Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 32 pages
Exam (elaborations)

Edexcel chemistry ( A level ) MS 3 SUMMER JUNE 2026 PREDICTED PAPER

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 32 pages

Edexcel chemistry ( A level ) MS 3 SUMMER JUNE 2026 PREDICTED PAPER

Content preview

Summer 2026 Predicted




Mark Scheme (Results)
Summer 2026
Predicted
Pearson Edexcel GCE

Chemistry (9CH0) Paper 03

General and Practical Principles in
Chemistry




for more papers: tyrionpapers.com

,for more papers: tyrionpapers.com

,General Marking Guidance


• All candidates must receive the same treatment.
Examiners must mark the first candidate in exactly
the same way as they mark the last.
• Mark schemes should be applied positively.
Candidates must be rewarded for what they have
shown they can do rather than penalised for
omissions.
• Examiners should mark according to the mark
scheme not according to their perception of
where the grade boundaries may lie.
• There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark
scheme should be used appropriately.
• All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be
awarded. Examiners should always award full
marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the
mark scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to
award zero marks if the candidate’s response is
not worthy of credit according to the mark
scheme.
• Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will
provide the principles by which marks will be
awarded and exemplification may be limited.
• When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the
mark scheme to a candidate’s response, the team
leader must be consulted.
• Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate has
replaced it with an alternative response.




for more papers: tyrionpapers.com

, Using the Mark Scheme

Examiners should look for qualities to reward rather than faults to penalise.
This does NOT mean giving credit for incorrect or inadequate answers, but it
does mean allowing candidates to be rewarded for answers showing correct
application of principles and knowledge. Examiners should therefore read
carefully and consider every response: even if it is not what is expected it may
be worthy of credit.

The mark scheme gives examiners:
• an idea of the types of response expected
• how individual marks are to be awarded
• the total mark for each question
• examples of responses that should NOT receive credit.

/ means that the responses are alternatives and either answer should receive full credit.
( ) means that a phrase/word is not essential for the award of the mark, but helps
the examiner to get the sense of the expected answer.
Phrases/words in bold indicate that the meaning of the phrase or the actual word is
essential to the answer.
ecf/TE/cq (error carried forward) means that a wrong answer given in an earlier part
of a question is used correctly in answer to a later part of the same question.

Candidates must make their meaning clear to the examiner to gain the mark.
Make sure that the answer makes sense. Do not give credit for correct
words/phrases which are put together in a meaningless manner. Answers must
be in the correct context.

Quality of Written Communication

Questions which involve the writing of continuous prose will expect candidates to:
• write legibly, with accurate use of spelling, grammar and
punctuation in order to make the meaning clear
• select and use a form and style of writing appropriate to purpose and
to complex subject matter
• organise information clearly and coherently, using specialist
vocabulary when appropriate.
Full marks will be awarded if the candidate has demonstrated the above
abilities. Questions where QWC is likely to be particularly important are
indicated (QWC) in the mark scheme, but this does not preclude others.




for more papers: tyrionpapers.com

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
April 4, 2026
Number of pages
32
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Only questions
£4.19

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Sold
154
Followers
0
Items
819
Last sold
1 month ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions