Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages
Essay

A Level UK Politics Essay Outline (Evaluate the extent to which general elections in the UK are lost by the government rather than won by the opposition.)

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 2 pages

A Level UK Politics Essay Outline for (Evaluate the extent to which general elections in the UK are lost by the government rather than won by the opposition.)

Content preview

Serina Shrestha


Evaluate the extent to which general elections in the UK are lost by the government rather than
won by the opposition.

Introduction
Define- The general election in the UK are held every 5 years under the Fixed Term Parliament Act 2011.
Since the 1920s, the two dominant parties have been the Conservative Party and the Labour Party.
Discuss- The argument that general elections are lost by the government rather than won by the
opposition varies to different elections. In some cases, general elections are lost by governments rather
than won by the opposition due to the image of the party and its leader such as its involvement in
scandals, negative portrayal in the media and decisions that have devastating impact.
Direct- However, in other cases the general elections are rather won by the opposition due to their
attractive policies, attention of the media being widespread and captivating image of the party and its
leader, evident in the 1997 general election.

Para 1
Point- General elections are lost by the government rather than won by the opposition due to the
negative image of the party and its leader.
Evidence- This is evident in the 1997 general election where John Major’s Conservative lost to Labour,
perhaps due to results of sleaze scandal and his rejection to lower interest rates, removing the sterling
from ERM causing the catastrophic ‘Black Wednesday’.
Analysis-The image of Conservative, which had been in power for 18 years was a tired one, presided
over a deep economic recession in early 90’s, competence was an issue. Conservative PM John Major
appeared to be grey, unexciting and weak in comparison to Tony Blair who was clearly in command,
young, attractive and had a vision. The main problem for Conservatives was that the electorate
remembered the recession of the late 1980s and early 1990s and blamed it on them, resulting in the
government’s loss. There was also a general sense that the Conservatives had mismanaged the
economy. Sleaze referring to the record of sex scandals and financial corruption among Conservative
MP’s, was focused heavily on by the media.
Counter-point- However, it can be argued that the opposition party, Labour won the general election
due to their new portrayal of the party, that became attractive to the electorates as they coined it the
‘Third-way’ and ‘New Labour’.
Evaluate- But, due to the negative portrayal of the Conservative party they inevitably lost the election
rather than the opposition winning the election.

Para 2
Point- Moreover, general elections are lost by the government rather than won by the opposition as in
the 2017 general election called by the governing Conservative who were not able to gain a majority,
leading in Confidence and Supply deal with DUP.
Evidence- Despite gaining 42.2% of the vote, Theresa May lost 13 seats resulting in a hung parliament,
where May pledged to carry on with the support from DUP who had 10 seats, but her position as leader
of the Conservative party and PM had been severely weakened, including the credibility of the
Conservative party.
Analysis- The government rather lost the election due to the Conservatives continuing with policies
relating to austerity, promises to protect the NHS but making cuts to other services and major reform in
education which deterred some electorate from voting Conservative. The ‘Dementia tax’ also triggered
an embarrassing U-turn within 24 hours of the manifesto launch, while commitment to grammar schools
and the removal of triple lock on pensions alienated some of the core voters. Although with the two
terrorists attack that took place before the election, one at a concert in Manchester and other in

Document information

Study Level
Uploaded on
June 30, 2021
Number of pages
2
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A+
£5.99
Purchased by 14 students

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
SerinaS
4.6
(7)
Sold
36
Followers
32
Items
12
Last sold
1 year ago

Reviews from verified buyers




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions