Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages
Exam (elaborations)

JOMC 486 Midterm UNLEXAM QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 6 pages

JOMC 486 Midterm UNLEXAM QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERSActual Malice - CORRECT ANSWERproof of knowledge of falsity or proof of reckless disregard. Actual malice must be shown when - CORRECT ANSWER-a public official is the plaintiff -a public figure is the plaintiff -a private plaintiff wants punitive damages Actual Malice Type A - CORRECT ANSWERKnowledge of falsity; intentional lying Actual Malice Type B - CORRECT ANSWERReckless disregard requires showing that the defendant in fact entertained serious doubt as to the truth of a statement or possessed a high degree of awareness of the probable falsity of the statement Anti-SLAPP laws - CORRECT ANSWERLaws designed to reduce frivolous lawsuits filed against citizens and community groups who oppose corporations, government officials, and others.

Content preview

JOMC 486 Midterm UNLEXAM
QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS.

absolute privilege - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅a witness testifying in a court or
legislature may never be sued for defamation

Actual Malice - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅proof of knowledge of falsity or proof of
reckless disregard.

Actual malice must be shown when - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅-a public official is the
plaintiff
-a public figure is the plaintiff
-a private plaintiff wants punitive damages

Actual Malice Type A - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅Knowledge of falsity; intentional lying

Actual Malice Type B - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅Reckless disregard requires showing
that the defendant
in fact entertained serious doubt as to the truth of a statement or
possessed a high degree of awareness of the probable falsity of the statement

Anti-SLAPP laws - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅Laws designed to reduce frivolous
lawsuits filed against citizens and community groups who oppose corporations,
government officials, and others.

Appellate Review - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅after a trial/hearing, the appeal to the next
level of court where the court will review the record of what happened at the lower level.
The court will not conduct a trial nor receive new evidence or testimony

Appropriation - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅-using for one's own benefit
-the name or likeness of another person without permission

beyond a reasonable doubt - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅The level of proof required to
convict a person of a crime (95%)

Brandenburg Test - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅1. Intent to incite violence or unlawful
activity
2. Imminence of violence or unlawful activity
3. Likelihood of violence or unlawful activity

, Clear and convincing - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅The standard of proof used in some
civil trials. The evidence presented must be greater than a preponderance of the
evidence but less than beyond a reasonable doubt (75-85%)

Common Law Defenses - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅-Truth
-Absolute privilege
-Fair-report privilege (qualified privilege)
-Fair-comment privilege

Content Neutrality - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅a court-imposed requirement that
government regulations of free expression not be based on the viewpoint being
expressed or the identity of the speaker

content-based regulations - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅subject to strict scrutiny

content-neutral regulations - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅judged by a less demanding
standard

content-neutral, content-based dichotomy - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅examines the
regulation, not the expression

Defamation - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅Act of harming or ruining another's reputation

defamation by implication - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅Person knowingly publishes a lie
or offending statement with reckless disregard for the truth.

Plaintiff must be a public figure.

Defamation per quod - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅a facially innocent statement becomes
defamatory when it is combined with unstated facts known to the audience

the plaintiff must prove special damages

Defamation per se - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅words are defamatory on their face

Determining truth - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅1. the jury must determine what the gist of
the publication was and whether the gist is defamatory
2. the jury must decide whether the preponderance of the evidence proves the
defamatory statements true

disparagement - CORRECT ANSWER✅✅cast doubt upon the quality of another's land,
products or services and the publisher intends the statement to cast the doubt or the
recipient's understanding of its as casting the doubt was reasonable

Document information

Study
Uploaded on
March 24, 2026
Number of pages
6
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
£9.12

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
1
Followers
0
Items
934
Last sold
9 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions