Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 26 pages
Exam (elaborations)

HRPYC81 Project 5 Assignment 4 (RESEARCH REPORT) 2026 - DUE 13 October 2026 - The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 3 out of 26 pages

HRPYC81 Project 5 Assignment 4 (RESEARCH REPORT) 2026 - DUE 13 October 2026 - The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs ; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2... Ensure your success with us... Research Project The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs Research Area General Psychology Number of Students Limited to 400 students Project Description Imagine the following situation. After waiting several hours at a local clinic, Zanele noticed that some patients had been called in before her. When others in the queue suggested that clinic staff were secretly prioritising certain people for hidden reasons, she began to believe the system was deliberately unfair. Feeling anxious and lacking control, Zanele stopped trusting official explanations about delays and interpreted routine inefficiency as evidence of a hidden plan. Zanele assumes a conspiracy. Some conspiracy theories can be benign and thus, rather entertaining than harmful. However, other conspiracy theories have the potential to be harmful to individuals and/or societies, such as the claim that HIV does not cause AIDS, and that antiretroviral treatments are harmful, promoted by the former president Thabo Mbeki from 1999 to 2008. It is essential to note that conspiracy theories are not only omnipresent among members of both modern and traditional societies, but also that the term conspiracy has been used to invalidate legitimate accusations (e.g., corruption). It is also important to note that conspiracies actually exist, as the State Capture Conspiracy that “A small group of business elites secretly controls government decisions” was eventually confirmed by the Zondo Commission. Conspiracy theory beliefs, which emerge from interactions of cognitive, motivational, personality, and socio-cultural processes, refer to “theories” about how people, objects or events are causally interconnected (pattern), stipulate that the plans of alleged conspirators are deliberate (agency), involve a coalition, or group, of actors working in conjunction, contain an element of threat such that the alleged goals of the conspirators are harmful or deceptive, and carry an element of secrecy and is therefore often difficult to invalidate (van Prooijen & van Vugt, 2018). Grounded in various psychological theoretical foundations (e.g., motivational, cognitive and reasoning styles) and related to concepts such as conspiracy mentality and cognitive biases, they are often described as comprising different interrelated components and psychological functions. Recent research suggests that conspiracy theory beliefs are related to various factors, including personality (dark triad) traits such as Narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and conspiracy mentality, emotional factors such as anxiety, cognitive factors such as (illusory) 2 pattern perceptions, Bullshit receptivity, supernatural beliefs, trust, mattering, mental well-being, life satisfaction, prosocial behaviour, prejudice and corruption, among. In addition, sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, relationship status, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status will be included as potential control variables.

Content preview

HRPYC81
PROJECT 5: The Psychology of Conspiracy Beliefs
Assignment 4 RESEARCH REPORT 2026
Due Date: 2026
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANXIETY, TRUST AND CONSPIRACY THEORY
BELIEFS AMONG ADULTS IN SOUTH AFRICA

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the relationship between anxiety, trust, and conspiracy theory
beliefs among adults in South Africa. Conspiracy theory beliefs have been associated with
uncertainty, institutional distrust, and psychological distress, making them particularly
relevant in socio-political contexts characterised by inequality and governance challenges
(Douglas et al., 2019). The study aimed to test whether higher levels of anxiety and lower
levels of trust are associated with stronger endorsement of conspiracy theory beliefs. A
quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, using data collected through an
online questionnaire administered via Qualtrics. The sample consisted of adult participants
aged 18 years and older, with data pooled across multiple student researchers to increase
sample size and variability. Conspiracy theory beliefs were measured using the Composite
Conspiracy Belief Scale (Talò, 2025), anxiety was assessed using the Depression Anxiety
Stress Scales (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995), and trust was measured using the General
Trust Scale (Yamagishi & Yamagishi, 1994). Terms of use
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document as a guide for learning, comparison and reference purpose,
Terms of use
 Not to duplicate, reproduce and/or misrepresent the contents of this document as your own work,
By making use of this document you agree to:
 Use this document
Fully accept the consequences
solely as a guide forshould you plagiarise
learning, reference,or and
misuse this document.
comparison purposes,
 Ensure originality of your own work, and fully accept the consequences should you plagiarise or misuse this document.
 Comply with all relevant standards, guidelines, regulations, and legislation governing academic and written work.

Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is" without any express or
implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for any actions taken based on the
information contained within this document. This document is intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes.
Reproduction, resale, or transmission of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 81 278 3372



THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANXIETY, TRUST AND CONSPIRACY THEORY
BELIEFS AMONG ADULTS IN SOUTH AFRICA

ABSTRACT

The present study examined the relationship between anxiety, trust, and conspiracy
theory beliefs among adults in South Africa. Conspiracy theory beliefs have been
associated with uncertainty, institutional distrust, and psychological distress, making
them particularly relevant in socio-political contexts characterised by inequality and
governance challenges (Douglas et al., 2019). The study aimed to test whether
higher levels of anxiety and lower levels of trust are associated with stronger
endorsement of conspiracy theory beliefs. A quantitative cross-sectional survey
design was employed, using data collected through an online questionnaire
administered via Qualtrics. The sample consisted of adult participants aged 18 years
and older, with data pooled across multiple student researchers to increase sample
size and variability. Conspiracy theory beliefs were measured using the Composite
Conspiracy Belief Scale (Talò, 2025), anxiety was assessed using the Depression
Anxiety Stress Scales (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995), and trust was measured using
the General Trust Scale (Yamagishi & Yamagishi, 1994).

The results indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between anxiety
and conspiracy theory beliefs, suggesting that individuals with higher anxiety levels
were more likely to endorse conspiratorial explanations. In addition, a statistically
significant negative relationship was found between trust and conspiracy theory
beliefs, indicating that lower levels of trust were associated with stronger conspiracy
belief endorsement. These findings support the proposed hypotheses and highlight
the role of emotional and social factors in shaping conspiracy thinking. The study
contributes to the understanding of conspiracy theory beliefs within the South African
context by demonstrating how anxiety and trust interact to influence belief formation.
The findings have implications for interventions aimed at improving public trust and
addressing psychological vulnerability to misinformation.

.



Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

, +27 81 278 3372



1. INTRODUCTION

Conspiracy theory beliefs have become increasingly prominent in contemporary
societies, particularly in contexts marked by uncertainty, inequality, and declining
institutional trust. These beliefs refer to explanations of events that attribute causality
to secret, coordinated actions by powerful groups acting with harmful intent (van
Prooijen & Douglas, 2018). In South Africa, persistent socio-economic inequality,
corruption, and service delivery challenges have created conditions in which
individuals may question official explanations and become more susceptible to
conspiratorial thinking (Cordonier & Cafiero, 2024). Understanding the psychological
factors associated with conspiracy beliefs is therefore critical, as such beliefs can
undermine public health initiatives, reduce institutional trust, and contribute to social
division (Douglas et al., 2019).

Emotional and social factors play a central role in the development of conspiracy
theory beliefs. Anxiety has been identified as a key emotional driver, as individuals
experiencing uncertainty and distress are more likely to seek explanations that
provide structure and predictability (Krüppel et al., 2023). Conspiracy beliefs offer
simplified causal narratives that can temporarily reduce psychological discomfort. At
the same time, trust represents an important social factor that shapes how
individuals evaluate information. Low levels of trust in institutions and authorities
increase the likelihood of rejecting official accounts and endorsing alternative
explanations (Jennings et al., 2021).

The present study examines the relationship between anxiety, trust, and conspiracy
theory beliefs within the South African context. Specifically, the study investigates
whether higher levels of anxiety and lower levels of trust are associated with stronger
endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. These constructs were examined using a
quantitative cross-sectional survey design, allowing for the statistical analysis of
relationships between variables. By focusing on these factors, the study aims to
contribute to a deeper understanding of the psychological processes underlying
conspiracy theory beliefs and to inform strategies aimed at addressing their negative
societal consequences.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken in the preparation of this document; however, the contents are provided "as is"
without any express or implied representations or warranties. The author accepts no responsibility or
liability for any actions taken based on the information contained within this document. This document is
intended solely for comparison, research, and reference purposes. Reproduction, resale, or transmission
of any part of this document, in any form or by any means, is strictly prohibited.

Connected book
 image
Peter A. Starreveld, Peter A. Starreveld Writing Psychology Research Reports
Publisher: Unknown ISBN: 9789024425402 Edition: 1

Document information

Uploaded on
April 27, 2026
Number of pages
26
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
£3.55

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal
4.2
(14361)
Sold
153976
Followers
36024
Items
5135
Last sold
1 hour ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions