Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 22 pages
Exam (elaborations)

GCSE EDEXCEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE JUNE 2026 PAPER 2 MARK SCHEME (1EN0/02)

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 22 pages

GCSE EDEXCEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE JUNE 2026 PAPER 2 MARK SCHEME (1EN0/02)

Content preview

Mark Scheme
(Results)


Summer 2026



Pearson Edexcel Level 1/Level 2 GCSE (9–1)
English Language (1EN0)
PAPER 2: Non-fiction and Transactional Writing

,Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications

Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s
largest awarding body. We provide a wide range of qualifications
including academic, vocational, occupational and specific
programmes for employers. For further information visit our
qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk.
Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our
contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus




Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help
everyone progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of
learning, for all kinds of people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve been
involved in education for over 150 years, and by working across 70 countries, in
100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to
high standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find
out more about how we can help you and your students at:
www.pearson.com/uk




Summer 2026
Question Paper Log Number P81846A
Publication Code 1EN0_02_2606_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson

, General Marking Guidance
• All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the
first candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the last.
• Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be rewarded
for what they have shown they can do rather than penalised for omissions.
• Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme not according to their
perception of where the grade boundaries may lie.
• There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark scheme should be
used appropriately.
• All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded. Examiners
should always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the
mark scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to award zero marks if the
candidate’s response is not worthy of credit according to the mark scheme.
• Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the principles
by which marks will be awarded and exemplification may be limited.
• When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark scheme
to a candidate’s response, the team leader must be consulted.
• Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate has replaced it
with an alternative response.

Specific Marking Guidance
When deciding how to reward an answer, examiners should consult both
the indicative content and the associated marking grid(s). When using a
levels-based mark scheme, the ‘best fit’ approach should be used.

• Examiners should first decide which descriptor most closely
matches the
answer and place it in that level.
• The mark awarded within the level will be decided based on the
quality of the answer and will be modified according to how
securely all bullet points are displayed at that level.
• Indicative content is exactly that – they are factual points that
candidates are likely to use to construct their answer.
• It is possible for an answer to be constructed without mentioning
some or all of these points, as long as they provide alternative
responses to the indicative content that fulfils the requirements of
the question. It is the examiner’s responsibility to apply their

Document information

Study
School year
1
Uploaded on
July 29, 2026
File latest updated on
August 21, 2026
Number of pages
22
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
£7.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
STUDYSENSEl
5.0
(79)
Sold
87
Followers
1
Items
786
Last sold
3 hours ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions