daniel argues that nurses should use a sound therapy
device on a dementia patient based on online caregiver claims,
observing his grandmother's mental sharpness after classical music,
and an influencer's endorsement.
Complete Solution
Premise(s) and Conclusion
