Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 1 pages
Summary

Judicial Precedent Summary and Evaluation

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 1 pages

This resource uses a clear, structured mind map format to break down judicial precedent and its key principles in an easy to understand way. The resource includes multiple stages to support active recall: - Complete mind map – clearly outlines and explains all key information and principles. - Partially completed mind map – key terms are removed to test your ability to recall important information. - Blank mind map – allows you to independently recreate the content from memory. The information is organised in a way that mirrors how you would structure your knowledge in an exam, helping you learn efficiently while developing your ability to recall and organise key legal principles under pressure. Perfect for revision, active recall and exam preparation, this resource allows you to gradually move from understanding the content to confidently recalling it independently.

Content preview

SOURCES OF LAW DISADVANTAGES
JUDICIAL PRECEDENT
Rigidity of the system of
ADVANTAGES precedent prevents the law being
The system creates certainty within the changed.
law. Illogical distinctions may be made
The judgments give detailed practical by judges in a case to avoid
rules for other judges to follow. following a previous decision.
The outcome of a new case can be It is unpredictable and dependent
predicted from earlier decision so that on chance that a case will reach a
it avoids unnecessary litigation.
Flexibility within the system allows the
ADS AND high enough court that it is able to

DISADS OF change the law.
law to develop when necessary and it
JUDICIAL The ratio decidendi of a case may
can be changed quicker than an Act of
PRECEDENT be difficult to find in the law
Parliament. report and misapplied in a future
Due to lack of parliamentary time, it case.
may be important for some laws to be It is undemocratically elected so
made by judges. it would seem that they are the
Judges are legal experts whereas best people to make laws for the
politicians are not always. country.
Judges can change the law much Judges may be biased or out-of-
quicker than Parliament and it avoids touch with modern society.
the drafting problems associated with
statutory interpretation.

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
August 9, 2026
Number of pages
1
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Summary
£7.26

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
3
Last sold
-



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions