Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages
Summary

Employment Law PQ Summary Notes

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages

A comprehensive document with relevant precedents, statute and analysis tips for employment law PQs written by a first class student (73%). Covers Part 2 (Termination, Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy) and Part 3 (Direct and Indirect Discrimination) of the UCL course (the only topics examinable via PQ) and some foundational aspects from other parts (e.g. 'employee' test). Includes extra cases from the textbook, goes beyond lecture materials - essential for a first. Efficient revision tool, skip to the memorisation and application stages.

Content preview

PART 2 (TERMINATION) - Employment Rights Act 1996
WILL BE PQ
COMMON LAW - WRONGFUL DISMISSAL
1. Was employee dismissed?
On notice, summary or constructive s.95(1)(c) employee resign w/out ntoice bc employer
repudiatory breach destroy trust + confidence (Western Excavating v Sharp)
2. Summary dismissal: did employee repudiate contract? Breach reasonably destroy
trust + confidence?
 Single act if wilful show intend to abandon CoE (not follow conflicting order by
mistake Laws v London Chronicle) Misconduct (manager fail rectify colleague
misconduct Adesokan) Profanities (not if respond to persistent trivial complaints
Wilson v Racher) unauthorised access confidential info (Denco Ltd v Joinson)
serious (not discuss patient on train Chhabra) not reaching standard of cl's skills
insufficient (Dietman)
 Employer can rely on misconduct discovered after dismissal (Boston Deep Sea
Fishing v Ansell) or years before (send pornographic email Williams v Leeds United)
to defeat WD claim
3. Constructive dismissal: did employer repudiate? Destroy trust and confidence?
Western Excavating v Sharp
4. Was notice given? contract term or Minimum periods s.86
 By employer:
 Less than 2 yr work: 1 week
 More than 2 yr work: 1 week for every yr 12 weeks max
 By employee (employed 4 weeks): 1 week
 Waive right or payment in lieu s.86(3)
5. What remedy does cl want? Damages or injunction
 Injunction if: 1) srs issue to be tried 2) injunction conditions met 3) convenience
favour order
 disciplinary procedure Chhabra NOT if CoE already terminated, keep going to
work + seek injunction Geys
 Potentially available if damages aren't (Edwards)
6. If damages, what can be claimed?
 Wages lost until earliest termination date, deduction no better off than if worked,
nothing if immediately got/should've got another job (Gunton) breach trust and
confidence harmed rep/limit opps future job (Malik v BCCI) subject to JEZ
 duty to mitigate loss
 no compensation for injured feelings/rep (Addis v Gramophone) or discretionary
payment (Lavarack v Woods of Colchester) unless discretion fettered good faith
reasonable (would've got if discretion exercised honestly Horkulak v Cantor
Fitzgerald)
7. Is claim barred by JEZ? Can only claim for contractual breach before/unconnected to
dismissal itself Johnson v Unisys manner of dismissal barred acts independent from
dismissal outside JEZ can claim Eastwood (eg abuse disciplinary procedure w/ suspension +
false charges) cant get damages for breach of contractual disciplinary procedure even if
before dismissal injunction possible (Edwards )
 no DOC for psych vulnerable in dismissal but may for suspension (McCabe v
Cornwall)

Connected book
 image
Hugh Collins, Keith Ewing, Aileen McColgan Labour Law
Publisher: 2019 ISBN: 9781316515747 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Study
Unknown
Summarized whole book?
Yes
Uploaded on
July 10, 2026
Number of pages
3
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Summary
£37.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
tassneemjmahdi
4.0
(2)
Sold
16
Followers
10
Items
12
Last sold
5 months ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions